The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Effects of group size.
Abstract
Individuals and groups of 2, 3, 4, or 5 people solved 2 letters-to-numbers problems that required participants, on each trial, to identify the coding of 10 letters to 10 numbers by proposing an equation in letters, receiving the answer in letters, proposing a hypothesis, and receiving feedback on the correctness of the hypothesis. Groups of 3, 4, and 5 people proposed more complex equations and had fewer trials to solution than the best of an equivalent number of individuals. Groups of 3, 4, and 5 people had fewer trials to solution than 2-person groups but did not differ from each other. These results suggest that 3-person groups are necessary and sufficient to perform better than the best individuals on highly intellective problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These findings are consistent with previous research on group versus individual learning which showed that group learning is superior to individual learning for relatively complex problem-solving tasks (Laughlin et al. 2002;Laughlin et al. 2006) and that individual learning is superior to group learning for relatively simple recall tasks (e.g., Andersson and Rönnberg 1995;Meudell et al. 1992;Weld”
From Making the Black Box of Collaborative Learning Transparent: Combining Process-Oriented and Cognitive Load Approaches (2010) · cites this paper as Laughlin et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,371
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Teams in Organizations: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250 · Cited by 2,273
A HANDBOOK OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
&NA; (1935) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-193512000-00062 · Cited by 2,269
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497 · Cited by 1,925
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hastie, 1986, Review essay: Experimental evidence on group accuracy., 129
- Levine, 1998, Small groups., Vol. 2, 415
- Terman, 1956, Manual for Concept Mastery Test.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 390
Fathonah, S., Cahyono, E., Haryani, S., Sarwi, S., & Lestari, N. H. (2024) · International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education · doi:10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-185-200 · Cited by 18
Coulter, S. E., Coyne, P., & Andrews, D. M. (2024) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2024.1.14923 · Cited by 5
Draw to a close: inventor triad dynamics and invention quality
Ding, N., Markus, A., & Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2024) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662716.2024.2378902 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, groups outperform individuals if problems to solve are complex (Jones 2009) and outcomes are demonstrable, meaning people can make inferences about correct problem solutions (Laughlin et al. 2006).”
Krebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A., & von der Beck, I. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12647 · Cited by 7
Loizou, F. (2014) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2014.948031 · Cited by 5
Le dialogisme de la rationalité dans l'ordre de l'interaction
Trognon, A., Batt, M., & Marchetti, É. (2011) · Bulletin de psychologie · doi:10.3917/bupsy.515.0439 · Cited by 5
Performance and affects in group problem-solving
Simões, A. C. A., & Gondim, S. M. G. (2015) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.rpto.2015.09.001 · Cited by 5
Meub, L., & Proeger, T. (2017) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.010 · Cited by 5
Adams, S. K. (2007) · Cited by 5
Collaborative Divorce: A Family‐Centered Process
Nurse, A. R., & Thompson, P. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444310238.ch32 · Cited by 5
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.005.0004 · Cited by 5
Hill, K. (2010) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/lb.38.3.319 · Cited by 7
The Impact of Group Size on Decision Effectiveness
Osmani, J. (2020) · European Journal of Marketing and Economics · doi:10.26417/392xlk97w · Cited by 4
Comparing Participants’ Brainwaves During Solo, Pair, and Mob Programming
Shiraishi, M., Washizaki, H., Saito, D., & Fukazawa, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_13 · Cited by 4
Tekïn, M., Uysal, İ., Toraman, Ç., Akman, C., Koşan, A. M. A., & POSTACI, E. S. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04091-w · Cited by 4
Disciplining Deliberation: A Socio-technical Perspective on Machine Learning Trade-Offs
Fazelpour, S. (2025) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/734552 · Cited by 5
Stouten, H., Polet, H., Heene, A., & Gellynck, X. (2017) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2464 · Cited by 4
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., Seng, C. H., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2015) · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli.12.2015.7681 · Cited by 4
Smith, M. J., & Wilkinson, T. (2018) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2018.0000208.1 · Cited by 4
“As highlighted by Levinson et al. (2007), autonomous learning is thought to be disadvantageous whilst Laughlin et al. (2006)suggested that working in small groups is beneficial to learning.”
