The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Priming a New Identity: Self-Monitoring Moderates the Effects of Nonself Primes on Self-Judgments and Behavior.
Abstract
When a construct is primed, people often act in construct-consistent ways. Several accounts for this effect have been offered, including ideomotor theory and a social functional perspective. The authors tested an additional perspective, the Active-Self account, whereby primes can temporarily alter self-perceptions. In Study 1, non-African American participants reported feeling more aggressive on an implicit measure following an African American prime. In Study 2, participants reported feeling luckier on an implicit measure following a number 7 (vs. 13) prime. In both studies, these effects were obtained only for low self-monitors, who are more likely to change self-conceptions in response to diagnostic self-information and to use their internal states in guiding behavior. Study 3 showed that low self-monitors also show larger behavioral effects of primes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority
Asch, S. E. (1956) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093718 · Cited by 4,267
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 · Cited by 2,736
Cortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683
Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umiltà, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070311 · Cited by 1,801
The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 · Cited by 1,361 · cited 1×
“Because self-relevant processing is deeper (e.g., Symons & Johnson, 1997), high private self-consciousness individuals could exhibit larger priming effects due to greater activation of the primed construct, rather than due to greater change in the self-concept.”
BackgroundMental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations.
Wilson, T. D., & Brekke, N. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.117 · Cited by 1,157 · cited 3×
“…of this interaction at one standard deviation above and below the mean of the self-monitoring distribution (Aiken & West, 1991) indicated that the main effect of priming was signif- icant for low self-monitors (B 1.36), t(56) 2.07, p .04, but not for high self-monitors (B 0.98), t(56) 1.39, p .17.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1025389814290 · Cited by 960
A Common Coding Approach to Perception and Action
Prinz, W. (1990) · Relationships Between Perception and Action · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_7 · Cited by 751
Cited by
The dynamics of proactivity at work
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002 · Cited by 2,057
Kouchaki, M., & Desai, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037796 · Cited by 344
Priming, Replication, and the Hardest Science
Cesario, J. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691613513470 · Cited by 320
Still Preoccupied with 1995: The Need to Belong and Preference for Nostalgic Products
Loveland, K. E., Smeesters, D., & Mandel, N. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/653043 · Cited by 310
Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach
Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280802643640 · Cited by 243
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- DeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 657-671
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2142758848
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 27.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Priming a New Identity: Self-Monitoring Moderates the Effects of Nonself Primes on Self-Judgments and Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.657
- The paper
- DeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Priming a New Identity: Self-Monitoring Moderates the Effects of Nonself Primes on Self-Judgments and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
