Cited by 611Cognitive Abilities and TestingLeadership and Management in OrganizationsEmotional Intelligence and Performance

Intelligence and leadership: A quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions

Judge, Timothy A., Colbert, Amy E., Ilies, Remus·2004·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Meta-analysis was used to aggregate results from studies examining the relationship between intelligence and leadership. One hundred fifty-one independent samples in 96 sources met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Results indicated that the corrected correlation between intelligence and leadership is.21 (uncorrected for range restriction) and.27 (corrected for range restriction). Perceptual measures of intelligence showed stronger correlations with leadership than did paper-and-pencil measures of intelligence. Intelligence correlated equally well with objective and perceptual measures of leadership. Additionally, the leader's stress level and the leader's directiveness moderated the intelligence-leadership relationship. Overall, results suggest that the relationship between intelligence and leadership is considerably lower than previously thought. The results also provide meta-analytic support for both implicit leadership theory and cognitive resource theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.542

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General intelligence can become less important for the leader in certain situational contexts.

    “Our point is that there is also evidence to suggest that, just as emotional intelligence effects can be contextdetermined, general intelligence can become less important for the leader in certain situational contexts.”

    From Does leadership need emotional intelligence? (2009) · cites this paper as Judge, Colbert, and Ilies (2004)

  • General intelligence is a predictor of leadership effectiveness only when leaders are in low stress situations.

    “Judge, Colbert, and Ilies (2004) enlisted principles of cognitive resource theory to make the case that general intelligence is a predictor of leadership effectiveness only when leaders are in low stress situations.”

    From Does leadership need emotional intelligence? (2009) · cites this paper as Judge, Colbert, and Ilies (2004)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., & Ilies, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
542-552
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2066644569
Cited by
611
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 38
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Keywords
intelligence, leadership, range restriction, perceptual intelligence, leader stress, implicit leadership theory
MeSH terms
Humans, Intelligence, Leadership, Models, Theoretical, Professional Competence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review