Cited by 278Cultural Differences and ValuesEmotions and Moral BehaviorAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Cultural Influences on Emotional Responding: Chinese American and European American Dating Couples During Interpersonal Conflict

Tsai, Jeanne L., Levenson, Robert W.·1997·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

Ethnographic descriptions suggest that compared to European Americans, Chinese Americans place a greater emphasis on emotional moderation. To assess whether such cultural differences influence actual emotional responding, we compared the physiological responses and reported affect of 22 Chinese American and 20 European American college-age dating couples in an interpersonal context, that is, during conversations about areas of conflict in their relationship. Although some of our findings were consistent with ethnographic notions of greater emotional moderation in Chinese culture (Chinese Americans demonstrated less variable and less positive reported affect and less variable cardiac interbeat intervals than European Americans), other findings were not (Chinese Americans and European Americans did not differ in most measures of physiological responding and in reported negative affect).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022197285006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive emotional contexts may be more likely to reveal ethnic differences in suppression.

    “Positive emotional contexts also may be more likely to reveal ethnic differences in suppression.”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Tsai & Levenson, 1997

  • Suppressing and exaggerating one's facial response to positive (but not negative) stimuli has been found to decrease and increase self-reported positive emotion, respectively.

    “For example, suppressing and exaggerating one's facial response to positive (but not negative) stimuli has been found to decrease and increase self-reported positive emotion, respectively”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Tsai & Levenson, 1997

  • Ethnic and cultural differences often have emerged in positive but not negative emotional contexts.

    “and ethnic and cultural differences often have emerged in positive but not negative emotional contexts (Gross et al., 2006; Roberts & Levenson, 2006; Tsai & Levenson, 1997).”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Tsai & Levenson, 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, J. L., & Levenson, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
1997-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
600-625
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2161188078
Cited by
278
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
cultural differences in emotion, Chinese Americans, European Americans, interpersonal conflict, dating couples, physiological responses, cardiac interbeat intervals, negative affect, cross-cultural comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review