The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions.
Abstract
Results of 2 experimental studies in which job incumbents were said to be applying for promotions to traditionally male positions demonstrated bias against mothers in competence expectations and in screening recommendations. This bias occurred regardless of whether the research participants were students (Study 1) or working people (Study 2). Although anticipated job commitment, achievement striving, and dependability were rated as generally lower for parents than for nonparents, anticipated competence was uniquely low for mothers. Mediational analyses indicated that, as predicted, negativity in competence expectations, not anticipated job commitment or achievement striving, promoted the motherhood bias in screening recommendations; expected deficits in agentic behaviors, not in dependability, were found to fuel these competence expectations. These findings suggest that motherhood can indeed hinder the career advancement of women and that it is the heightened association with gender stereotypes that occurs when women are mothers that is the source of motherhood's potentially adverse consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Heilman, M. E. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234 · Cited by 2,482
Self-citationWhy are women penalized for success at male tasks?: the implied communality deficit
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81 · Cited by 999
Self-citation
Cited by
Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations
Kay, M., Matuszek, C., & Munson, S. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702520 · Cited by 509
Diversity and leadership in a changing world.
Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0018957 · Cited by 395
Wang, M., & Wanberg, C. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000143 · Cited by 205
Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements
Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2016) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1067611 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 189-198
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2008060831
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
- The paper
- Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.