The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.
Abstract
This research investigates the Story Model, Pennington and Hastie's (1986, 1988) explanationbased theory of decision making for juror decisions. In Experiment 1, varying the ease with which stories could be constructed affected verdict judgments and the impact of credibility evidence. Memory for evidence in all conditions was equivalent, implying that the story structure was a mediator of decisions and of the impact of credibility evidence. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss evaluated the evidence in 3 ways. When Ss made a global judgment at the end of the case, their judgment processes followed the prescriptions of the Story Model, not of Bayesian or linear updating models. When Ss made item-by-item judgments after each evidence block, linear anchor and adjust models described their judgments. In conditions in which story construction strategies were more likely to be used, story completeness had greater effects on decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The story model of jury decision-making (Pennington and Hastie 1992), underpinned by a wealth of empirical support (Pennington and Hastie 1988;Willmott et al. 2018), suggests that jurors are actively engaged in a narrative construction of information surrounding a case.”
From Do Pre-Trial Juror Attitudes Predict Rape Trial Verdict Decisions? Investigating the Role of Rape Myth Beliefs, Contemporary Sexist Attitudes and Sexual Victimization Experiences on Juror Decision-Making (2025) · cites this paper as Pennington and Hastie 1992
In the citing paper
“Taken together, findings offer theoretical support for Pennington and Hastie's (1992) story model of juror decision-making”
From Do Pre-Trial Juror Attitudes Predict Rape Trial Verdict Decisions? Investigating the Role of Rape Myth Beliefs, Contemporary Sexist Attitudes and Sexual Victimization Experiences on Juror Decision-Making (2025) · cites this paper as Pennington and Hastie's (1992)
In the citing paper
“For this reason, the policymaking process and the jury-based law system are often characterized not only by debates over facts but also by the narrative interpretations of those facts (Mukand & Rodrik, 2018; Pennington & Hastie, 1992).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Pennington & Hastie, 1992
Citations
Cites
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.
Kintsch, W. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163 · Cited by 4,618
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“Causal calculi in the form of algebraic computations (e.g., Anderson, 1974; Einhorn & Hogarth, 1985) or inductive rules (e.g., Kelley, 1973 ) describe how stimulus information is translated into explanations, predictions, and assignments of responsibility.”
BackgroundMiller, G. A., & Cantor, N. E. (1982) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1982.1.1.83 · Cited by 2,862
Attribution theory and research
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325 · Cited by 2,651
The Representation of Meaning in Memory
Anderson, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421786 · Cited by 2,061
New directions in attribution research
Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., & Kidd, R. F. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,994
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,646
Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites
(2015) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400871957 · Cited by 1,508
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612451018 · Cited by 2,920
Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation
Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309341564 · Cited by 1,821
Shafir, E. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-s · Cited by 1,453
Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands
Escalas, J. E. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19 · Cited by 1,398
Culpable control and the psychology of blame.
Alicke, M. D. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.556 · Cited by 1,062
Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior
Westaby, J. D. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003 · Cited by 823
The neuropsychology of narrative: story comprehension, story production and their interrelation
Mar, R. A. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.016 · Cited by 579
How Stories Make Sense of Personal Experiences: Motives that Shape Autobiographical Narratives
Baumeister, R. F., & Newman, L. S. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294206006 · Cited by 474
The Role of Narratives in Consumer Information Processing
Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_01 · Cited by 470
Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference.
Ames, D. R. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340 · Cited by 447
Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351441 · Cited by 449
Simplicity and probability in causal explanation.
Lombrozo, T. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.006 · Cited by 430
Kuhn, D. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00302 · Cited by 388
Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.684 · Cited by 415
Why Most People Disapprove of Me: Experience Sampling in Impression Formation.
Denrell, J. C. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.951 · Cited by 352
Making Sense of Issues Through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis
Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00451.x · Cited by 332
A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory
Reyna, V. F. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002291 · Cited by 333
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., & Cooke, A. D. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.447 · Cited by 332
The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction.
Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.814 · Cited by 306
INDUCTIVE TOP-DOWN THEORIZING: A SOURCE OF NEW THEORIES OF ORGANIZATION.
