The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups.
Abstract
The effects of task importance and group decision training on the discussion behavior of decision-making groups were investigated. Three-person groups decided which of 3 hypothetical faculty candidates would be the best person to teach an introductory psychology course. Prior to discussion, some of the information about each candidate was given to all group members (shared information), whereas the remainder was randomly divided among them (unshared information). In general, groups discussed much more of their shared information than their unshared information. Increasing the importance of the task slowed the rate at which information was brought forth during discussion
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Again, the pre-deliberation and pre-discussion distribution of decision-relevant information has a strong influence on the content of intragroup and group attitudes, and this significantly affects individual as well as collective reasoning.”
From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Larson et al., 1994
In the citing paper
“There is a strong tendency, especially in smaller face-to-face discussion groups, to focus on already shared or commonly known and available information, while not taking into account unshared, though maybe highly relevant, information.”
From Collaborative Irrationality, Akrasia, and Groupthink: Social Disruptions of Emotion Regulation (2017) · cites this paper as Larson et al., 1994
Citations
Cites
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
(1978) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(78)90042-3 · Cited by 3,956
Foundations of Information Integration Theory
Carroll, J. S., & Anderson, N. H. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422202 · Cited by 2,105
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467 · Cited by 1,850
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60248-8 · Cited by 1,346
Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods
Klein, G. A. (1993) · Cited by 1,345
Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior
Shaw, M. E. (1971) · Cited by 1,337
External Search Effort: An Investigation Across Several Product Categories
Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209095 · Cited by 1,297
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1985) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.4.395 · Cited by 830
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428
Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,399
Group Performance and Decision Making
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009 · Cited by 1,332
Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013773 · Cited by 1,273
Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012633 · Cited by 932
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.86 · Cited by 883
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307304092 · Cited by 754
Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective
Reiter‐Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005 · Cited by 683
Quality of decision making and group norms.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.6.918 · Cited by 485
Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351441 · Cited by 449
Kahai, S. S., & Cooper, R. B. (2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045754 · Cited by 436
Hidden Profiles: A Brief History
Stasser, G. L., & Titus, W. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2003.9682897 · Cited by 434
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., & Botero, I. C. (2004) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/0363452042000299894 · Cited by 433
THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Mendelberg, T. (2009) · Cited by 421
Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.
Schulz‐Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1080 · Cited by 416
Wilson, M. A., & Howarth, R. B. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00092-7 · Cited by 409
Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory.
Hollingshead, A. B. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080 · Cited by 381
Brand awareness in business markets: When is it related to firm performance?
Homburg, C., Klarmann, M., & Schmitt, J. (2010) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.03.004 · Cited by 405
Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.
Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, G. L. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.619 · Cited by 356
Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.967 · Cited by 296
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Process
(2002) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9781405106535.2002.x · Cited by 296
Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2890 · Cited by 275
A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams
Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00021-3 · Cited by 279
Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322 · Cited by 268
Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052 · Cited by 364
Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.296 · Cited by 257
Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making.
Winquist, J. R., & Jr. Larson James, R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371 · Cited by 246
Twenty-Five Years of Hidden Profiles in Group Decision Making
Lu, L., Yu, Y., & McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311417243 · Cited by 265
‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups
Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002002 · Cited by 225
So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making
Baron, R. S. (2005) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37004-3 · Cited by 212
Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00534-4 · Cited by 200
Levin, S., & van Laar, C. (2006) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410617057 · Cited by 207
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.74 · Cited by 192
When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Phillips, K. W. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271186 · Cited by 202
Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure
Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299259002 · Cited by 189
Making better decisions in groups
Bang, D., & Frith, C. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170193 · Cited by 210
Analogical Learning in Negotiation Teams: Comparing Cases Promotes Learning and Transfer
Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (2003) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2003.9901663 · Cited by 182
The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge
Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., & O’Neill, H. M. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1944 · Cited by 185
Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups
Larson, J. R., Foster‐Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298245004 · Cited by 177
Self-citationSawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006 · Cited by 175
Training People to Work in Groups
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_3 · Cited by 177
Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209333176 · Cited by 153
How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case Study
Piorkowski, D., Park, S., Wang, A. Y., Wang, D., Muller, M., & Portnoy, F. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449205 · Cited by 151
van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003 · Cited by 150
Hogg, M. A. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002031 · Cited by 138
Helping Teams to Help Themselves: Comparing two Team‐Led Debriefing Methods
Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12041 · Cited by 136
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.005 · Cited by 125
Blum, R. H., Raemer, D. B., Carroll, J. S., Dufresne, R. L., & Cooper, J. B. (2005) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000148058.64834.80 · Cited by 123
THE REAPPROPRIATION OF STIGMATIZING LABELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL IDENTITY
Galinsky, A. D., Hugenberg, K., Groom, C. J., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(02)05009-0 · Cited by 123
Crisis Management & Team Effectiveness: A Closer Examination
King, G. (2002) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1021200514323 · Cited by 118
Devine, D. J. (1999) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649649903000506 · Cited by 117
Social Network Ties, Transactive Memory, and Performance in Groups
Lee, J. Y., Bachrach, D. G., & Lewis, K. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0884 · Cited by 112
The Psychoeconomic View of Creative Work in Groups and Organizations
Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1995) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.1995.tb00228.x · Cited by 112
Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups
Wittenbaum, G. M. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498291003 · Cited by 112
Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams.
Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315 · Cited by 341
Self-citationSchittekatte, M., & Hiel, A. V. (1996) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496496273006 · Cited by 99
Greitemeyer, T., Schulz‐Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.12.1.31 · Cited by 99
Pearsall, M. J., & Venkataramani, V. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038315 · Cited by 98
Kameda, T., Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609978.016 · Cited by 92
When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making
Fraidin, S. N. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.003 · Cited by 90
Understanding agile software development practices using shared mental models theory
Yu, X., & Petter, S. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.010 · Cited by 90
The use of recognition in group decision‐making
Reimer, T. O., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2806_6 · Cited by 87
Shared Cognition in Small Groups
Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema‐Engblade, A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch1 · Cited by 87
The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making
van Knippenberg, D., Bode, H. J. M. K., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0461 · Cited by 81
Decision-Making Groups Attenuate the Discussion Bias in Favor of Shared Information: A Meta-Analysis
Reimer, T. O., Reimer, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2010) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903514318 · Cited by 80
Cruz, M. G., Boster, F. J., & Rodríguez, J. I. (1997) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365097024003004 · Cited by 80
Beyond Idea Generation: The Power of Groups in Developing Ideas
McMahon, K., Ruggeri, A., Kämmer, J. E., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2016) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1195637 · Cited by 82
Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1 · Cited by 198
Factors that May Affect the Difficulty of Uncovering Hidden Profiles
Swol, L. M. V., Savadori, L., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302030063005 · Cited by 79
Schulz‐Hardt, S., & Mojzisch, A. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.744440 · Cited by 77
Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.565 · Cited by 77
A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00091-x · Cited by 76
The use of recognition in group decision-making
Reimer, T. O., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.06.004 · Cited by 112
Chernyshenko, O. S., Miner, A. G., Baumann, M. R., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00533-2 · Cited by 75
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., & Winner, J. L. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470713181.ch10 · Cited by 78
The Role of Information Exchange in Predicting Group Accuracy on a Multiple Judgment Task
Lavery, T. A., Lavery, T. A., Franz, T. M., Lavery, T. A., Franz, T. M., Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2104_2 · Cited by 73
Self-citationCognitive Loafing, Social Conformity and Judicial Review of Agency RulemakingPreprint
Seidenfeld, M. B. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.280251 · Cited by 73
Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems
Savadori, L., Swol, L. M. V., & Sniezek, J. A. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028006002 · Cited by 72
Information Exchange in Group Decision Making: The Hidden Profile Problem Reconsidered
Lightle, J. P., Kagel, J. H., & Arkes, H. R. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0975 · Cited by 70
Human Self as Information Agent: Functioning in a Social Environment Based on Shared Meanings
Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2017) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000114 · Cited by 77
Transactive memory directories in small work units
Peltokorpi, V. (2004) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480410539515 · Cited by 66
Exploring the Hidden-Profile Paradigm
Sohrab, G., Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415599068 · Cited by 78
A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.
Park, G., & DeShon, R. P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019939 · Cited by 66
The Impact of Experts on Information Sharing During Group Discussion
Franz, T. M., & Larson, J. R. (2002) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640203300401 · Cited by 63
Self-citationIncreasing Student-Learning Team Effectiveness With Team Charters
Hunsaker, P. L., Pavett, C. M., & Hunsaker, J. S. (2011) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2010.489588 · Cited by 61
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403251933 · Cited by 64
Collective choice, collaboration, and communication
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211 · Cited by 60
Campbell, J., & Stasser, G. L. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406288976 · Cited by 59
Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving
Stasser, G. L., & Dietz-Uhler, B. L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch2 · Cited by 57
When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties?
Cojuharenco, I., & Karelaia, N. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.12.001 · Cited by 60
Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.002 · Cited by 58
The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-supported Collaborative Analysis
Convertino, G., Billman, D. O., Pirolli, P. L. T., Massar, J. P., & Shrager, J. (2008) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-008-9080-9 · Cited by 57
Rink, F. A., & Ellemers, N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209333177 · Cited by 58
Mojzisch, A., Grouneva, L., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.660 · Cited by 56
A balance theory approach to group problem solving
Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.09.001 · Cited by 60
Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.305163 · Cited by 55
Bräuer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.463 · Cited by 56
Multi‐level complexity in the management of knowledge networks
Beesley, L. G. A. (2004) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270410541051 · Cited by 53
Good Effects of Bad Feelings: Negative Affectivity and Group Decision‐making
Bode, H. J. M. K., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2009) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00675.x · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-461
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2024798540
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- group decision making, shared information, task significance, information sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review