Cited by 763Jury Decision Making ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudenceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Pennington, Nancy, Hastie, Reid·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories could be constructed affected verdict judgments and the impact of credibility evidence. Memory for evidence in all conditions was equivalent, implying that the story structure was a mediator of decisions and of the impact of credibility evidence. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss evaluated the evidence in 3 ways. When Ss made a global judgment at the end of the case, their judgment processes followed the prescriptions of the Story Model, not of Bayesian or linear updating models. When Ss made item-by-item judgments after each evidence block, linear anchor and adjust models described their judgments. In conditions in which story construction strategies were more likely to be used, story completeness had greater effects on decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“Causal calculi in the form of algebraic computations (e.g., Anderson, 1974; Einhorn & Hogarth, 1985) or inductive rules (e.g., Kelley, 1973 ) describe how stimulus information is translated into explanations, predictions, and assignments of responsibility.”
Background
Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,646
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400871957 · Cited by 1,508

Show all 51 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 763

How Evolution Outwits Bounded Rationality
Glöckner, A. (2008) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7735.003.0015 · Cited by 31
Narratives in supplier negotiations—The interplay of narrative design elements, structural power, and outcomes
Kaufmann, L., Schreiner, M., & Reimann, F. (2022) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12280 · Cited by 29
Juror decision-making within domestic sex trafficking cases: do pre-trial attitudes, gender, culture and right-wing authoritarianism predict believability assessments?
Stevens, K. L., Mojtahedi, D., & Austin, A. (2023) · Journal of Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1108/jcp-09-2023-0059 · Cited by 26
The Influence of Medical and Behavioral Evidence on Conviction Rates in Cases of Child Sexual Abuse
Lewis, T., Klettke, B., & Day, A. (2014) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2014.896843 · Cited by 26
Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law: Prototypes that are common, senseful, and not.
Finkel, N. J. (1997) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.2-3.461 · Cited by 26
Enhancing Juror Understanding of Probabilistic DNA Evidence
Dartnall, S., & Goodman‐Delahunty, J. (2006) · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1080/00450610609410635 · Cited by 26
Stories in Action.
Walsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26
Rape myths, jury deliberations, and conversation analysis: Examining conversational practices used to undermine rape complaints within (mock) jury deliberations
Richardson, E., Jenkins, L., & Willmott, D. (2025) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102461 · Cited by 25
Developing Conversational Agents for Use in Criminal Investigations
Hepenstal, S., Zhang, L., Kodagoda, N., & Wong, B. L. W. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3444369 · Cited by 25
Why side-effect outcomes do not affect intuitions about intentional actions: Properly shifting the focus from intentional outcomes back to intentional actions.
Laurent, S. M., Clark, B. A., & Schweitzer, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000011 · Cited by 25
Priming analogical reasoning with false memories
Howe, M. L., Garner, S. R., Threadgold, E., & Ball, L. J. (2015) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0513-7 · Cited by 26
Inferences about character and motive influence intentionality attributions about side effects
Hughes, J. S., & Trafimow, D. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02031.x · Cited by 24
Assessing Children’s Credibility in Courtroom Investigations of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse: Suggestibility, Plausibility, and Consistency
Denne, E., Sullivan, C. E., Ernest, K., & Stolzenberg, S. N. (2019) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559519872825 · Cited by 25
How Jurors Use and Misuse Character Evidence.
Hunt, J. S., & Budesheim, T. L. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.347 · Cited by 24
Can we trust intuitive jurors? An experimental analysisPreprint
Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 24
Crime trend perceptions, negative emotions, and public punitiveness: a survey experiment of information treatment
Shi, L. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-020-09454-7 · Cited by 23
Narrative expectations in financial forecasting
Johnson, S. G. B., & Tuckett, D. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2245 · Cited by 27
The psychology of telling murder stories: do we think in scripts, exemplars, or prototypes?
