Cited by 763Jury Decision Making ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudenceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Pennington, Nancy, Hastie, Reid·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories could be constructed affected verdict judgments and the impact of credibility evidence. Memory for evidence in all conditions was equivalent, implying that the story structure was a mediator of decisions and of the impact of credibility evidence. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss evaluated the evidence in 3 ways. When Ss made a global judgment at the end of the case, their judgment processes followed the prescriptions of the Story Model, not of Bayesian or linear updating models. When Ss made item-by-item judgments after each evidence block, linear anchor and adjust models described their judgments. In conditions in which story construction strategies were more likely to be used, story completeness had greater effects on decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“Causal calculi in the form of algebraic computations (e.g., Anderson, 1974; Einhorn & Hogarth, 1985) or inductive rules (e.g., Kelley, 1973 ) describe how stimulus information is translated into explanations, predictions, and assignments of responsibility.”
Background
Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,646
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400871957 · Cited by 1,508

Show all 51 references

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 763

Tribunal simulado: efeito da ordem das teses e do antecedente do réu
Pilati, R., Silvino, A. M. D., Miura, M. A., & Caldas, L. S. (2010) · Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) · doi:10.1590/s0103-863x2010000200007 · Cited by 2
12 Every Jury Trial Is a Bench Trial: Judicial Engineering of Jury Disputes
Rowland, C. K., Traficanti, T. M., & Vernon, E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0012 · Cited by 2
Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
Laas, O. (2016) · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy · doi:10.4000/ejpap.643 · Cited by 2
The Use of Evidence in Young Adolescents' Argumentation
Moore, W. (2013) · doi:10.7916/d8bp0916 · Cited by 2
Pre- and Midtrial Publicity in the Age of Internet and Social Media
Daftary‐Kapur, T., & Penrod, S. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190658113.003.0008 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Psychological Injury Evidence and Jurors’ Schemas on Civil Case Decisions
Vallano, J. P., & Slapinski, K. A. (2018) · Psychological Injury and Law · doi:10.1007/s12207-018-9330-1 · Cited by 2
Modeling a satisficing judge
Engel, C., & Gueth, W. (2018) · Rationality and Society · doi:10.1177/1043463118767406 · Cited by 2
Investors' Responses to Management Getting Out Ahead of Negative Media Stories: The Moderating Effects of Management's Action Plan and the Media's Focus
Cikurel, D., Fanning, K., & Jackson, K. E. (2021) · Journal of Financial Reporting · doi:10.2308/jfr-2019-0011 · Cited by 2
The Story Model of Judicial Decision-Making and Reasoning With Evidence
Majeed, N., & Mahmood, A. K. (2021) · Global Legal Studies Review · doi:10.31703/glsr.2021(vi-ii).02 · Cited by 2
Defendant’s Mens rea or Attractiveness: Which Influences Mock Juror Decisions?
Taylor, S., Lui, Y. L., & Workman, L. (2018) · Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal · doi:10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00185 · Cited by 2
The dispositional need for cognitive closure indirectly predicts mock jurors’ sentencing decisions through right-wing authoritarianism
West, M. P., & Yelderman, L. A. (2023) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2023.2175072 · Cited by 2
Unreliable informant testimony.
Neuschatz, J. S., Jones, N. J., Wetmore, S. A., & McClung, J. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13085-010 · Cited by 2
Race salience and attorney statements: the unique role of defense opening statements and closing arguments
Gamblin, B. W., & Kehn, A. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01147-8 · Cited by 2
The Social Science of the Death Penalty: Before, during, and after Trial
West, M. P., & Miller, M. K. (2020) · Advances in psychology and law · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54678-6_7 · Cited by 2
Het effect van een pro Justitia-rapportage op de bewijsbeslissing: een empirische verkenning
van Es, R., Doorn, J. V., de Keijser, J., & Kunst, M. J. J. (2020) · Recht der Werkelijkheid · doi:10.5553/rdw/138064242020041002002 · Cited by 2
Auditor interventions that reduce auditor liability judgments
Chambers, V. A., & Reckers, P. M. J. (2022) · Advances in Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2022.100614 · Cited by 2
The Narrative Dimension
Nissan, E. (2011) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_5 · Cited by 2
Translator, traitor: A critical ethnography of a U.S. terrorism trial
Hess, M. (2014) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · Cited by 2
A Psychology and Law of Fact finding?
Carson, D. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470713068.ch7 · Cited by 2
A CASE OF EVERYDAY JUSTICE: FREE PRESS V. FAIR TRIAL IN A BURGLARY CASE
Miller, J., & Simons, G. (1997) · Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1080/0735648x.1997.9721562 · Cited by 2
Either, Or: Exploration of an Emerging Decision TheoryPreprint
Fioretti, G. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1314352 · Cited by 2
The Effects of Managerss Strategic Responses to Media-Disclosed Negative Information on Investorss JudgmentsPreprint
Fanning, K., & Jackson, K. E. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2620304 · Cited by 2
Defendant Should Have the Last Word – Experimentally Manipulating Order and Provisional Assessment of the Facts in Criminal ProcedurePreprint
Engel, C., Glöckner, A., & Timme, S. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3077855 · Cited by 2
Whither Notice Pleading?: Pleading Practice in the Days Before TwomblyPreprint
Cantone, J. A., Cecil, J. S., & Jani, D. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2494400 · Cited by 2
Facilitating falsification in legal decision making
Maegherman, E. (2020) · doi:10.26481/dis.20210114em · Cited by 3
Aboriginal Canadians in the Courtroom: Effects of Defendant and Eyewitness Race on Juror Decision-Making in a Criminal Trial
Ewanation, L. A. (2016) · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11576 · Cited by 2
Explanation
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118661666.ch34 · Cited by 2
Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in JudgingPreprint
Robbennolt, J. K., MacCoun, R. J., & Darley, J. M. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1133184 · Cited by 2
Compounding Prejudice? Investigating Canadian Mock Juror Perceptions of Victim Race and Work in the Sex Trade
Knoop, J. (2019) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13708 · Cited by 2
Narratives and ValuationsPreprint
Morag, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4610995 · Cited by 2
A descriptive, practical, hybrid argumentation model to assist with the formulation of defensible assessments in uncertain sense-making environments: an initial evaluation
Groenewald, C., Attfield, S., Passmore, P., Wong, B. L. W., Qazi, N., & Kodagoda, N. (2018) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-018-0495-x · Cited by 1
Coherence and Credibility in the Story-Model of Jurors’ Decision-Making: Does Mental Simulation Really Drive the Evaluation of the Evidence?
Vorms, M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2019) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32722-4_7 · Cited by 1
Adaptive lie detection and perceived prevalence of false reports in evaluation of sexual offense allegations.
Helm, R. K. (2023) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/mac0000095 · Cited by 1
Law and order: the timing of mitigating evidence affects punishment decisions
Conder, E. B., Jaeger, C. B., & Lane, J. D. (2023) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2023.2172077 · Cited by 1
The role of meeting management in group decision-making: lessons learnt from UK fostering and adoption panels
Weekes, A. P. (2023) · Journal of Social Work Practice · doi:10.1080/02650533.2023.2206116 · Cited by 1
Opening the Black Box of Judicial Decision-Making in Cases with Forensic Mental Health Reports: A Qualitative Study from the Netherlands
van Es, R., Doorn, J. V., Kunst, M. J. J., & Keijser, J. W. D. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/24732850.2023.2249455 · Cited by 1
Legal and Extralegal Factors that Affect Jurors’ Decisions
Schweitzer, K. A., Burd, K. A., & Nunez, N. L. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009119375.024 · Cited by 1
Effects of Verbal Framing of Video and Attitudes Toward Police on Mock Jurors' Judgements of Body‐Worn Camera Video
Park, J., Feigenson, N. R., & Cheng, N. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.70007 · Cited by 1
Theory of Evidence-Based Narrative
Yi, J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-2026-5_8 · Cited by 1
What Do We Think About Women Who Kill? Validation of the Attitudes Towards Female Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Homicide Scale
Crosland, S., Tzani, C., & Ιωάννου, Μ. (2025) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605251365649 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Expert Testimony and Victim Statements on Evaluations of Victimization Statements and Legal Judgment: An Introduction to Korea’s Crime Victimization Assessment System and Its Utility
Han, Y. (2025) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2025.2551183 · Cited by 1
Contemporaneous notes and juror decision-making: Do reminiscence and expert testimony play a role?
Lin, S., & Paterson, H. M. (2025) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2025.2568400 · Cited by 1
Jury Decision Making
Willmott, D., Curley, L. J., & Widanaralalage, B. K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03312-3_19 · Cited by 3
What do we know about the effectiveness of juror education in rape and serious sexual offence trials?
Leverick, F., Chalmers, J., Keane, E. P. H., & Kinghan, J. (2026) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/13657127261441447 · Cited by 1
Models of Forming an Opinion
Nissan, E. (2011) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_2 · Cited by 1
Jurors’ Subjective Certainty and Standards of Proof: The Role of Emotion and Severity of Charge in Subjective Probability Judgment
Choi, Y. (2013) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 1
Reasoning with and without Reasons: The Effects of Professional Culture and Information Access in Educational and Clinical Settings
Saferstein, B. (2014) · Cited by 1
The Cases for and against Blindfolding the Jury11This chapter is adapted, in part, from three prior publications: Diamond and Casper, 1992, Diamond et al., 1989, and Diamond and Vidmar, 2001. I use the term blindfolding, rather than blinding, because when information is withheld from an individual, the individual may fill in the missing information based on previous experience and outside knowledge, sometimes correctly and sometimes incorrectly (i.e., peeks through the blindfold). A decision maker who peeks is not effectively blinded.
Diamond, S. S. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802460-7.00017-6 · Cited by 1
16 Expertise of Court Judges
Shanteau, J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0016 · Cited by 1
Information and Economics: A New Way to Think About Expectations and to Improve Economic Prediction 1
Tuckett, D., Ormerod, P., Nyman, R., & Smith, R. E. (2015) · Cited by 1
Examining the “CSI Effect”: The Impact of Crime Drama Viewership on Perceptions of Forensics and Science
Ferris, A. L. (2011) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 1
Stories in Organizations
Thier, K. (2018) · Management for professionals · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-56383-0_2 · Cited by 1
The Information-Seeking Process of Moral Judgment
Guglielmo, S. (2012) · doi:10.7301/z09w0csp · Cited by 1
How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt
Holt, G. A., & Palmer, M. A. (2020) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2020.1837027 · Cited by 1
クチコミのナラティブ構造が受け手の評価に与える影響ブログ記事へのナラティブトランスポーテーション効果に注目して (1)
安藤, 和. (2015) · doi:10.11194/acs.21.1_2_25 · Cited by 1
Evidence Law and Empirical Psychology
Sevier, J. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0024 · Cited by 1
Le raisonnement probatoire et la « mise en récit » des preuves : présentation critique du story-model
Vorms, M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2022) · Droit et société · doi:10.3917/drs1.110.0087 · Cited by 1
Forensic Technologies in the Courtroom
Sainato, V. A., & Giner, J. A. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3025-2.ch020 · Cited by 1
Narrative Reasoning
(2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1818-3.ch006 · Cited by 1
Brand Management: From Storytelling to Strategic Narratives
Dominique‐Ferreira, S., Praça, S., & Prentice, C. (2022) · Springer series in design and innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06809-6_18 · Cited by 2
Los retos de la prueba pericial para asegurar un proceso neutro: mito y realidades de la teoría procesal
Moreno, J. P. G. (2023) · Revista Jurídica Austral · doi:10.26422/rja.2023.0401.gom · Cited by 1
The role of discrete emotional reactions to child sexual abuse (CSA) testimony in mock juror decision-making
Olaguez, A. P., Peplak, J., Lundon, G. M., & Klemfuss, J. Z. (2023) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2023.2292516 · Cited by 3
The virtual jury is out: How do mental health beliefs affect deliberations and verdicts
Hollands, C. (2023) · BPS Branch Awards · doi:10.53841/bpsba.2023.1.1.11 · Cited by 1
Pretrial Publicity’s Effects on Jurors’ and Judges’ Decisions
Ruva, C. L. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009119375.007 · Cited by 4
They may not believe you remembered that nose: juror perceptions of eyewitness’ featural justifications
Cops, M., Kehn, A., & Russell, T. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07469-9 · Cited by 1
Key Terms and Concepts
Beke, T. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01872-0_1 · Cited by 1
Reasoning and Justice
White, S. O. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1289-9_16 · Cited by 1
Group differences in fairness perceptions and decision making in voting rights cases.
Cole, A. P., & Thomas, E. A. C. (2006) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9046-8 · Cited by 1
Three Roads to Commitment: A Trimodal Theory of Decision Making
Cohen, M. S. (2011) · Cited by 1
18 Building a Better Judiciary
Farber, D. A., & Sherry, S. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0018 · Cited by 1
The Facts about Fiction: What Grissom Could Learn about Forensic Psychology
Ramsland, K. M. (2009) · The Journal of Psychiatry & Law · doi:10.1177/009318530903700104 · Cited by 1
Engineering
Thagard, P. R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190678722.003.0013 · Cited by 1
Sozialpsychologie bei Gericht
Pfundmair, M. (2020) · Die Wirtschaftspsychologie · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61796-0_6 · Cited by 1
A replication about cause–effect linkage benefits and managers’ strategic judgments
Knox, B. D. (2021) · Journal of Management Control · doi:10.1007/s00187-021-00315-6 · Cited by 1
I don't know if you did it, but I know why: A 'motive' preference at multiple stages of the legal-investigative process.
Liefgreen, A., Yousif, S. R., Keil, F. C., & Lagnado, D. A. (2020) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 1
Quantifying an implicit legal threshold and mental representations of ‘Innocent:’ a comparison of implicit and theoretical thresholds for a legal decision
Han, Y. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology · doi:10.1080/14789949.2021.1925730 · Cited by 1
A Tale of Two Outcomes: Understanding and Countering Extremist Narratives
Roseman, I. J., Rudolph, B., Steele, A. K., & Katz, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59698-9_2 · Cited by 2
The influence of event order on the narratives jurors construct and tell in cases of rape
Lee, H. D. H., Tangen, J. M., McKimmie, B. M., & Masser, B. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2022.2109633 · Cited by 2
Provided notes as an alternative to juror notetaking : the effects of deliberation & trial complexity
Kelly, E. (2010) · Cited by 1
La construcción psicosociológica de la "subjetividad marginal" en la España de finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX
Alonso, B. J. (2010) · Cited by 1
Does Affective Contagion Promote Coherent Political ThinkingPreprint
Erişen, C., Lodge, M. G., & Taber, C. S. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 1
Directing jurors in England and Wales : the effect of narrativisation on comprehension
Nelson, S. (2013) · ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) · Cited by 1
Memory and judgment bias in retrospective evaluations
Aldrovandi, S., Poirier, M., & Ayton, P. (2007) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e722292011-139 · Cited by 1
Evaluating the Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Mock-Jury Deliberations
Staggs, S. M. (2017) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 1
The Subsumptive Constraints Account of why explaining "why?" helps learning
Williams, J. J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Evaluating the Impact of Clinical Evidence about FASD on Attributions and Decisions in a Criminal Justice Context
Mullally, K. (2019) · The Atrium (University of Guelph) · Cited by 1
Investigating the persuasive impact of online textual content : A narrative theory approach
Cassar, M. L. (2019) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) · Cited by 1
What the Judge Argues is Not What the Judge Thinks – Eye Tracking as a Window into Judicial Decision MakingPreprint
Engel, C., & Rahal, R.-M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3526696 · Cited by 1
The impact of gender stereotypes on perceptions of, and responses to, same-sex intimate partner violence
Stuart, S. (2020) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2020.1034 · Cited by 1
The role of pre-trial attitudes about forensic science evidence: Developing and testing a forensic evidence evaluation bias scale
Smith, L. L. (2011) · Figshare · Cited by 1
Book Review: Turning Our Minds to Minding the Law
Nixon, C. L., & Landman, J. (2003) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1024204221555 · Cited by 1
Judgment Frequency Effects in Causal Learning
Perales, J. C., Catena, A., & Maldonado, A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1795 · Cited by 1
Storytelling im Behavioral Branding
Wentzel, D., Tomczak, T., & Herrmann, A. P. (2009) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-8744-0_22 · Cited by 1
Memory, History and Narrative: Shifts of Meaning when (Re)constructing the Past
de Luna, I. B., & Rosa, A. (2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e617732012-011 · Cited by 1
Why Wasn’t O. J. Convicted? Emotional Coherence in Legal Inference
(2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3566.003.0012 · Cited by 1
Introduction
(2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.002.0008 · Cited by 1
How Do Jurors Evaluate Memory Evidence? An Open-Ended Approach To Investigating Beliefs About Memory That Jurors Bring To The Courtroom
Weir, E. (2023) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.22396048 · Cited by 1
Jury Decision‐making
Kapardis, A. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394260669.ch4 · Cited by 1
Indigenous Canadians take the Stand: The Influence of Age and Race on Mock-Juror Perceptions and Verdict Decisions
Vettese, A. (2024) · doi:10.22215/etd/2024-15924 · Cited by 1
Limits of Interventions in AI-Assisted Decision Making
Shrestha, S., Ahn, E., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2026) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v9i4.43309

Authors: Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1992-02
Volume: 62
Issue: 2
Pages: 189-206
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
OpenAlex: W1984737313
Cited by: 761
References: 51
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI: 103.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: story model, jury decision-making, narrative construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks