The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes.
Open accessAbstract
This study was based on a sample of 139 employees. The results support the hypothesis that proactive personality (PAP) predicts work perceptions (procedural justice perception, perceived supervisor support, and social integration) and work outcomes (job satisfaction, affective organizational commitment, and job performance) positively among individuals with high situational judgment effectiveness (SJE) but negatively among those with low SJE. The findings on the disordinal SJE = PAP interaction effects show that high levels of PAP may be either adaptive or maladaptive, depending on the individual's level of SJE, and these findings caution against direct interpretations of bivariate associations between PAP and work-relevant criteria. Limitations and implications of the study as well as future research directions on the study of PAP and situational judgment are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
Proactive Behavior in Organizations
Crant, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600304 · Cited by 2,701
Cited by
Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310363732 · Cited by 2,096
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
Psychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12183 · Cited by 1,231
Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature
Fuller, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 · Cited by 688
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260 · Cited by 682
Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research
Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.007 · Cited by 207
Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams
Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12108 · Cited by 170
Does the Job Satisfaction—Job Performance Relationship Vary Across Cultures?
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Yim, F. H. K. (2009) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109339208 · Cited by 123
Artinger, F. M., Marx-Fleck, S., Junker, N. M., Gigerenzer, G., Artinger, S., & van Dick, R. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115240 · Cited by 29
Srivastava, S., & Bajpai, L. (2021) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-10-2019-0548 · Cited by 24
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 475-481
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W1996793422
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
