Cited by 134Action Observation and SynchronizationEmotions and Moral BehaviorEmpathy and Medical Education

The multiple facets of empathy: a survey of theory and evidence

Leiberg, Susanne, Anders, Silke·2006·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Empathy is the ability to perceive and understand other people's emotions and to react appropriately. This ability is a necessary prerequisite for successful interpersonal interaction. Empathy is a multifaceted construct including low-level mechanisms like emotional contagion as well as high-level processes like perspective-taking. The ability to empathize varies between individuals and is considered a stable personality trait: some people are generally more successful in empathizing than others. In this chapter we will first present different conceptualizations of the construct of empathy, and refer to empathy-regulating processes as well as to the relationship between empathy and social behavior. Then, we will review peripheral physiological and brain imaging studies pertaining to low- and high-level empathic processes, empathy-modulating processes, and the link between empathy and social behavior. Further, we will present evidence regarding interindividual differences in these processes as an important source of information for solving the conundrum of how the comprehension of others' emotions is achieved by our brains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56023-6

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More automatic, bottom-up driven mapping and awareness of others' emotional states in empathy might be modulated by more controlled, top-down processes involved in attributing mind states (ToM).

    “more automatic, bottom-up driven mapping and awareness of others emotional states in the context of self–other distinction (i.e., empathy) might be modulated by more controlled, top-down processes involved in attributing mind states (i.e., ToM)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leiberg, S., & Anders, S.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2006
Volume
156
Pages
419-440
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1529908276
Cited by
134
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.21
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
empathy, emotional contagion, perspective taking, social behavior, individual differences, emotional understanding, personality traits
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Empathy, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychophysics, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review