Cited by 763Jury Decision Making ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudenceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Pennington, Nancy, Hastie, Reid·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories could be constructed affected verdict judgments and the impact of credibility evidence. Memory for evidence in all conditions was equivalent, implying that the story structure was a mediator of decisions and of the impact of credibility evidence. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss evaluated the evidence in 3 ways. When Ss made a global judgment at the end of the case, their judgment processes followed the prescriptions of the Story Model, not of Bayesian or linear updating models. When Ss made item-by-item judgments after each evidence block, linear anchor and adjust models described their judgments. In conditions in which story construction strategies were more likely to be used, story completeness had greater effects on decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“Causal calculi in the form of algebraic computations (e.g., Anderson, 1974; Einhorn & Hogarth, 1985) or inductive rules (e.g., Kelley, 1973 ) describe how stimulus information is translated into explanations, predictions, and assignments of responsibility.”
Background
Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,646
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400871957 · Cited by 1,508

Show all 51 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 763

Introduction and validation of the juror decision scale (JDS): an empirical investigation of the story model.
Willmott, D., Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., & Woodfield, R. (2018) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.03.004 · Cited by 75
Commonsense rape judgments: An empathy-complexity theory of rape juror story making.
Olsen-Fulero, L., & Fulero, S. M. (1997) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.402 · Cited by 79
Probabilistic alternatives to Bayesianism: the case of explanationism
Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00459 · Cited by 75
Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation
Glassner, A., Weinstock, M. P., & Neuman, Y. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709904x22278 · Cited by 76
Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.
Matute, H., Vegas, S., & Marez, P.-J. D. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.714 · Cited by 74
Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence.
Smith, B. C., Penrod, S., Otto, A. L., & Park, R. C. (1996) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499132 · Cited by 73
When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt.
Appleby, S. C., & Kassin, S. M. (2016) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000080 · Cited by 71
Advancing the Narrative Policy Framework? The Musings of a Potentially Unreliable Narrator
Jones, M. D. (2018) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12296 · Cited by 71
The impact of pictures on narrative- and list-based impression formation: A process interference model
Adaval, R., Isbell, L. M., & Wyer, R. S. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.005 · Cited by 70
Narrative-based representations of social knowledge: Their construction and use in comprehension, memory, and judgment
Wyer, R. S., Adaval, R., & Colcombe, S. J. (2002) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80005-3 · Cited by 70
Explaining Routinized Decision Making
Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Hohle, C. (2002) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354302012004294 · Cited by 68
On decision making without likelihood judgment
Rottenstreich, Y., & Kivetz, R. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.06.004 · Cited by 62
The Effect of Decision Strategy on Deciding to Defer Choice
Dhar, R. (1996) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199612)9:4 · Cited by 158
Best, Second-Best, and Good-Enough Explanations: How They Matter to Reasoning
Douven, I., & Mirabile, P. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000545 · Cited by 49
Timing of Eyewitness Expert Testimony, Jurors' Need for Cognition, and Case Strength as Determinants of Trial Verdicts.
Leippe, M. R., Eisenstadt, D., Rauch, S. M., & Seib, H. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.524 · Cited by 61
The role of explanatory considerations in updating
Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.017 · Cited by 61
The distortion of criteria after decision-making
Phillips, F. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00015-8 · Cited by 58
It’s the End of the World and They Know It: How Dystopian Fiction Shapes Political Attitudes
Jones, C. W., & Paris, C. (2018) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592718002153 · Cited by 31
Drivers of student engagement in higher education: a behavioral reasoning theory perspective
Tani, M., Gheith, M. H., & Papaluca, O. (2021) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00647-7 · Cited by 59
The Burdens of Proof
Nance, D. A. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316415771 · Cited by 58
Mind-Society
Thagard, P. R. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190678722.001.0001 · Cited by 56
Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE) Versus Explaining for the Best Inference (EBI)
Wilkenfeld, D. A., & Lombrozo, T. (2015) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9784-4 · Cited by 57
The reasons behind change recipients’ behavioral reactions: a longitudinal investigation
Vakola, M. (2016) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-02-2013-0058 · Cited by 56
“How did you feel?”: Increasing child sexual abuse witnesses' production of evaluative information.
