CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Attachment and Relationship DynamicsEmotion and Mood RecognitionPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction.

Gottman, John M., Levenson, Robert W.·1985·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-006x.53.2.151
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Thirty married couples interacted in a low-conflict situation and a high-conflict situation during which continuous physiological measures were obtained. Each spouse returned separately for a second session in which they watched the videotape of the interaction and provided a continuous self-report rating of their own affect while the same physiological measures were again obtained. Observers coded the spouses' affect during each speech unit. The self-reports of affect (a) discriminated the high-conflict interaction from the low-conflict interaction, (b) correlated significantly with marital satisfaction, (c) were coherent between husband and wife, and (d) were significantly related to the observers' coding of the couples' affect. Physiological data obtained during the interaction session were significantly related (using time-series analyses) to physiological data obtained during the recall session. In all comprehensive discussions of emotion the subject's own experience of affect has been considered an important channel of information (see Strongman, 1978). This channel has always been troublesome from an empirical standpoint in terms of meeting psychometric criteria of reliability and validity. One important application of a valid selfreport procedure would be in the study of emotion during social interaction. Ekman, Friesen, and Ellsworth (1972) noted that the study of emotion in the context of social interaction can make a number of unique contributions. One of these contributions is the study of interaction as it unfolds in time, which permits the analysis of the sequential nature of the interaction using time-series analysis. Thus, a method for procuring the self-report of affect that could provide a continuous record over an interaction session would be extremely useful in the study of emotion in social interaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.53.2.151

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
ORCID
Levenson, Robert W.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1985
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
151-160
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
DOI
10.1037/0022-006x.53.2.151
OpenAlex
W2137163739
Cited by
281
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (K200257)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH29910, MH 39895)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
marital interaction, marital conflict, marital satisfaction, physiological measures, self-report validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Mental Recall, Self Disclosure, Sympathetic Nervous System, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review