Cited by 1,436Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states.

Fleeson, William·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three experience-sampling studies explored the distributions of Big-Five-relevant states (behavior) across 2 to 3 weeks of everyday life. Within-person variability was high, such that the typical individual regularly and routinely manifested nearly all levels of all traits in his or her everyday behavior. Second, individual differences in central tendencies of behavioral distributions were almost perfectly stable. Third, amount of behavioral variability (and skew and kurtosis) were revealed as stable individual differences. Finally, amount of within-person variability in extraversion was shown to reflect individual differences in reactivity to extraversion-relevant situational cues. Thus, decontextualized and noncontingent Big-Five content is highly useful for descriptions of individuals' density distributions as wholes. Simultaneously, contextualized and contingent personality units (e.g., conditional traits, goals) are needed for describing the considerable within-person variation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Blake, 1971, Temperament and time of day., 109
  2. Ekman, 1994, The nature of emotion.
  3. Fiske, 1961, The inherent variability of behavior., 326
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.82 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.164 · DOI
  6. Murray, 1938, Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age.
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1296 · DOI
  8. Spielberger, 1977, Theory and measurement of anxiety states., 239
  9. 1986, Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,436

Metadata

Authors
Fleeson, W.
Corresponding author
Fleeson, William
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
80
Issue
6
Pages
1011-1027
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4322696896
Cited by
1,436
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 39
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
personality structure, personality processes, personality traits, state

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review