Cited by 316Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsChild Therapy and Development

The efficacy of problem-solving communication training alone, behavior management training alone, and their combination for parent–adolescent conflict in teenagers with ADHD and ODD.

Barkley, Russell A., Edwards, Gwenyth, Laneri, Margaret, Fletcher, Kenneth, Metevia, Lori·2001·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Two family therapies were compared using teens with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Ninety-seven families were assigned to either 18 sessions of problem-solving communication training (PSCT) alone or behavior management training (BMT) for 9 sessions followed by PSCT for 9 sessions (BMT/PSCT). Both treatments demonstrated significant improvement in ratings of parent-teen conflicts at the midpoint but did not differ. By posttreatment, both produced improvement on ratings and observations but did not differ. Significantly more families dropped out of PSCT alone than out of BMT/PSCT. At most, 23% of families showed reliable change either by midpoint or by posttreatment, with no differences between therapies. Yet 31%-70% of families were normalized. Group-level change and normalization rates support treatment efficacy, whereas indices of reliable change are less impressive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.926

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
926-941
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2016533734
Cited by
316
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041583-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH41583)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
behavior management training, parent-adolescent conflict, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, family therapy, treatment efficacy, treatment discontinuation, reliable change
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Child, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Teaching, Treatment Outcome, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review