Cited by 104Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The concept and definition of low intensity cognitive behaviour therapy

Open access
Shafran, Roz, Myles-Hooton, Pamela, Bennett, Sophie, Öst, Lars-Göran·2021·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

There is confusion in the terminology used to describe different forms of cognitive behaviour therapy, in particular low intensity CBT. Such confusion has implications for research, clinical practice and service organisation. This thought-piece aims to describe the key components of low intensity CBT in comparison to brief high intensity standard CBT. It is proposed that low intensity CBT (i) utilises self-help materials, (ii) is six hours or less of contact time with each contact being typically 30 minutes or less, and (iii) any input can be provided by trained practitioners or supporters. These components distinguish the intervention from brief high intensity intensity CBT which (i) is based on the standard evidence-based CBT treatment, with therapy contact time 50% or less than the full CBT intervention, and (ii) is usually delivered by someone with a core mental health professional qualification or equivalent. Brief CBT can refer to either low intensity CBT and/or brief high intensity CBT. We hope that making the distinction between these different forms of intervention stimulates debate and helps consistent and appropriate categorisation for future research and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103803

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bennett-Levy, J., Richards, D., Farrand, P., Christensen, H., & Griffiths, K. (Eds.). (2010). Oxford guide to low intensity CBT interventions. New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Papworth, M., & Marrinan, T. (Eds.). (2018). Low intensity cognitive behaviour therapy: A practitioner s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shafran, R., Myles-Hooton, P., Bennett, S., & Öst, L.-G.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Shafran, Roz
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
138
Pages
103803
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118925636
Cited by
104
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
self-help materials, practitioner qualifications, terminology, evidence-based treatment
MeSH terms
Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review