CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,398Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologySport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.

Mullen, Brian, Copper, Carolyn·1994·Psychological Bulletin
DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract : This paper reports on a meta-analytic integration of the relation between group cohesiveness and performance. Overall, the cohesiveness-performance effect was highly significant and of small magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the cohesiveness-performance effect were examined. This effect was significantly stronger when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of measurements of group members' perceptions of cohesiveness than when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of experimental inductions of cohesiveness. The results of this analysis suggest that the more direct effect may be from performance to cohesiveness rather than from cohesiveness to performance. Discussion considers the implications of these results for future research on the relation between cohesiveness and performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 104 references

1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mullen, B., & Copper, C.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
ORCID
Mullen, Brian
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1994-03
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
210-227
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
DOI
10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
OpenAlex
W1980511580
Cited by
1,398
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 75
FWCI
30.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
group cohesion, group performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review