Cited by 12Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsMedia Influence and HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Social presence and use of Internet-delivered interventions: a multi-method approach

Open access
Crutzen, Rik, Cyr, Dianne, Larios, Hector, Ruiter, Robert A. C., de Vries, Nanne K.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Internet-delivered interventions can effectively change health risk behaviors and their determinants, but adherence to intervention websites once they are accessed is very low. This study tests whether and how social presence elements can increase website use. METHODS: A website about Hepatitis A, B, and C virus infections was used in a preparatory lab-based eye-tracking study assessing whether social presence elements attract participants' attention, because this is a prerequisite for affecting website use. In the following field study, 482 participants representative of the Dutch population were randomized to either a website with or a website without social presence elements. Participants completed a questionnaire of validated measures regarding user perceptions immediately after exposure to the website. Server registrations were used to assess website use. RESULTS: Participants in the experimental condition focused on the social presence elements, both in terms of frequency (F(1, 98) = 40.34, p<.001) and duration (F(1, 88) = 39.99, p<.001), but did not differ in website use in comparison with the control condition; neither in terms of the number of pages visited (t(456) = 1.44, p = .15), nor in terms of time on the website (t(456) = 0.01, p = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Adding social presence elements did not affect actual use of an intervention website within a public health context. Possible reasons are limited attention for these elements in comparison with the main text and the utilitarian value of intervention websites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0057067

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surrogate measures of engagement can be difficult to interpret and differences in attention may not always translate into differences in intervention use or other measures of engagement.

    “These surrogate measures of engagement can be difficult to interpret and differences in attention may not always translate into differences in intervention use (or other measures of engagement) 40 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [52]Sheeran P (2002) Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In: Hewstone M, Stroebe W, editors. European Review of Social Psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 1–36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crutzen, R., Cyr, D., Larios, H., Ruiter, R. A. C., & de Vries, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Crutzen, Rik
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-02-20
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e57067
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003628279
Cited by
12
References
65
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Summit (Simon Fraser University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
social presence, online intervention, internet use, user engagement, eye tracking, hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A, health information websites, user perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Perception, Health Behavior, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review