Lyon, T. D., Scurich, N., Choi, K. C. K., Handmaker, S., & Blank, R. (2012) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/h0093986 · Cited by 55
Transformation in narrative thought during adolescence: The structure and content of story compositions.
McKeough, A., & Genereux, R. L. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.537 · Cited by 54
Computer-animated displays and the jury: Facilitative and prejudicial effects.
Kassin, S. M., & Dunn, M. (1997) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024838715221 · Cited by 53
The Psychology of the Foreign Exchange Market
Oberlechner, T. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 52
Early Evidence on the Effects of Critical Audit Matters on Auditor Liability
Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2015) · Current Issues in Auditing · doi:10.2308/ciia-51369 · Cited by 53
A ceiling or consistency effect for the comprehension of jury instructions.
English, P. W., & Sales, B. D. (1997) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.381 · Cited by 52
The heuristic conception of inference to the best explanation
Dellsén, F. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0933-2 · Cited by 52
Decision waves: consumer decisions in today's complex world
Lye, A. R., Shao, W., Rundle-Thiele, S. R., & Fausnaugh, C. J. (2005) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560510572098 · Cited by 54
Cognitive and social processes in decision making.
Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-013 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation
Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Bart Verheij, A. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-014-9161-7 · Cited by 51
Crime prototypes, objective versus subjective culpability, and a commonsense balance.
Finkel, N. J., & Groscup, J. (1997) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024830413404 · Cited by 50
Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections.
Finkel, N. J. (2000) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.591 · Cited by 49
Measuring Narrative Believability: Development and Validation of the Narrative Believability Scale (NBS-12)
Yale, R. N. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12035 · Cited by 49
Understanding behavior makes it more normal
Ahn, W., Novick, L. R., & Kim, N. S. (2003) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196541 · Cited by 49
Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault–Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame
Stuart, S., McKimmie, B. M., & Masser, B. (2016) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260516640777 · Cited by 56
Attention and moral behavior
Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.008 · Cited by 58
Building mental health professionals' decisional models into tests of predictive validity: The accuracy of contextualized predictions of violence.
Skeem, J. L., Mulvey, E. P., & Lidz, C. W. (2000) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1005513818748 · Cited by 48
How a “Reasonable Doubt” Instruction Affects Decisions of Guilt
Wright, D. B., & Hall, M. (2007) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530701331254 · Cited by 46
The Construction of Justice: A Case Study of Public Participation in Land Management
Cvetkovich, G. T., & Earle, T. C. (1994) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02425.x · Cited by 46
The influence of opening statement/closing argument organizational strategy on juror verdict and damage awards.
Spiecker, S. C., & Worthington, D. L. (2003) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024041201605 · Cited by 45
Beliefs about error rates and human judgment in forensic science
Ribeiro, G., Tangen, J. M., & McKimmie, B. M. (2019) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.034 · Cited by 45
Narrative Transportation in Concept Tests for Really New Products: The Moderating Effect of Reader–Protagonist Similarity
van den Hende, E. A., Dahl, D. W., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Snelders, D. (2012) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00961.x · Cited by 46
Legal blame: how jurors think and talk about accidents
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2417 · Cited by 46
Measuring What is Top of MindPreprint
Haaland, I., Roth, C., Stantcheva, S., & Wohlfart, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4827419 · Cited by 47
Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian network
Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Bart Verheij, A. (2013) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/2514601.2514618 · Cited by 43
Societal Responses to Sexual Violence Against Women: Rape Myths and the “Real Rape” Stereotype
Krahé, B. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_24 · Cited by 43
Living and dormant collective memories as contexts of history learning
Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. A. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.005 · Cited by 43
Stickier Priors: The Effects of Nonanalytic versus Analytic Thinking in New Product Forecasting
Bolton, L. E. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.1.65.19129 · Cited by 43
Juror competence in civil trials: Effects of preinstruction and evidence technicality.
ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & Bourgeois, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.78.1.14 · Cited by 43
Death narratives and cervical cancer: Impact of character death on narrative processing and HPV vaccination.
Krakow, M., Yale, R. N., Torres, D. P., Christy, K. R., & Jensen, J. D. (2017) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000498 · Cited by 42
Searching for certainty in an uncertain world: the difficulty of giving up the experiential for the rational mode of thinking
Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.434 · Cited by 41
The Economics of Meaning
Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G. F., & McCafferty, J. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199257072.003.0002 · Cited by 41
Optimizing group learning: An evolutionary computing approach
Douven, I. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.002 · Cited by 41
Sexual harassment stories: Testing a story-mediated model of juror decision-making in civil litigation.
Huntley, J. E., & Costanzo, M. A. (2003) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1021674811225 · Cited by 39
The Role of Comprehension Processes in Communication and Persuasion
Wyer, R. S., & Shrum, L. J. (2014) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.912584 · Cited by 36
5 Judges as Members of Small Groups
Martinek, W. L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0005 · Cited by 36
7 Is There a Psychology of Judging?
Schauer, F. F. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0007 · Cited by 36
Tracking phantastic objects: A computer algorithmic investigation of narrative evolution in unstructured data sources
Tuckett, D., Smith, R. E., & Nyman, R. (2014) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.001 · Cited by 36
The Impact of Rape Myth Education on Jury Decision-Making: A Systematic Review’,
Hudspith, L. F., Wager, N., Willmott, D., & Gallagher, B. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380241270082 · Cited by 36
Comparing the effectiveness of Henderson instructions and expert testimony: Which safeguard improves jurors’ evaluations of eyewitness evidence?
Jones, A. M., Bergold, A. N., Dillon, M. K., & Penrod, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-016-9279-6 · Cited by 41
Bringing the Jury to the Scene of the Crime: Memory and Decision-Making in a Simulated Crime Scene
Reichherzer, C., Cunningham, A., Coleman, T., Cao, R., McManus, K., Sheppard, D., Kohler, M. J., Billinghurst, M., & Thomas, B. H. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445464 · Cited by 41
Construction of probabilistic inferences by constraint satisfaction?
Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2008) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 34
Mock jury attitudes towards credibility, age, and guilt in a fictional child sexual assault scenario
Tabak, S. J., & Klettke, B. (2013) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12035 · Cited by 34
Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
Tweed, M., & WILKINSON, T. J. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1583-1 · Cited by 36
Brand gestalt scale development and validation: A takeoff from tourism destination branding
Mandagi, D. W., Centeno, D. D. G., & Indrajit, I. (2021) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100539 · Cited by 43
Purchasing Managers' Perceived Bias in Supplier‐Selected Referrals
Hada, M., Grewal, R., & Lilien, A. G. L. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12007 · Cited by 34
Laws of cognition and the cognition of law
Kahan, D. M. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.025 · Cited by 34
Story Similarity in Arguments from Analogy
Walton, D. (2012) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v32i2.3159 · Cited by 33
Coaching experience: Examining its role in coaches’ decision making
Vergeer, I., & Lyle, J. (2009) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2009.9671918 · Cited by 33
Cognitive Approaches to Judgment and Decision Making
Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1995) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60306-0 · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Reasoning About the Removal of a Child From Home: A Comparison of Police Officers and Social Workers1
Mandel, D. R., Lehman, D. R., & Yuille, J. C. (1995) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02652.x · Cited by 33
The ecological rationality of explanatory reasoning
Douven, I. (2019) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.06.004 · Cited by 33
Issue Framing
Nelson, T. E. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0012 · Cited by 32
Argumentation Schemes for Argument from Analogy
Walton, D. (2014) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06334-8_2 · Cited by 32
Permitting jury discussions during trial: Impact of the Arizona Reform.
