Cited by 343Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learned helplessness through modeling: The role of perceived similarity in competence.

Brown, Irvin, Inouye, Dillon K.·1978·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.900

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Brown, I., & Inouye, D. K.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1978-08
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
900-908
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2159704071
Cited by
343
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
learned helplessness, modeling, perceived similarity, perceived competence, social learning, observational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review