The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation.
Abstract
Three experiments examined the effectiveness of interpersonal confrontations as a means for decreasing stereotypic responding. After making stereotypic inferences about Black individuals, participants were confronted and reactions were measured across various intrapersonal and interpersonal response domains. Confrontations varied in level of hostility (Experiment 1) and whether they were expressed by a Black or White person (Experiment 2). Results indicate that although confrontations (and particularly hostile ones) elicited negative emotions and evaluations toward the confronter, participants also experienced negative self-directed affect. Furthermore, regardless of who did the confronting or how much hostility was expressed, confronted participants subsequently were less likely to provide stereotypic responses (Experiments 1-2), and the effect of the confrontation generalized to reporting less prejudiced attitudes (Experiment 3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,312
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory.
Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076760 · Cited by 3,703
Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.5 · Cited by 2,378 · cited 4×
“On the basis of the findings of Baumeister, Smart, and Boden (1996) , Baumeister and Campbell (1999) argued that “when people feel that their favorable self-images or reputations have been impugned by someone, they may become motivated to attack that person in a violent or aggressive fashion” (p. 218).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding
Scott, W. A. (1955) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266577 · Cited by 1,853
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 1×
“vated to avoid being perceived by others as prejudiced ( Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; Plant & Devine, 1998), may be less likely to engage in biased responding in the future to avoid such public dispute or disapproval.”
Background
Cited by
Brondolo, E., Brady ver Halen, N., Pencille, M., Beatty, D., & Contrada, R. J. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-008-9193-0 · Cited by 813
The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing.
Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.76 · Cited by 344
Radke, H. R. M., Kutlaca, M., Siem, B., Wright, S. C., & Becker, J. C. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868320918698 · Cited by 334
Bertrand, P., Guegan, J., Robieux, L., McCall, C. A., & Zenasni, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00026 · Cited by 292
Predicting Behavior During Interracial Interactions: A Stress and Coping Approach
Trawalter, S., Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868309345850 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 784-803
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2144771163
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 23.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
- The paper
- Czopp, A. M., Monteith, M. J., & Mark, A. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