Hannaford, P. L., Hans, V. P., & Munsterman, G. T. (2000) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1005540305832 · Cited by 32
The gist of juries: Testing a model of damage award decision making.
Reyna, V. F., Hans, V. P., Corbin, J. C., Yeh, R., Lin, K., & Royer, C. E. (2015) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000048 · Cited by 32
When being wise after the event results in injustice: Evidence for hindsight bias in judges’ negligence assessments.
Oeberst, A., & Goeckenjan, I. (2016) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000091 · Cited by 32
Younger and Older Jurors: The Influence of Environmental Supports on Memory Performance and Decision Making in Complex Trials
Fitzgerald, J. M. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.6.p323 · Cited by 31
Effects of prior interpretation on situation assessment in crime analysis
Kerstholt, J. H., & Eikelboom, A. R. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.570 · Cited by 31
Persuasion by Causal Arguments: The Motivating Role of Perceived Causal Expertise
Tobin, S. J., & Raymundo, M. M. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.105 · Cited by 31
Rational Argument
Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0015 · Cited by 32
Primacy and recency effects in extinction and latent inhibition: A selective review with implications for models of learning
Pineño, O., & Miller, R. R. (2005) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.006 · Cited by 36
Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction: A Behavioural Perspective on a Conflict Between American and Continental European LawPreprint
Engel, C. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1283503 · Cited by 31
Naturalistic Decision Making in Forensic Science: Toward a Better Understanding of Decision Making by Forensic Team Leaders
Helsloot, I., & Groenendaal, J. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01714.x · Cited by 30
The impact of discredited evidence
Lagnado, D. A., & Harvey, N. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.6.1166 · Cited by 30
Determinants of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system adoption intention: A behavioral reasoning theory perspective
Li, W., & Wang, J. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102643 · Cited by 28
Of fluency, beauty, and truth: Inferences from metacognitive experiences.
Schwarz, N. (2018) · Cited by 29
Jurors' intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication injury decision making
Sunwolf, & Seibold, D. R. (1998) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759809376455 · Cited by 29
1 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry
Baum, L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0001 · Cited by 31
Causal Perceptions of Intertrait Relations: The Glue that Holds Person Types Together
Sedikides, C., & Anderson, C. A. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294203007 · Cited by 29
Fact-checking in the age of AI: Reducing biases with non-human information sources
Moon, W.-K., & Kahlor, L. A. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102760 · Cited by 34
Have you considered the opposite? A debiasing strategy for judgment in criminal investigation
Fahsing, I., Rachlew, A., & May, L. (2021) · The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles · doi:10.1177/0032258x211038888 · Cited by 34
Storytelling im Behavioral Branding
Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. P. (2011) · Gabler Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-7134-0_22 · Cited by 27
Causality as an influence on hindsight bias: An empirical examination of judges' evaluation of professional audit judgment
Jennings, M. M., Lowe, D. J., & Reckers, P. M. J. (1998) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/s0278-4254(97)10003-5 · Cited by 27
Psychological-State Theories about Significant Others: Implications for the Content and Structure of Significant-Other Representations
Chen, S. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203255226 · Cited by 29
Disability assessments: Effects of response mode and experience
Kerstholt, J. H., de Boer, W. E. L., & Jansen, N. J. M. (2006) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280500163794 · Cited by 27
Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability
Martire, K. A., Ballantyne, K. N., Bali, A. S., Edmond, G., Kemp, R. I., & Found, B. J. (2019) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877 · Cited by 27

Authors: Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1992-02
Volume: 62
Issue: 2
Pages: 189-206
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
OpenAlex: W1984737313
Cited by: 761
References: 51
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI: 103.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: story model, jury decision-making, narrative construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks