Cited by 570Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPhysical Education and PedagogyPhysical Activity and Health

The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model.

Hagger, Martin S., Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D., Culverhouse, Trudi, Biddle, Stuart J. H.·2003·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The trans-contextual model proposes that young people's perceived autonomy support in physical education will affect their perceived locus of causality, intentions, and physical activity behavior in leisure time. High school students completed measures of perceived autonomy support and perceived locus of causality in physical education. One week later, participants' perceived locus of causality and constructs from the theory of planned behavior were assessed in leisure time. Leisure-time physical activity behavior was measured 5 weeks later. Perceived autonomy support in physical education affected leisure-time physical activity directly and indirectly through a motivational sequence involving internal perceived locus of causality, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and intentions. Results support the trans-contextual model indicating that perceived autonomy support in an educational context influences motivation in a leisure-time context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.784

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2003-12
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
784-795
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2135267497
Cited by
570
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
perceived autonomy support, physical education, leisure-time physical activity, trans-contextual model, locus of causality, theory of planned behavior, physical activity intention, motivation, high school students, attitudes, perceived behavioral control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review