Wiener, R. L., Richmond, T. L., Seib, H. M., Rauch, S., & Hackney, A. A. (2002) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.476 · Cited by 23
Equal or proportional justice for accessories? Children's pearls of proportionate wisdom
Finkel, N. J., Liss, M. B., & Moran, V. R. (1997) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0193-3973(97)90037-x · Cited by 23
The Impact of Emotions on Juror Judgments and Decision-Making
Nunez, N. L., Estrada-Reynolds, V. C., Schweitzer, K. A., & Myers, B. P. (2016) · Advances in psychology and law · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43083-6_3 · Cited by 27
Optimality bias in moral judgment
Freitas, J. D., & Johnson, S. G. B. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.011 · Cited by 23
Narrative and Spatial Memory for Jury Viewings in a Reconstructed Virtual Environment
Reichherzer, C., Cunningham, A., Walsh, J. A., Kohler, M. J., Billinghurst, M., & Thomas, B. H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2868569 · Cited by 23
Principles For Aiding Complex Military Decision Making
Kelly, R. T., Morrison, J. G., & Hutchins, S. G. (1996) · Cited by 23
High eyewitness confidence is always compelling: that’s a problem
Key, K. N., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., DeLoach, D. K., Wetmore, S. A., McAdoo, R. M., & McCollum, D. L. (2022) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.2007912 · Cited by 22
Principles for Intelligent Decision Aiding
Hutchins, S. G. (1996) · Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1447-9_8 · Cited by 22
Emotions and culpability: How the law is at odds with psychology, jurors, and itself.
Finkel, N. J., & Parrott, W. G. (2006) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11475-000 · Cited by 21
3 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning
Bartels, B. L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0003 · Cited by 22
An examination of the effects of mental disorders as mitigating factors on capital sentencing outcomes
Miley, L. N., Heiss‐Moses, E., Cochran, J. K., Heide, K. M., Fogel, S. J., Smith, M. D., & Bejerregaard, B. J. (2020) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2477 · Cited by 21
Story Credibility in Narrative Arguments
Olmos, P. (2015) · Argumentation library · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21103-9_12 · Cited by 21
The Influence of Witness Intoxication, Witness Race, and Defendant Race on Mock Juror Decision Making
Ewanation, L. A., & Maeder, E. M. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale · doi:10.3138/cjccj.2017-0047.r2 · Cited by 21
Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt
Pearson, J. M., Law, J. R., Skene, J. H. P., Beskind, D. H., Vidmar, N. J., Ball, D. A., Malekpour, A., Carter, R., & Skene, J. H. P. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0451-z · Cited by 21
Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación
Fernández, R. A., Rivera, F. F., & Fraga, A. I. (2000) · Psicothema · Cited by 21
Unpacking the Doubt in “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”: Plausible Alternative Stories Increase Not Guilty Verdicts
Tenney, E. R., Cleary, H. M. D., & Spellman, B. A. (2009) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530802659687 · Cited by 21
Causal judgment from contingency information: A systematic test of thepCI rule
White, P. A. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195830 · Cited by 20
The psychology of consumer fraud
Shadel, D., & Schweitzer-Pak, K. B. (2007) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 21
Lay perspectives on legal conundrums: Impossible and mistaken act cases.
Finkel, N. J., Maloney, S. T., Valbuena, M. Z., & Groscup, J. (1995) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499376 · Cited by 20
A Battle of Visions: Dueling Images of Morality in U.S. Political Campaign TV Ads
Page, J. T., & Duffy, M. E. (2009) · Communication Culture and Critique · doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.01031.x · Cited by 20
Frequency of judgment as a context-like determinant of predictive judgments
Vadillo, M. A., Vegas, S., & Matute, H. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196882 · Cited by 20
The Impact of Acquaintance Rape Stories and Case-Specific Pretrial Publicity on Juror Decision Making
Mullin, C. J., Imrich, D. J., & Linz, D. G. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001004 · Cited by 20
Coherence-based reasoning and order effects in legal judgments.
Engel, C., Timme, S., & Glöckner, A. (2020) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000257 · Cited by 19
Neural substrates of spontaneous narrative production in focal neurodegenerative disease
Gola, K. A., Thorne, A., Veldhuisen, L. D., Felix, C. M., Hankinson, S., Pham, J. Q., Shany‐Ur, T., Schauer, G. F., Stanley, C. M., Glenn, S., et al. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.022 · Cited by 24
Procedural influences on judgments and behavioral decisions
Wyer, R. S. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.12.002 · Cited by 19
How people cope with uncertainty due to chance or deception
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., Burnstein, E., & Yahalom, N. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.015 · Cited by 21
Thought as a determinant of political opinion
Sloman, S. A., & Rabb, N. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.014 · Cited by 21
Selecting futures: The role of conviction, narratives, ambivalence, and constructive doubt
Fenton‐O’Creevy, M., & Tuckett, D. (2021) · Futures & Foresight Science · doi:10.1002/ffo2.111 · Cited by 24
Self-Reported Reasons: A Test and Application of Reasons Theory on Occupational Behavior
Westaby, J. D., Fishbein, M., & Aherin, R. A. (1997) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/15324839751036922 · Cited by 19
Judgement Frequency, Belief Revision, and Serial processing of Causal Information
Catena, A., Maldonado, A., Megías, J. L., & Frese, B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B · doi:10.1080/02724990244000007 · Cited by 19
Explaining the Evidence: How the Mind Investigates the World
Lagnado, D. A. (2021) · Cited by 18
Beyond the features: The role of consistency in impressions of trust
Winkielman, P., & Nowak, A. K. (2022) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9233 · Cited by 19
Caveats in science-based news stories communicate caution without lowering interest.
