Cited by 324Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Brief cognitive therapy for panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

Clark, David M., Salkovskis, Paul M., Hackmann, Ann, Wells, Adrian, Ludgate, John, Gelder, Michael·1999·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Cognitive therapy (CT) is a specific and highly effective treatment for panic disorder (PD). Treatment normally involves 12-15 1-hr sessions. In an attempt to produce a more cost-effective version, a briefer treatment that made extensive use of between-sessions patient self-study modules was created. Forty-three PD patients were randomly allocated to full CT (FCT), brief CT (BCT), or a 3-month wait list. FCT and BCT were superior to wait list on all measures, and the gains obtained in treatment were maintained at 12-month follow-up. There were no significant differences between FCT and BCT. Both treatments had large (approximately 3.0) and essentially identical effect sizes. BCT required 6.5 hr of therapist time, including booster sessions. Patients' initial expectation of therapy success was negatively correlated with posttreatment panic-anxiety. Cognitive measures at the end of treatment predicted panic-anxiety at 12-month follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.67.4.583

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has demonstrated that brief treatments of three to five sessions can lead to drastic improvements in panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and GAD.

    “Previous research has demonstrated that brief treatments consisting of as little as three to five sessions can lead to drastic improvements in several anxiety disorders including panic disorder (Clark et al., 1999;Otto et al., 2012), social anxiety disorder (Gallagher et al., 2004), and GAD (Hunot et al., 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Hackmann, A., Wells, A., Ludgate, J., & Gelder, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
583-589
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W4234796490
Cited by
324
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
18.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
panic disorder, cognitive therapy, self-instructional module, treatment duration, cost-effectiveness, booster sessions, maintenance of treatment effects, treatment expectations
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Agoraphobia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Brief, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review