Shepherd, D. A., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0157 · Cited by 317
Reasoning in explanation-based decision making
Pennington, N. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-w · Cited by 293
Self-citationRead, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_3 · Cited by 286
The under-appreciated drive for sense-making
Chater, N., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.10.016 · Cited by 281
Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.296 · Cited by 257
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments.
Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000006 · Cited by 245
White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom.
Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201 · Cited by 247
Explanation and abductive inference
Lombrozo, T. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0014 · Cited by 242
Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure
Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005) · Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling · doi:10.1002/jip.19 · Cited by 231
Explanatory Preferences Shape Learning and Inference
Lombrozo, T. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.001 · Cited by 229
Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools
Freitas, J. D., Agarwal, S., Schmitt, B. H., & Haslam, N. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2 · Cited by 271
Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors.
Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.2.91 · Cited by 225
A Deeper Understanding of Sequence in Narrative Visualization
Hullman, J. R., Drucker, S. M., Riche, N. H., Lee, B., Fisher, D., & Adar, E. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.119 · Cited by 224
Making the Truth Stick & the Myths Fade: Lessons from Cognitive Psychology
Schwarz, N., Newman, E., & Leach, W. (2016) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2016.0009 · Cited by 203
Explanation and Evidence in Informal Argument
Brem, S. K., & Rips, L. J. (2000) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2 · Cited by 202
Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction
Simon, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0604_03 · Cited by 200
The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making.
Simon, D., Pham, L. B., Le, Q. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1250 · Cited by 199
Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015135 · Cited by 210
A General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks
Fenton, N., Neil, M., & Lagnado, D. A. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12004 · Cited by 200
The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review.
Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1022325019080 · Cited by 180
Steblay, N. K., Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., & McWethy, A. (2006) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7 · Cited by 191
How storytelling shapes memory and impressions of relationship events over time.
McGregor, I., & Holmes, J. G. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.403 · Cited by 181
Fishing For Feelings? Hooking Viewers Helps!
Escalas, J. E., Moore, M. C., & Edell, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_12 · Cited by 181
The Structure of Discussions that Promote Reasoning
Chinn, C. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1998) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146819810000205 · Cited by 166
Mindreading: Judgments About Intentionality and Motives in Dispositional Inference
Reeder, G. D. (2009) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/10478400802615744 · Cited by 170
Costa, D. F., Carvalho, F. D. M., Moreira, B. C. D. M., & do Prado, J. W. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2371-5 · Cited by 191
How fuzzy-trace theory predicts true and false memories for words, sentences, and narratives.
Reyna, V. F., Corbin, J. C., Weldon, R. B., & Brainerd, C. J. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.12.003 · Cited by 186
The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
Marco, M., Gracia, E., Tomás, J. M., & López‐Quílez, A. (2016) · Cited by 162
Dinos, S., Burrowes, N., Hammond, K., & Cunliffe, C. (2015) · International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice · doi:10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001 · Cited by 152
Porter, S., & ten Brinke, L. (2008) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532508x281520 · Cited by 169
Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.267 · Cited by 157
Why wasn't O.J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference
Thagard, P. R. (2003) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/0269993024400002 · Cited by 147
CAUSAL INFERENCE IN LEGAL DECISION MAKING: EXPLANATORY COHERENCE VS. BAYESIAN NETWORKS
Thagard, P. R. (2004) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839510490279861 · Cited by 149
Hammond, E. M., Berry, M. A., & Rodriguez, D. N. (2011) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532510x499887 · Cited by 145
On the Usefulness of Narratives: An Interdisciplinary Review and Theoretical Model
Shaffer, V. A., Focella, E. S., Hathaway, A., Scherer, L. D., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kax008 · Cited by 129
Conviction Narrative Theory: A theory of choice under radical uncertainty
Johnson, S. G. B., Bilovich, A., & Tuckett, D. (2023) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x22001157 · Cited by 131
Masser, B., Lee, K., & McKimmie, B. M. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9648-y · Cited by 149
The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection.
Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B., & Spencer, S. J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.283 · Cited by 129
What Do We Know About Rape Myths and Juror Decision Making?’,
Leverick, F. (2020) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/1365712720923157 · Cited by 127
Ahn, W., & Bailenson, J. N. (1996) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0013 · Cited by 124
Schwartzstein, J., & Sunderam, A. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191074 · Cited by 121
Kinder, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x · Cited by 120
Goldstein, W. M., & Weber, E. U. (1995) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60308-4 · Cited by 119
Mandel, D. R. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419 · Cited by 119
The Instrumental Value of Explanations
Lombrozo, T. (2011) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00413.x · Cited by 118
Motivational Bias in Criminal Investigators' Judgments of Witness Reliability1
Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00175.x · Cited by 118
Horstmann, N. D., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001182 · Cited by 177
McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260513518843 · Cited by 113
The influence of the components of storytelling blogs on readers’ travel intentions
Hsiao, K., Lu, H., & Lan, W. (2013) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241311313303 · Cited by 112
Chong, K., & Tuckett, D. (2014) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwu020 · Cited by 123
Building self-brand connections: Exploring brand stories through a transmedia perspective
Granitz, N. A., & Forman, H. P. (2015) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2015.1 · Cited by 107
Jury Decision Making: Implications For and From Psychology
Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721410397282 · Cited by 106
Explanation and prior knowledge interact to guide learning
Williams, J. J., & Lombrozo, T. (2012) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.002 · Cited by 105
Content Effects on Decision Making
Rettinger, D. A., & Hastie, R. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2948 · Cited by 108
Self-citationHorstmann, N. D., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 108
Kassin, S. M., & Sommers, S. R. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672972310005 · Cited by 103
The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better
Usher, M., Russo, Z., Weyers, M., Brauner, R., & Zakay, D. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00037 · Cited by 112
Describing jurors' personal conceptions of insanity and their relationship to case judgments.
Skeem, J. L., & Golding, S. L. (2001) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.561 · Cited by 109
Chen, S., & Andersen, S. M. (1999) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60273-7 · Cited by 99
Narratives About the Macroeconomy
Andre, P., Haaland, I., Roth, C., & Wohlfart, J. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4506321 · Cited by 100
Ames, D. R., Weber, E. U., & Zou, X. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.007 · Cited by 101
Coherence Shifts in Probabilistic Inference Tasks
Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.668 · Cited by 115
Rapist or "Regular Guy": Explanatory Coherence in the Construction of Mental Models of Others
Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195005 · Cited by 93
It’s in your nature: a pluralistic folk psychology
Andrews, K. (2007) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9230-5 · Cited by 90
Inference to the Best Explanation versus Bayes’s Rule in a Social Setting
Douven, I., & Wenmackers, S. (2015) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axv025 · Cited by 88
Storytelling by the sales force and its effect on buyer–seller exchange
Gilliam, D. A., & Flaherty, K. E. (2015) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.01.013 · Cited by 89
When negative evidence increases confidence: change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute
McKenzie, C. R. M., Lee, S. M., & Chen, K. K. (2002) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.400 · Cited by 87
Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them
Daftary‐Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, S. (2009) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1348/135532509x465624 · Cited by 84
The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory.
Leippe, M. R. (1995) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.909 · Cited by 84
Horstmann, N. D., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1393729 · Cited by 84
Read, S. J., Miller, L. C., Appleby, P. R., Nwosu, M. E., Reynaldo, S., Lauren, A., & Putcha-Bhagavatula, A. (2006) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00001.x · Cited by 83
Glöckner, A. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004812 · Cited by 85
The effect of frequency of judgement and the type of trials on covariation learning.
Catena, A., Maldonado, A., & Cândido, A. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.481 · Cited by 80
Legal idioms: a framework for evidential reasoning
Lagnado, D. A., Fenton, N., & Neil, M. (2012) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.1080/19462166.2012.682656 · Cited by 80
Turning Mirrors Into Windows?: Assessing the Impact of (Mock) Juror Education in Rape Trials
Ellison, L. E., & Munro, V. E. (2009) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azp013 · Cited by 80
Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x · Cited by 105
Wittenbrink, B., Gist, P. L., & Hilton, J. L. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.526 · Cited by 79
The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making
(2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.001.0001 · Cited by 87
The Effect of Social Networks on the Quality of Political Thinking
Erişen, E., & Erişen, C. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00906.x · Cited by 56
Short brand stories on packaging: An examination of consumer responses
Solja, E., Liljander, V., & Söderlund, M. (2018) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21087 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-206
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1984737313
- Cited by
- 761
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 103.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- story model, jury decision-making, narrative construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
