CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 790

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship.

Ainley, Mary, Hidi, Suzanne, Berndorff, Dagmar·2002·Journal of Educational Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although influences of interest on learning are well documented, mediating processes have not been clarified. The authors investigated how individual and situational interest factors contribute to topic interest and text learning. Traditional self-report measures were combined with novel interactive computerized methods of recording cognitive and affective reactions to science and popular culture texts, monitoring their development in real time. Australian and Canadian students read 4 expository texts. Both individual interest variables and specific text titles influenced topic interest. Examination of processes predictive of text learning indicated that topic interest was related to affective response, affect to persistence, and persistence to learning. Combining self-rating scales with dynamic measures of student activities provided new insight into how interest influences learning. It has been widely noted in the literature that after decades of neglect, the concept of interest has been revived by investigators

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Ainley, 1997, Between the lines (BTL)
  2. 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1 · DOI
  3. Ainley, 2002, Dynamic measures for studying interest and learning., Vol. 12, 43
  4. Alexander, 1997, Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces., Vol. 10, 213
  5. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.435 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.559 · DOI
  7. Anderson. 1987 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF01537054 · DOI
  9. Bandura, 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.66 · DOI
  11. 10.1207/s15326985ep3402_2 · DOI
  12. Berlyne, 1960, Conflict, arousal and curiosity., 10.1037/11164-000 · DOI
  13. Berlyne, 1962, Uncertainty and epistemic curiosity., The British Journal of Psychology, 53, 27, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1962.tb00811.x · DOI
  14. Beswick, 1971, Cognitive process theory of individual differences in curiosity., 156
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.904 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92 · DOI
  17. 10.2307/1170506 · DOI
  18. Hidi, 1992, Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing., 215
  19. 10.1016/S0364-0213(86)80003-9 · DOI
  20. 10.2307/747644 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1170660 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hunt, 1971, Towards a history of intrinsic motivation., 1
  23. 10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.120 · DOI
  24. Izard, 1972, Anxiety: A variable combination of interacting fundamental emotions., Vol. 1, 55, 10.1016/B978-0-12-657401-2.50010-1 · DOI
  25. Joreskog, 1999, LISREL 8.30: Interactive LISREL for MS Windows 3.1 + Windows '95, Windows '98 and Windows NT
  26. Krapp. Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. 14 23 1999 · DOI
  27. Krapp, 1992, Interest, learning and development., 3
  28. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/BF02139075 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00991651 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424 · DOI
  32. Pekrun, 2000, A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions., 143
  33. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1017 · DOI
  34. Renninger, 1992, Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice.
  35. Renninger, 2000, Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation., 373, 10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50035-0 · DOI
  36. Renninger. 1998 · DOI
  37. Rowe, 2000, Simultaneous estimation of interdependent effects among multilevel composite variables in psychological research: An annotated example of the application of multilevel structural equation modeling., 1
  38. 10.1006/ceps.1996.0002 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90030-8 · DOI
  40. Schiefele, 1997, Motivation and knowledge acquisition: Searching for mediating processes., Vol. 10, 251
  41. Schiefele, 1992, Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research., 183
  42. Schraw. The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall. 26 1 1994 · DOI
  43. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.705 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00031-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1598/RRQ.34.2.4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D.
ORCID
Ainley, Mary
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2002-09
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
545-561
ISSN
  • 1939-2176
  • 0022-0663
DOI
10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
Cited by
790
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review