Cited by 763Jury Decision Making ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudenceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Pennington, Nancy, Hastie, Reid·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories could be constructed affected verdict judgments and the impact of credibility evidence. Memory for evidence in all conditions was equivalent, implying that the story structure was a mediator of decisions and of the impact of credibility evidence. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss evaluated the evidence in 3 ways. When Ss made a global judgment at the end of the case, their judgment processes followed the prescriptions of the Story Model, not of Bayesian or linear updating models. When Ss made item-by-item judgments after each evidence block, linear anchor and adjust models described their judgments. In conditions in which story construction strategies were more likely to be used, story completeness had greater effects on decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“Causal calculi in the form of algebraic computations (e.g., Anderson, 1974; Einhorn & Hogarth, 1985) or inductive rules (e.g., Kelley, 1973 ) describe how stimulus information is translated into explanations, predictions, and assignments of responsibility.”
Background
Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
Miller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,646
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400871957 · Cited by 1,508

Show all 51 references

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 763

Bridging the gap between Bayesian and story-comparison models of juridical inference
Spottswood, E. (2013) · Law Probability and Risk · doi:10.1093/lpr/mgt010 · Cited by 16
The role of defendant gender on juror decision-making within a mock sex trafficking case among a jury-eligible community sample
Stevens, K. L., Austin, A., Wheeler, D., & Malec, T. (2021) · Journal of Sexual Aggression · doi:10.1080/13552600.2021.1973127 · Cited by 13
Promoting child and family wellness: priorities for psychological and social interventions
Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. B. (2000) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1298(200003/04)10:2 · Cited by 100
Reeder's MIM as a Special Case of Confluence Theory
Trafimow, D. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400902744311 · Cited by 13
The Effect of Expanded Audit Report Disclosures on Users’ Confidence in the Audit and the Financial Statements
Kipp, P. C. (2017) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 13
How Length of and Reason for Delayed Reporting Influence Mock-Jurors’ Judgments in a Sexual Assault Trial
Thompson, L. E., & Pozzulo, J. (2024) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-024-09664-z · Cited by 12
The attribution of responsibility in cases of stalking
Scott, A. J., Gavin, J., sleath, E., & Sheridan, L. P. (2013) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.854793 · Cited by 12
The Perception of a Jailhouse Informant in a Sexual Assault Case
Golding, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., Bornstein, B. H., Pals, A. M., & Wetmore, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-020-09400-3 · Cited by 12
Handle with care: Jury deliberation and demeanour-based assessments of witness credibility
Chalmers, J., Leverick, F., & Munro, V. E. (2022) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/13657127221120955 · Cited by 12
From Mind to Context, from Accuracy to Meaning. Exploring the Grammar of Remembering as a Socially Situated Act
de Luna, I. B. (2016) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-016-9345-7 · Cited by 12
Representing and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian Network
Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Bart Verheij, A. (2013) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/oasics.cmn.2013.315 · Cited by 12
Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial
Tait, D. S. (2011) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865811419067 · Cited by 12
Tell me a story: Crafting and publishing research in consumer psychology
Peracchio, L. A., & Escalas, J. E. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.008 · Cited by 12
To Decide or not to Decide: Decision Making and Decision Avoidance in Critical Incidents
Eyre, M., & Alison, L. J. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470713068.ch13 · Cited by 12
Narrative Decision-Making in Investment Choices: How Investors Use News About Company PerformancePreprint
Johnson, S. G. B., & Tuckett, D. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3037463 · Cited by 14
Consumer Decision-Making: An Empirical Exploration of Multi-Phased Decision Processes
Shao, W. (2007) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/3685 · Cited by 12
Customer encounter satisfaction and narrative force: an investigation of user-generated content on TripAdvisor
Cassar, M. L., Konietzny, J., & Caruana, A. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism · doi:10.1080/15022250.2023.2194272 · Cited by 11
Subjective consistency increases trust
Nowak, A. K., Biesaga, M., Ziembowicz, K., Baran, T., & Winkielman, P. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32034-4 · Cited by 13
Narrative criminal justice
Barrera, D. J. (2019) · International journal of law, crime and justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.06.004 · Cited by 23
“Did You Ever Fight Back?” Jurors’ Questions to Children Testifying in Criminal Trials About Alleged Sexual Abuse
George, S. S., Garcia-Johnson, A. M., Denne, E., & Stolzenberg, S. N. (2020) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854820935960 · Cited by 11
9 In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging
Simon, D. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0009 · Cited by 11
History and International Relations
Thagard, P. R. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190678722.003.0009 · Cited by 11
The reasonable doubt standard as inference to the best explanation
Jellema, H. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02743-8 · Cited by 11
Prediction and Explanation in a Postmodern World
Krueger, J. I. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597706 · Cited by 9
Expert-Novice Differences in the Understanding and Explanation of Complex Political Conflicts
Jones, D. K., & Read, S. J. (2004) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3901_2 · Cited by 11
Criminal investigation : motivation, emotion and cognition in the processing of evidence
Ask, K. (2006) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 11
The Impact of a Judgment Rule and Critical Audit Matters on Assessments of Auditor Legal Liability – The Moderating Role of Legal KnowledgePreprint
Brown, T., Majors, T. M., & Peecher, M. E. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 11
Decision Making, Psychology of
van der Pligt, J. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01750-2 · Cited by 25
Art or Confession?: Evaluating Rap Lyrics as Evidence in Criminal Cases
Dunbar, A. (2018) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/2153368717749879 · Cited by 14
Are Humans Intuitive Philosophers?
Sloman, S. A., Zemla, J. C., Lagnado, D. A., Bechlivanidis, C., & Hemmatian, B. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190860974.003.0012 · Cited by 11
The curious case of the jury-shaped hole: A plea for real jury research
Ross, L. D. (2023) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/13657127221150451 · Cited by 10
Updating as Part of Everyday Work: An Interactional Perspective.
Christianson, M. K. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 10
Decision Making, Psychology of
van der Pligt, J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.24014-2 · Cited by 14
Decision Making
Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471214426.pas0210 · Cited by 10
Reflections on the type of question as a determinant of the form of interaction in decision‐making and problem‐solving discussions
Gouran, D. S. (2003) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370309370146 · Cited by 9
Solving the puzzle: The effects of contextual information and feedback on the interpretation of a crime scene
van den Eeden, C. A. J., Ost, J., de Poot, C. J., & Koppen, P. J. V. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.1494 · Cited by 9
Battered Women Who Kill: Impact of Expert Testimony Type and Timing
Terrance, C. A., Plumm, K. M., & Kehn, A. (2013) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.773846 · Cited by 9
Story Appraisal Theory: From Story Kernel Appraisals to Implications and Impact
Berger, C. R., Ha, Y., & Chen, M. (2016) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650216641186 · Cited by 9
The construction of allegedly abused children’s narratives in Scottish criminal courts
Prince, E. R., Andrews, S. J., Lamb, M. E., & Foster, J. (2017) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2017.1399395 · Cited by 9
Legal proof and statistical conjunctions
Ross, L. D. (2020) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01521-z · Cited by 9
Memory and judgment: Availability versus explanation-based accounts
Wolfe, M. B. W., & Pennington, N. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201252 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
The Effect on Mock-Juror Decision-Making of Power-of-Speech Within Eyewitness Testimony and Types of Scientific Evidence
Clancy, D., & Bull, R. (2014) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2014.960029 · Cited by 9
Causal Knowledge and Reasoning in Decision Making
Hagmayer, Y., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2017) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.004 · Cited by 9
Community-Oriented Policing and Technological Innovations
Leventakis, G., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in criminology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89294-8 · Cited by 9
Police and Prosecutors’ Perceptions of Adult Sexual Assault Evidence Associated with Case Authorisation and Conviction
Darwinkel, E., Powell, M. B., & Sharman, S. J. (2015) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-015-9162-9 · Cited by 9
Psychology and Disaster: Why We Do Not See Looming Disasters and How Our Way of Thinking Causes Them
Glöckner, A. (2016) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12289 · Cited by 8
Effects of the “intimate conviction” instruction on the processing of judicial information
Esnard, C., Dumas, R., & Bordel, S. (2013) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2012.12.002 · Cited by 8
The Effect of Type of Internal Control Report on Users’ Confidence in the Accompanying Financial Statement Audit Report*
Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2011) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01080.x · Cited by 9
Inferences from disclosures about the truth and falsity of expert testimony
Moreno‐Ríos, S., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1378724 · Cited by 8
Enhancing human-machine teaming for medical prognosis through neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs)
Fompeyrine, D. A., Vorm, E. S., Ricka, N., Rose, F., & Pellegrin, G. (2021) · Human-Intelligent Systems Integration · doi:10.1007/s42454-021-00037-z · Cited by 8
Using narratives and numbers in performance prediction: Attitudes, confidence, and validity
Niessen, A. S. M., Kausel, E. E., & Neumann, M. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12364 · Cited by 10
Judgement heuristics and bias in evidence interpretation: The effects of computer generated exhibits
Norris, G. (2015) · International Journal of Law and Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.016 · Cited by 8
Effectiveness of multimedia presentations in improving understanding of technical terminologies and concepts: a pilot study
Cahyani, N. D. W., Martini, B., & Choo, K. R. (2016) · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1080/00450618.2015.1128968 · Cited by 8
Tomada de decisão de psicólogos em situações de suspeita de abuso sexual
