Cited by 112Child Development and Digital TechnologyMedia Influence and HealthParental Involvement in Education

Exploring Pathways From Television Viewing to Academic Achievement in School Age Children

Shin, Nary·2004·The Journal of Genetic Psychology

Abstract

The author's purpose in this study was to test 4 hypotheses that proposed different paths for the influences of children's television viewing on their academic achievement. Data were drawn from the 1997 Child Development Supplement (CDS) to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The population for this study included 1,203 children between the ages of 6 and 13 years from the CDS-PSID data set. The author used structural equation modeling to test pathways from children's television viewing to their academic achievement. The author assumed that children's television viewing hindered their academic achievement by reducing certain traits that related to academic achievement. Results showed that 3 hypothetical models fit the data--the time-displacement hypothesis, the mental effort-passivity hypothesis, and the attention-arousal hypothesis. A 4th hypothetical model, the learning-information hypothesis, which proposed that children's television viewing practices stimulate their academic achievement, was not supported. In sum, children who watched more television tended to spend less time doing homework, studying, and reading for leisure. In addition, their behaviors became more impulsive, which resulted in an eventual decrease in their academic achievement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/gntp.165.4.367-382

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitivity analyses suggested that the pooled effect size for the association between television viewing and language was slightly modified when data from several studies were removed, with effect size ranging from -0.21 to -0.13.

    “Sensitivity analyses suggested that the pooled effect size estimation for the association between television viewing and language was slightly modified when data from several studies were removed, with effect size ranging from -0.21 to -0.13.25,34,55,57,59,60,67”
  • Our results concur with previous research showing an inverse association of television viewing with composite scores, language, and mathematics.

    “Regarding the association between the duration of individual screen-based activities and academic performance, our results concur with previous research showing an inverse association of television viewing with composite scores, 29,64,66,71 language, 59,67 and mathematics.59,77”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, N.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Shin, Nary
Venue
The Journal of Genetic Psychology
Published
2004-12
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
367-382
ISSN
  • 0022-1325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0896
OpenAlex
W2002874583
Cited by
112
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
32.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Genetic Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
Keywords
children's television viewing, academic performance, elementary school students, time displacement, cognitive effort, passivity, homework time, reading for pleasure, impulsivity, media effects on learning
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Leisure Activities, Male, Prospective Studies, Reading, Schools, Students, Television, Time Factors, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review