BackgroundDreu, C. K. W. D., de Wilde, T. R. W., & Velden, F. S. T. (2021) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-021-09739-w · Cited by 5
User innovation: a novel framework for studying animal innovation within a comparative context
Hopper, L. M., & Torrance, A. W. (2019) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01303-z · Cited by 4
Connexions dans l'histoire de la logique interlocutoire
Trognon, A. (2012) · Connexions · doi:10.3917/cnx.098.0083 · Cited by 4
Experimental Studies of Human Behavior in Social Computing Systems
Mao, Q. (2015) · Cited by 4
Cooper, D. J., Higgins, S., & Beckmann, N. (2017) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/0047239516669104 · Cited by 4
Kameda, T., Hastie, R., Tsukasaki, T., & Berg, N. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1677169 · Cited by 6
The Power of Diversity Over Large Solution SpacesPreprint
LiCalzi, M., & Sürücü, O. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2037869 · Cited by 5
Trognon, A., & Batt, M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1863 · Cited by 4
Yonah, M., & Kessler, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.173 · Cited by 4
Li, S., Yu, L., Gan, X., Hou, Y., Pan, Y., Luo, Y., & Hu, Y. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120700 · Cited by 3
“Collective benefit manifests across different scenarios, including perception (Brennan et al., 2008), decision-making (Bahrami et al., 2010), and problem-solving (Laughlin et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMoral-dilemma judgments by individuals and groups: Are many heads really more utilitarian than one?
Rokosz, M., Białek, M., Stefańczyk, M., & Gawronski, B. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106053 · Cited by 4
Roslan, N. S., Izhar, L. I., Saad, M. N. M., & Sivapalan, S. (2015) · IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) · doi:10.1109/scored.2015.7449361 · Cited by 3
Patterns for Certification Standards
Delmas, K., Pagetti, C., & Polacsek, T. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_26 · Cited by 3
Abdel‐Razig, S., Ling, J. O. E., Harhara, T., Smitasin, N., Lum, L. H.-W., & Ibrahim, H. (2021) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-20-00844.1 · Cited by 3
How Does the Internet Change Group Processes?
Schindler, J. (2022) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748928232-96 · Cited by 4
Kollektive Informationsverarbeitung von Medieninhalten
Schindler, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42534-0 · Cited by 5
How groups manage conflict when using model-driven decision support: An epistemic motivation lens
Engin, A., Franco, L. A., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2024) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2024.103142 · Cited by 4
On the Epistemic Value of Reflection
Ambardekar, P. (2024) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.6784 · Cited by 4
“But the group collectively manages to converge on the right answer (Laughlin et al. 2006).”
BackgroundGiving in to Group Pressure: The Impact of Socialization and Risk on Perceived Outcomes
McIntyre, K. A., & Platania, J. (2009) · Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) · Cited by 3
Dudda, M., Schmidt, K., Schmitting, W., & Wömpener, A. (2009) · Zeitschrift für Planung & Unternehmenssteuerung · doi:10.1007/s00187-009-0084-5 · Cited by 3
Barnschen, S., Walter, G., & Merkwitz, R. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000325 · Cited by 3
Personal epistemology and spontaneous small groups
Morell-Ruiz, M., García, R. B., & Díaz-Méndez, R. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2020.1769032 · Cited by 3
Principles of European Community law : commentary and materials
Bronitt, S., Burns, F., & Kinley, D. (1995) · Law Book Co. · Cited by 3
Prudence, Ethics and Anticipation in Visionary Leaders
Farmer, Y. (2021) · Journal of Values-Based Leadership · doi:10.22543/0733.151.1367 · Cited by 3
Smith, J. J., & Wald, B. (2019) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1766 · Cited by 3
IMPACT OF CHANGES IN A PROJECT TEAM STRUCTURE ON THE TEAM PERFORMANCE
Nukić, I. Š., Galić, M., & Dolaček–Alduk, Z. (2015) · Elektronički časopis građevinskog fakulteta Osijek · doi:10.13167/2015.10.7 · Cited by 3
Poponi, D. M. (2009) · Digital Commons - PCOM (Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine) · Cited by 3
Sheikhrezaei, K. (2019) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.5080 · Cited by 4
Validating a forced-choice method for eliciting quality-of-reasoning judgments
Marcoci, A., Webb, M. E., Rowe, L. I., Barnett, A., Primoratz, T., Kruger, A., Karvetski, C. W., Stone, B., Diamond, M. L., Saletta, M., et al. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02234-x · Cited by 2
“Group performance usually improves with increasing group size, especially for problems of moderate difficulty that require understanding of verbal, quantitative, or logical conceptual systems (Laughlin et al., 2002, 2006; Woolley et al., 2010, Trouche et al., 2014).”