Bott, L. A., Bratton, L., Diaconu, B., Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Boivin, J., Williams, A., & Sumner, P. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000232 · Cited by 19
Culture, Narrative, and Human Agency
Kashima, Y., Peters, K., & Whelan, J. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373694-9.00017-9 · Cited by 19
Does personality influence reactions to judicial instructions? Some preliminary findings and possible implications.
Shaffer, D. R., & Wheatman, S. R. (2000) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037//1076-8971.6.3.655 · Cited by 18
Explanations determine the impact of information on financial investment judgments
Mulligan, E. J., & Hastie, R. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.491 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors’ perceptions of rape trial testimony
Ryan, N., & Westera, N. J. (2018) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2018.1474815 · Cited by 19
Conspiracy Theory as Individual and Group Behavior: Observations from the Flat Earth International Conference
Fernbach, P. M., & Bogard, J. E. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12662 · Cited by 17
The More the Better? Effects of Training, Experience and Information Amount in Legal Judgments
Dickert, S., Herbig, B., Glöckner, A., Gansen, C., & Portack, R. (2011) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1813 · Cited by 18
The Contemporary American Jury
Diamond, S. S., & Rose, M. R. (2018) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113618 · Cited by 20
Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions
Helm, R. K. (2021) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/13657127211031018 · Cited by 17
2 Multiple Constraint Satisfaction in Judging
Robbennolt, J. K., MacCoun, R. J., & Darley, J. M. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0002 · Cited by 17
The Role of Familiarity with the Defendant, Type of Descriptor Discrepancy, and Eyewitness Age on Mock Jurors’ Perceptions of Eyewitness Testimony
Sheahan, C. L., Pozzulo, J., Reed, J. E., & Pica, E. (2017) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-017-9232-2 · Cited by 17
Evidence coverage and argument skills: cognitive factors in a juror's verdict choice
Weinstock, M. P., & Flaton, R. A. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.470 · Cited by 17
Causal Thinking in Judgments
Hastie, R. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch21 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Explanation, updating, and accuracy
Douven, I. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1230122 · Cited by 16
The prevalence of declarative and indirect yes/no Questions when children testify in criminal cases of child sexual abuse in the United States
Stolzenberg, S. N., Morse, S., Haverkate, D. L., & Garcia-Johnson, A. M. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3607 · Cited by 16
Alternative stories and the decision to prosecute: an applied approach against confirmation bias in criminal prosecution
Schmittat, S. M., Englich, B., Sautner, L., & Velten, P. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1941013 · Cited by 18
Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming arguments in mock jurors' verdict justifications
Weinstock, M. P. (2011) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.575191 · Cited by 17
Thinking about evidence
Streatfield, D., & Markless, S. (2018) · Facet eBooks · doi:10.29085/9781856048941.010 · Cited by 16
Narrative coherence in multiple forensic interviews with child witnesses alleging physical and sexual abuse
Szojka, Z. A., Nicol, A., & Rooy, D. L. L. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3673 · Cited by 15
Memory, History and Narrative: Shifts of Meaning when (Re)constructing the Past
de Luna, I. B., & Rivero, A. R. (2012) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i2.460 · Cited by 16
‘I know how they must feel’: Empathy and judging defendants
Wood, J. L., James, M., & Ciardha, C. Ó. (2014) · The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context · doi:10.5093/ejpalc2014a5 · Cited by 16
10 Judges, Expertise, and Analogy
Spellman, B. A. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0010 · Cited by 15
Constraint Satisfaction Processes in Social Reasoning
Read, S. J., Snow, C. J., & Simon, D. (2003) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 16
What makes recovered-memory testimony compelling to jurors?
Coleman, B. L., Stevens, M. J., & Reeder, G. D. (2001) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1010607401492 · Cited by 16
Judicial Decisionmaking: A Behavioral PerspectivePreprint
Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 16
Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.
