The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model.
Abstract
Traditional models of attitude change have assumed that when people appear to have changed their attitudes in response to new information, their old attitudes disappear and no longer have any impact. The present research suggests that when attitudes change, the old attitude can remain in memory and influence subsequent behavior. Four experiments are reported in which initial attitudes were created and then changed (or not) with new information. In each study, the authors demonstrate that when people undergo attitude change, their old and new attitudes can interact to produce evaluative responses consistent with a state of implicit ambivalence. In Study 1, individuals whose attitudes changed were more neutral on a measure of automatic evaluation. In Study 2, attitude change led people to show less confidence on an implicit but not an explicit measure. In Studies 3 and 4, people whose attitudes changed engaged in greater processing of attitude-relevant information than did individuals whose attitudes were not changed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Self-citationAttitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.419 · Cited by 5,256
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.1.101 · Cited by 2,112 · cited 8×
“…findings suggest that the activation and impact of old (automatic–implicit) and new (deliberative– explicit) attitudes on judgment are not necessarily an either–or phenomenon, as emphasized in much prior research (see reviews by Dovidio et al., 2001; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Wilson et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 3×
“Following Fazio et al. (1995), all primes were presented for 315 ms, followed by a 135-ms interval before onset of the target stimulus.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPetty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69 · Cited by 1,727 · cited 1×
“Instead, participants may have given only a cursory look at the CV and provided a moderate evaluation, perhaps relying on a numerosity heuristic (i.e., counting the available evidence rather than evaluating its merits; see Petty & Cacioppo, 1984).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCan people feel happy and sad at the same time?
Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684 · Cited by 1,083
Cited by
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing
Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9713 · Cited by 798
A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures
Forscher, P. S., Lai, C. K., Axt, J. R., Ebersole, C. R., Herman, M., Devine, P. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000160 · Cited by 700
Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis.
Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995 · Cited by 593
Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-41
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2075592779
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 72.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21
- The paper
- Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