Pelisoli, C., & Dell’Aglio, D. D. (2016) · Temas em Psicologia · doi:10.9788/tp2016.3-04 · Cited by 8
The case for relative plausibility theory: Promising, but insufficient
Hastie, R. (2019) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/1365712718816749 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Storytelling Rituals in Jury Deliberations
Rossner, M. (2019) · Oñati Socio-legal Series · doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1038 · Cited by 8
Linking Content to Process: How Mental Models of the Customer Enhance the Creative Strategy Processes
Rughase, O. G. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220443.n3 · Cited by 7
Cognitive Biases in Human Causal Learning
Maldonado, A., Catena, A., Perales, J. C., & Cândido, A. (2007) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1138741600006508 · Cited by 8
When stories and numbers meet in court: Constructing and Explaining Bayesian Networks for Criminal Cases with Scenarios
Vlek, C. S. (2016) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 8
Do Pre-Trial Juror Attitudes Predict Rape Trial Verdict Decisions? Investigating the Role of Rape Myth Beliefs, Contemporary Sexist Attitudes and Sexual Victimization Experiences on Juror Decision-Making
Headd, S., & Willmott, D. (2025) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaf099 · Cited by 8
Narratives and Valuations
Morag, D., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.01076 · Cited by 9
Naturalistic decision making through argumentation: Resolving labour disputes
Ramiah, S. P., & Banks, A. P. (2015) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12103 · Cited by 7
Homicide Event Motive: A Situational Perspective
Parker, B. L., & McKinley, A. C. (2018) · Salus journal · Cited by 7
Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts
Shengelia, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.519262 · Cited by 7
Defining and developing data literacy
Kuhn, D. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.18015.1 · Cited by 6
Effectiveness of Question Trails as Jury Decision Aids: the Jury's Still Out
McKay, C., Nolan, M., & Smithson, M. J. (2013) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.839929 · Cited by 7
Reflections on collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning
Lin, T., & Anderson, R. C. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.002 · Cited by 7
Press articles and influence processes: the different effects of incriminating information and crime story information on judgments of guilt
Dumas, R., Lepastourel, N., & Testé, B. (2013) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.854790 · Cited by 7
Preface to “When Does Sample Matter in Juror Decision‐Making Research? Differences Between College Student and Representative Samples of Jurors”
Lieberman, J. D., Krauss, D. A., & Wiener, R. L. (2011) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.987 · Cited by 7
Probabilistic Evidence Versus the Representation of an Event: The Curious Case of Mrs. Prob's Dog
Sykes, D. L., & Johnson, J. T. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/15324839951036371 · Cited by 7
Expert Decision Making in a Complex Engineering Environment
Cropp, N., Banks, A. P., & Elghali, L. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343411415795 · Cited by 7
Guided by the rape schema: the influence of event order on how jurors evaluate the victim’s testimony in cases of rape
Lee, H. D. H., McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B., & Tangen, J. M. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1984483 · Cited by 7
Argumentation and Evidence
Bex, F. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0014 · Cited by 7
An empirical evaluation of topic map search capabilities in an educational context
Shaw, S., Dicks, D., Venkatesh, V., Lowerison, G., & Zhang, D. (2004) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet.2004.1358242 · Cited by 7
Narrative monologue as a first step towards advanced mission debrief for AUV operator situational awareness
Johnson, N., & Lane, D. M. (2011) · International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR) · doi:10.1109/icar.2011.6088618 · Cited by 7
13 Searching for Constraint in Legal Decision Making
Braman, E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0013 · Cited by 8
What causes top management teams to make poor strategic decisions
Stephenson, C. B. (2012) · Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) · Cited by 7
The Impact of a Higher Intent Standard on Auditors' Legal Exposure and the Moderating Role of Jurors' Legal KnowledgePreprint
Brown, T., Majors, T. M., & Peecher, M. E. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7
Examining the Persistence of Central and Peripherical Information in Honest Witness
Montes, Á., Sanmarco, J., Cea, B., Marcos, V., & Seijo, D. (2024) · Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud · doi:10.23923/j.rips.2024.02.079 · Cited by 6
The Influence of Assault Type, Delayed Reporting, and Testimony Inconsistencies on Mock Jurors’ Judgments
Pica, E., Bride, H., Lamirande, A., & Pozzulo, J. (2024) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-024-09717-3 · Cited by 6
Female Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Homicide: Stereotyping and Factors. A Systematic Review of Twenty Years of Literature, 2003–2023
Crosland, S., Tzani, C., & Ιωάννου, Μ. (2025) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2025.2501618 · Cited by 6
Statistical Issues in Serial Killer Nurse Cases
Gill, R. D., Fenton, N., & Lagnado, D. A. (2022) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws11050065 · Cited by 6
Minds and markets as complex systems: an emerging approach to cognitive economics
Johnson, S. G. B., Schotanus, P., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.07.003 · Cited by 10
Timing and Type of Pretrial Publicity Affect Mock-Jurors’ Decisions and Predecisional Distortion
Ruva, C. L., Mayes, J. L., Dickman, M. C., & McEvoy, C. L. (2012) · International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120204.06 · Cited by 6
How Analysts Think: How Do Criminal Intelligence Analysts Recognise and Manage Significant Information?
Groenewald, C., Wong, B. L. W., Attfield, S., Passmore, P., & Kodagoda, N. (2017) · European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference · doi:10.1109/eisic.2017.15 · Cited by 6
The Scenario Theory about Evidence in Criminal Law
Mackor, A., & Koppen, P. J. V. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859307.003.0016 · Cited by 6
17 Cognitive Style and Judging
Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0017 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Challenges of Implementing Guidelines for the Design of Visual Analytics Systems
Haider, J. D., Pohl, M., Hillemann, E.-C., Nussbaumer, A., Attfield, S., Passmore, P., & Wong, B. L. W. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591053 · Cited by 6
Incidental Prices and Their Effect on Consumer Willingness to Pay
Nunes, J. C., & Boatwright, P. (2002) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 6
Disentangling the Evidence: Mock Jurors, Inadmissible Testimony and Integrative Encoding
Mallard, D., & Perkins, D. P. (2005) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1375/pplt.12.2.289 · Cited by 6
Validation of the factor structure and predictive validity of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale for robbery and sexual assault trial scenarios
Smith, L. L., & Bull, R. (2013) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2013.793340 · Cited by 6
“Now you are getting into the law”: The mediation of specialised language in a jury trial
Anesa, P. (2017) · Fachsprache · doi:10.24989/fs.v31i1-2.1426 · Cited by 6
Unfolding Crime Scenarios with Variations: A Method for Building a Bayesian Network for Legal Narratives
Vlek, C. S., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Bart Verheij, A. (2013) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-145 · Cited by 6
Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation
Curley, L. J., Murray, J., MacLean, R., & Laybourn, P. (2017) · Medicine Science and the Law · doi:10.1177/0025802417733354 · Cited by 6
Jury-Trial Story Construction and Analysis Using Goal-Directed Answer Set Programming
Xu, Z., Arias, J., Salazar, E., Chen, Z., Varanasi, S. C., Basu, K., & Gupta, G. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24841-2_17 · Cited by 6
How analysts think: A preliminary study of human needs and demands for AI-based conversational agents
Hepenstal, S., Wong, B. L. W., Zhang, L., & Kodogoda, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181319631333 · Cited by 6
Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
White, P. A. (2005) · PubMed · doi:10.1080/02724990444000078 · Cited by 6
Process Narratives, Grey Boxes, and Discourse Frameworks
Saferstein, B. (2007) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/1368431007080704 · Cited by 6
8 Features of Judicial Reasoning
Sherwin, E. L. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0008 · Cited by 6
Neurorecht ohne Psychologie?: die Rolle verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Betrachtungsebenen bei der Ableitung rechtspolitischer Empfehlungen
Glöckner, A. (2008) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 6

Authors: Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.
Affiliations: University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1992-02
Volume: 62
Issue: 2
Pages: 189-206
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
OpenAlex: W1984737313
Cited by: 761
References: 51
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI: 103.75
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: story model, jury decision-making, narrative construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks