Cited by 9,020Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.

Steele, Claude M., Aronson, Joshua·1995·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Stereotype threat is being at risk of confirming, as self-characteristic, a negative stereotype about one's group. Studies 1 and 2 varied the stereotype vulnerability of Black participants taking a difficult verbal test by varying whether or not their performance was ostensibly diagnostic of ability, and thus, whether or not they were at risk of fulfilling the racial stereotype about their intellectual ability. Reflecting the pressure of this vulnerability, Blacks underperformed in relation to Whites in the ability-diagnostic condition but not in the nondiagnostic condition (with Scholastic Aptitude Tests controlled). Study 3 validated that ability-diagnosticity cognitively activated the racial stereotype in these participants and motivated them not to conform to it, or to be judged by it. Study 4 showed that mere salience of the stereotype could impair Blacks' performance even when the test was not ability diagnostic. The role of stereotype vulnerability in the standardized test performance of ability-stigmatized groups is discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 6,801–6,900 of 8,461

Metadata

Authors
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1995-11
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
797-811
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2161923363
Cited by
9,020
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 346 · 2025: 505 · 2024: 406 · 2023: 462 · 2022: 420 · 2021: 486 · 2020: 532 · 2019: 571 · 2018: 463 · 2017: 461 · 2016: 497 · 2015: 471 · 2014: 451 · 2013: 361 · 2012: 383
FWCI
117.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051977)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
stereotype threat, African Americans, standardized test performance, racial stereotypes, test-taking motivation, racial achievement gap
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Stereotyping, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review