Devine, K., & Mojtahedi, D. (2021) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101714 · Cited by 15
Verdict spotting: Investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors
Curley, L. J., Murray, J., MacLean, R., Munro, J., Lages, M., Frumkin, L. A., Laybourn, P., & Brown, D. (2022) · Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2021.1904450 · Cited by 15
Exploring Juror's Listening Processes: The Effect of Listening Style Preference on Juror Decision Making
Worthington, D. L. (2001) · International Journal of Listening · doi:10.1080/10904018.2001.10499043 · Cited by 15
Initial evidence for the assimilation hypothesis
Rassin, E. (2017) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2017.1371307 · Cited by 15
The utility of direct questions in eliciting subjective content from children disclosing sexual abuse
Stolzenberg, S. N., Williams, S., McWilliams, K., Liang, C., & Lyon, T. D. (2019) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.02.014 · Cited by 15
The role of narrative in collaborative reasoning and intelligence analysis: A case study
Saletta, M., Kruger, A., Primoratz, T., Barnett, A., van Gelder, T., & Horn, R. E. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226981 · Cited by 15
Argument from analogy in legal rhetoric
Walton, D. (2013) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-013-9139-x · Cited by 15
Attorney Questions Predict Jury‐eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt
Mugno, A. P., Klemfuss, J. Z., & Lyon, T. D. (2016) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2214 · Cited by 15
Comparing holistic and atomistic evaluation of evidence
Schweizer, M. (2013) · Law Probability and Risk · doi:10.1093/lpr/mgt013 · Cited by 15
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability.
Finkel, N. J., & Groscup, J. (1997) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.3.1.65 · Cited by 15
Polygraph Testimony and Juror Judgments: A Comparison of the Guilty Knowledge Test and the Control Question Test1
Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01606.x · Cited by 15
Legal Epistemology
Gardiner, G. (2019) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0390 · Cited by 15
Can there be a burden of the best explanation?
Ribeiro, G. S. D. A. (2018) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/1365712718765539 · Cited by 14
Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial-ordered notebook
Hope, L., Eales, N., & Mirashi, A. (2014) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12003 · Cited by 15
A re-examination of the 1966 Kalven-Zeisel study of judge-jury agreements and disagreements and their causes
Gastwirth, J. L. (2004) · Law Probability and Risk · doi:10.1093/lawprj/3.3-4.169 · Cited by 14
Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication
Urbaniak, R. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-018-9219-z · Cited by 14
Toward a cognitive science of markets: economic agents as sense-makers
Johnson, S. G. B. (2019) · Economics · doi:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2019-49 · Cited by 12
Functions and Cognitive Bases for the Concept of Actual Causation
Danks, D. J. (2013) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-013-9439-2 · Cited by 16
The conceptual centrality of causal cycles
Kim, N. S., Luhmann, C. C., Pierce, M. L., & Ryan, M. M. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.6.744 · Cited by 14
The Effects of Offshoring Audit Tasks on Jurors’ Evaluations of Damage Awards Against Auditors
Daugherty, B. E., Dickins, D. E., & Fennema, M. G. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1475-1488(2013)0000016008 · Cited by 14
Using story‐based causal diagrams to analyze disagreements about complex events
Shapiro, B. P., van den Broek, P., & Fletcher, C. R. (1995) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539509544931 · Cited by 14
Statistical evidence and the problem of robust litigation
Bull, J., & Watson, J. (2019) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12302 · Cited by 13
Appraisals and Reappraisals in the Courtroom
Ellsworth, P. C., & Dougherty, A. (2015) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073915601227 · Cited by 13
Immersive Visualisation of Geo-Temporal Narratives in Law Enforcement
Cunningham, A., Walsh, J. A., & Thomas, B. H. (2018) · Big Data Visual and Immersive Analytics · doi:10.1109/bdva.2018.8533896 · Cited by 13
Root Cause Analysis and Its Effect on Auditors' Judgments and Decisions in an Integrated Audit*
DeZoort, F. T., Doxey, M. M., & Pollard, T. (2020) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12649 · Cited by 13
The impact of schemas on decision-making in cases involving allegations of sexual violence
McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B., Nitschke, F., Lee, H. D. H., & Schuller, R. A. (2020) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2020.1829780 · Cited by 13

Authors: Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1992-02
Volume: 62
Issue: 2
Pages: 189-206
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
OpenAlex: W1984737313
Cited by: 761
References: 51
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI: 103.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: story model, jury decision-making, narrative construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks