Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.

Allen I. Huffcutt, James M. Conway, Philip L. Roth, Nancy J. Stone·2001·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in understanding what constructs are assessed in the employment interview and the properties of those assessments. To address these issues, the authors developed a comprehensive taxonomy of 7 types of constructs that the interview could assess. Analysis of 338 ratings from 47 actual interview studies indicated that basic personality and applied social skills were the most frequently rated constructs in this taxonomy, followed by mental capability and job knowledge and skills. Further analysis suggested that high- and low-structure interviews tend to focus on different constructs. Taking both frequency and validity results into consideration, the findings suggest that at least part of the reason why structured interviews tend to have higher validity is because they focus more on constructs that have a stronger relationship with job performance. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Cites (8)

  1. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
    Festinger, Leon · 1957
  2. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
    Rotter, Julian B. · 1966 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  3. THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
    BARRICK, MURRAY R., MOUNT, MICHAEL K. · 1991 · Personnel Psychology
  4. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 2015
  5. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 1998 · Psychological Bulletin
  6. Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
    Hedges, Larry V., Vevea, Jack L. · 1998 · Psychological Methods
  7. HUMAN ABILITIES
    Sternberg, Robert J., Kaufman, James C. · 1998 · Annual Review of Psychology
  8. USING RANDOM RATHER THAN FIXED EFFECTS MODELS IN META‐ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SITUATIONAL SPECIFICITY AND VALIDITY GENERALIZATION
    EREZ, AMIR, BLOOM, MATTHEW C., WELLS, MARTIN T · 1996 · Personnel Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (17)

  1. Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study
    McKee-Ryan, Frances, Song, Zhaoli, Wanberg, Connie R., Kinicki, Angelo J. · 2005 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes
    Ilies, Remus, Morgeson, Frederick P., Nahrgang, Jennifer D. · 2005 · The Leadership Quarterly
  3. SELECTING INDIVIDUALS IN TEAM SETTINGS: THE IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL SKILLS, PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS, AND TEAMWORK KNOWLEDGE
    MORGESON, FREDERICK P., REIDER, MATTHEW H., CAMPION, MICHAEL A. · 2005 · Personnel Psychology
  4. A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS
    ARTHUR, WINFRED, DAY, ERIC ANTHONY, MCNELLY, THERESA L., EDENS, PAMELA S. · 2003 · Personnel Psychology
  5. BEYOND EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW VALIDITY: A COMPREHENSIVE NARRATIVE REVIEW OF RECENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS OVER TIME
    Posthuma, Richard A., Morgeson, Frederick P., Campion, Michael A. · 2002 · Personnel Psychology

See all 407

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.897
The paper
Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.897

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.