The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance.
Abstract
Previous research on transactive memory has found a positive relationship between transactive memory system development and group performance in single project laboratory and ad hoc groups. Closely related research on shared mental models and expertise recognition supports these findings. In this study, the author examined the relationship between transactive memory systems and performance in mature, continuing groups. A group's transactive memory system, measured as a combination of knowledge stock, knowledge specialization, transactive memory consensus, and transactive memory accuracy, is positively related to group goal performance, external group evaluations, and internal group evaluations. The positive relationship with group performance was found to hold for both task and external relationship transactive memory systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind
Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Theories of Group Behavior · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9 · Cited by 2,700
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
Socially Shared Cognition at Work: Transactive Memory and Group Performance
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996) · What's Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups · doi:10.4135/9781483327648.n3 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes
Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309347376 · Cited by 1,141
10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective
Okhuysen, G. A., & Bechky, B. A. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047533 · Cited by 998
A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective
Bunderson, J. S. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556637 · Cited by 527
Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
Ehsan, U., Liao, Q. V., Muller, M., Riedl, M. O., & Weisz, J. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445188 · Cited by 538
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225
How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Study
Piorkowski, D., Park, S., Wang, A. Y., Wang, D., Muller, M., & Portnoy, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449205 · Cited by 151
Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance
Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1078 · Cited by 119
People mistake the internet’s knowledge for their own
Ward, A. F. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105061118 · Cited by 82
Collective choice, collaboration, and communication
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211 · Cited by 60
Guillén, L., & Kunze, F. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21953 · Cited by 44
Criteria Issues and Team Effectiveness
Mathieu, J. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 2 · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0027 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Austin, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 866-878
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1991095634
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