BackgroundWang, X., & Wang, C. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102135 · Cited by 4
Uncovering Transferable Collaboration Patterns Across Tasks Using Large Language Models
Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Cui, W., Kerzabi, E., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98417-4_23 · Cited by 2
A Common Force-Sharing Pattern in Joint Action That Consists of Four People
Masumoto, J., & Inui, N. (2017) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2017.1411331 · Cited by 2
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0015 · Cited by 2
Younghusband, C. H., & Koehn, D. A. (2021) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v22i2.553 · Cited by 2
Kang, M., Li, S., & Kang, M. (2025) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2025.2487824 · Cited by 2
“Laughlin et al. (2006) state that the greater complexity of organizations has increased the horizontal communication that permits a lateral or diagonal flow of information.”
Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity
Kraemer, B., Müller, P., Peiser, W., & Verlagsgesellschaft, N. (2022) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748928232 · Cited by 2
Problem Solving Through Cooperative Learning in the Chemistry Classroom
Cardellini, L. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4366-3_8 · Cited by 2
A Three-Dimensional View of Complex Product Development Management
Yassine, A. (2018) · IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) · doi:10.1109/temscon.2018.8488394 · Cited by 2
Size Matters: How Big Should a Military Design Team be?
Hammerstrom, M. L. (2012) · Ike Skelton Combined Arms Research Library (CARL) Digital Library (US Army Combined Arms Center) · Cited by 2
Structured groups make more accurate veracity judgements than individuals
Hamlin, I., Bolger, F., Vasilichi, A., Belton, I., Crawford, M. M., Sissons, A., Lūka, C. T. B., & Wright, G. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3892 · Cited by 2
Exploiting Meta-cognitive Features for a Machine-Learning-Based One-Shot Group-Decision Aggregation
Shinitzky, H., Avraham, D., Vaisman, Y., Tsizer, Y., Leedon, Y., & D, Y. S. M. (2023) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-023-09855-9 · Cited by 2
“…the problem (Amir et al. 2013), low demonstrability of the solution of strategic problems to other group members (Amir et al. 2018), negative effects of group interactions, and more (Bah-rami et al. 2010; Koriat et al. 2018; Laughlin and Ellis 1986; Laughlin et al. 2006; Levine and Tindale 2015).”
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0010 · Cited by 2
Defining Creativity Through Assessment
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0003 · Cited by 3
Knowledge Spillover, Trust, Effort, and Error Exposure in Peer‐Assisted Learning
Juvina, I., Carson, J., Menke, P., Crowe, P., Wong, C. H., & McNett, H. (2025) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.70009 · Cited by 3
Physics Structure Analysis of Parallel Waves Concept of Physics Teacher Candidate
Sarwi, S., Supardi, K. I., & Linuwih, S. (2017) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012011 · Cited by 2
Richardson, E., & Keil, F. C. (2020) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 2
CALL-infused project-based learning: a case study of adult ESL students learning prepositions
Lee, S. (2014) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/etd-180810-3723 · Cited by 2
Teacher Moments: an online platform for preservice teachers to practice parent-teacher conversationsPreprint
Thompson, M., Robinson, K., Kim, Y. J., Reich, J., & Owho-Ovuakporie, K. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/26wkf · Cited by 2
Task Complexity And Effectiveness Of Pair Programming: An Experimental Study
Balijepally, V. (2007) · UTA ResearchCommons (University of Texas Arlington) · Cited by 2
Gunderman, R. B. (2010) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3279 · Cited by 1
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0011 · Cited by 1
Borahima, D. Q. P. M., & Retnowati, E. (2023) · Jurnal Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika · doi:10.14421/jppm.2023.52.103-116 · Cited by 1
The meta-aggregation approaches: Correctly choosing how to choose correctly in groups
Shinitzky, H., Parpara, O., Ezrets, M., Klein, R., & D, Y. S. M. (2025) · Collective Intelligence · doi:10.1177/26339137251315410 · Cited by 3
“…problem (Amir et al., 2013), low demonstrability of the solution of strategic problems to other group members (Amir et al., 2018), negative effects of group interactions, and more (Bahrami et al., 2010; Koriat et al., 2018; Laughlin and Ellis, 1986; Laughlin et al., 2006; Levine and Tindale, 2015).”
