Cited by 98Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingWork-Family Balance ChallengesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Successfully leaving work at work: The self-regulatory underpinnings of psychological detachment

Smit, Brandon W.·2016·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Detaching from work – defined as mentally and physically disengaging from work during off‐hours – is an important prerequisite to effective daily recovery and psychological well‐being. However, the extant literature has yet to articulate exactly why some employees fail to detach from work and, furthermore, offers few concrete recommendations on how to increase detachment on a daily basis. I illustrate how both of these limitations may be resolved by extending the definition of psychological detachment to more clearly specify from what employees are failing to detach. Drawing from self‐regulation research, the theoretical framework developed in this study proposes that employees' minds continue to linger over goal‐related content after the workday is finished. This proposition was supported in a longitudinal sample of 103 employees pursuing 1,127 goals. Consistent with a self‐regulatory perspective, employees had more difficulty detaching from incomplete (vs. completed) work goals later in the day, especially when these goals possessed high valence. Furthermore, an experimental manipulation demonstrated that creating plans to resolve incomplete goals increased psychological detachment among employees with traits that chronically inhibit detachment. I discuss how this refined conceptualization of psychological detachment catalyses future theoretical development and provides groundwork for evidence‐based interventions. Practitioner points: Creating plans at the end of the day that describe where, when, and how unfulfilled work goals will be completed is an effective, low‐cost intervention that enhances psychological detachment among employees, which will ultimately improve occupational health and performance. The planning intervention was primarily effective among employees who typically have difficulty detaching from work during leisure time, indicating that intervention efforts should be targeted at specific types of employees. When setting daily work goals, employees should be encouraged to focus on smaller, concrete goals at the end of the day in order to reduce unfulfilled work goals and facilitate psychological detachment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joop.12137

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smit, B. W.
Affiliations
Ball State University (US)
Corresponding author
Smit, Brandon W.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-12
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
493-514
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2135755482
Cited by
98
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
psychological detachment, work-life boundaries, self-regulation, employee well-being, work recovery, goal setting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review