Cited by 290Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models

Fredricks, Arlene J., Dossett, Dennis L.·1983·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.501

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar results to Bentler and Speckart were later reported by Bagozzi (1981) and by Fredricks and Dossett (1983).

    “Similar results were later reported by Bagozzi (1981) and by Fredricks and Dossett (1983).”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Fredricks and Dossett (1983)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fredricks, A. J., & Dossett, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1983-09
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
501-512
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2093002426
Cited by
290
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
attitude-behavior relationship, theory comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review