Do, L. A., & Thomas, A. K. (2025) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.70008 · Cited by 1
“This approach is consistent with prior research using the letters-to-numbers problem to examine collaborative problem-solving (Laughlin et al., 2006, 2008).”
Murphy, K. A., Murphy, S., O’Brien, S., & Cutting, S. (2025) · The Australian Educational Researcher · doi:10.1007/s13384-025-00892-8 · Cited by 1
The Task Space: An Integrative Framework for Team Research
Hu, X. E., Whiting, M. E., Gandhi, L., Watts, D. J., & Almaatouq, A. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03544 · Cited by 2
Learning from complex cognitive tasks: comparing groups to individuals
Kirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2008) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 1
A note on human computation limits
Rohwer, P. (2010) · doi:10.1145/1837885.1837897 · Cited by 1
“[14] The result led Professor Robert Cialdini and his co-authors to suggest that the cause was the diversity of opinion and the power of parallel processing.”
Predicting post‐meeting work activity in software development projects
Crawford, J., & Leonard, L. N. K. (2012) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/13527591211207716 · Cited by 1
Complementary and Synchronous Force Production in Joint Action
Inui, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1765-1_4 · Cited by 1
Oah, S., Shon, D., & Moon, K. (2018) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-018-0303-2 · Cited by 1
The Benefits to Inquiry Argument
Lougheed, K. (2019) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34503-7_4 · Cited by 1
Brix, J., Jakobsen, H. S., & Jordansen, I. K. (2012) · Cited by 1
Mitchell, A. S., & Rodis, L. (2020) · Smith College Studies in Social Work · doi:10.1080/00377317.2020.1706337 · Cited by 1
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.003.0002 · Cited by 3
Reconceptualising teaching portfolios for professional development in engineering education
Winberg, C. (2022) · The Southern journal of engineering education. · doi:10.15641/sjee.v1i1.1418 · Cited by 1
An experimental test of gaming incentives
Banuri, S., Danková, K., & Keefer, P. E. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.05.015 · Cited by 1
Flock size does not influence escape decisions of urban lawn-foraging birds
Zhao, J., Song, X.-R., Yang, X.-Y., Xie, Y., & Yang, X.-N. (2024) · Wildlife Research · doi:10.1071/wr23042 · Cited by 1
der Biest, M. V., Verschooren, S., Verbruggen, F., & Braß, M. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319039 · Cited by 2
“On one hand, integrating information from multiple sources has been shown to enhance task performance [26,27], facilitate efficient problem solving [28], improve motor performance [29], and increase the identification of misinformation [30], making it a key aspect of group behavior [1].”
Berch, D. B. (2007) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-60752-588-220251004 · Cited by 1
Batt, M., & Trognon, A. (2014) · Logic, argumentation & reasoning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9_9 · Cited by 1
Wobeng, N. B. M., Clautilde, M., Mandou, M. S., Madou, C., & Marie, M. P. (2019) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n9p389 · Cited by 1
Arima, Y. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84698-5_2 · Cited by 1
Do Teams Perform Better than Singles? : Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry in Korea
Kim, J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business · doi:10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no1.9 · Cited by 1
“However, the work of Hamilton et al. (2003) is conducted using an extremely limited sample, and the work of Laughlin et al. (2006) is conducted in a laboratory setting.”
Menschliche Potentiale und Hindernisse für demokratische Deliberation
König, P. D. (2014) · ZPTh – Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie · doi:10.3224/zpth.v5i2.17120 · Cited by 1
Gruppenleistung und Gruppenlernen bei der Steuerung dynamischer Systeme
Drewes, S. (2013) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-4283 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., & Boh, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 644-651
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2125970110
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- group problem solving, group size, hypothesis testing, feedback, group versus individual performance
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Cooperative Behavior, Group Processes, Humans, Illinois, Problem Solving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review