Cited by 120Social and Intergroup PsychologyCognitive Abilities and TestingEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The difference isn't black and white: Stereotype threat and the race gap on raven's advanced progressive matrices.

Brown, Ryan P., Day, Eric Anthony·2006·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This study addresses recent criticisms aimed at the interpretation of stereotype threat research and methodological weaknesses of previous studies that have examined race differences on Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM). African American and White undergraduates completed the APM under three conditions. In two threat conditions, participants received either standard APM instructions (standard threat) or were told that the APM was an IQ test (high threat). In a low threat condition, participants were told that the APM was a set of puzzles and that the researchers wanted their opinions of them. Results supported the stereotype threat interpretation of race differences in cognitive ability test scores. Although African American participants underperformed Whites under both standard and high threat instructions, they performed just as well as Whites did under low threat instructions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.979

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, R. P., & Day, E. A.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
979-985
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2054322260
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
16.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
stereotype threat, Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, racial differences, cognitive ability tests
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Black or African American, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Social Behavior, Stereotyping, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review