The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Abstract
Abstract : This paper reports on a meta-analytic integration of the relation between group cohesiveness and performance. Overall, the cohesiveness-performance effect was highly significant and of small magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the cohesiveness-performance effect were examined. This effect was significantly stronger when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of measurements of group members' perceptions of cohesiveness than when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of experimental inductions of cohesiveness. The results of this analysis suggest that the more direct effect may be from performance to cohesiveness rather than from cohesiveness to performance. Discussion considers the implications of these results for future research on the relation between cohesiveness and performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, there is robust evidence that cohesion contributes to performance, productivity, and behavioral change15,20–23.”
From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Review of personality and social psychology
Wheeler, L. S., & Shaver, P. R. (1980) · UMI Books on Demand · Cited by 3,593
Attention and Self-Regulation : A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,580
Informal social communication.
Festinger, L. (1950) · Research Center for Dynamics Institute for Social Research eBooks · doi:10.1037/10646-001 · Cited by 1,317
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
Mullen, B. R., Brown, R. J., & Smith, C. (1992) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationDeviation, rejection and communication
Schachter, S. (1951) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062326 · Cited by 1,165
Social Pressures in Informal Groups, a Study of Human Factors in Housing
Keller, M., Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1952) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348388 · Cited by 1,103
Mullen, B. R., & Goethals, G. R. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3 · Cited by 985
Self-citationProgress In Small Group Research
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101 · Cited by 946
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. L. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · Cited by 914
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Cunningham, G. B. (2007) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.21.1.58 · Cited by 30
Group decision-making in software architecture: A study on industrial practices
Smrithi Rekha, V., & Muccini, H. (2018) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.04.009 · Cited by 31
Packer, D. (2014) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12017 · Cited by 26
The Nature of Norms in Individual Sport Teams
Colman, M. M., & Carron, A. V. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200204 · Cited by 29
Effects of serious games on perceived team cohesiveness in a multi-user virtual environment
Bozanta, A., Kutlu, B., Nowlan, N. S., & Shirmohammadi, S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.042 · Cited by 29
Susskind, A. M., & Odom-Reed, P. R. (2016) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215626972 · Cited by 29
Spink, K. S. (1998) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.2.2.92 · Cited by 29
Toward a Group Facilitation Technique for Project Teams
Witte, E. H. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078694 · Cited by 29
Project managers doubling as client account executives
Webber, S. S., & Torti, M. T. (2004) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2004.12690049 · Cited by 28
Huang, Y., & Liu, C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.002 · Cited by 30
Shaner, M. B., Beeler, L. L., & Noble, C. H. (2016) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12327 · Cited by 28
Escape from the factory of the robot monsters: agents of change
Richards, D. (2017) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-10-2015-0052 · Cited by 28
Assessment of Teams in a Digital Game Environment
Mayer, I. S. (2018) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878118770831 · Cited by 29
Homophily in Personality Enhances Group Success Among Real-Life Friends
Laakasuo, M., Rotkirch, A., van Duijn, M. J., Berg, V., Jokela, M. M., Dávid-Barrett, T., Miettinen, A., Pearce, E., & Dunbar, R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00710 · Cited by 34
Longitudinal studies on cohesion in a military context – A systematic review
Brandebo, M. F., Börjesson, M., & Hilmarsson, H. (2022) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2022.2041995 · Cited by 49
Rico, R., Bachrach, D. G., Sánchez‐Manzanares, M., & Collins, B. J. (2011) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.495206 · Cited by 32
The Impact of Interpersonal Perceptions on Team Processes
LeDoux, J. A., Gorman, C. A., & Woehr, D. J. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496411425190 · Cited by 28
Lee, D., Hung, L.-M., & Chen, M.-L. (2012) · Journal of Management and Sustainability · doi:10.5539/jms.v2n2p43 · Cited by 28
Trying Harder for Different Reasons
Lount, R. B., Messé, L. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2000) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.31.4.221 · Cited by 28
The effects of local socio-political events on group cohesion in online far-right communities
Bliuc, A.-M., Betts, J. M., Faulkner, N., Vergani, M., Chow, R. J., Iqbal, M., & Best, D. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230302 · Cited by 27
How contextual factors influence athlete experiences of team cohesion: an in-depth exploration
Anderson, A. J., & Dixon, M. A. (2018) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1527381 · Cited by 27
de Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00288-5 · Cited by 33
Profile of high-performing college soccer teams: An exploratory multi-level analysis
Filho, E., Gershgoren, L., Basevitch, I., & Tenenbaum, G. (2014) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.05.008 · Cited by 27
Evaluating effective management learning
Bramley, P. (1999) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090599910261826 · Cited by 27
What Can Student Bystanders Do to Prevent School Violence?
Wilson‐Simmons, R., Dash, K. R., Tehranifar, P., O’Donnell, L. N., & Stueve, A. (2006) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1300/j202v05n01_04 · Cited by 27
Conflict, Trust, and Cohesion: Examining Affective and Attitudinal Factors in Science Teams
Fiore, S. M., Carter, D. R., & Asencio, R. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017011 · Cited by 52
The impact of a sales team’s perceived entitativity on customer satisfaction
Wang, C., Hoegg, J., & Dahl, D. W. (2018) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0573-2 · Cited by 27
On Understanding the Divergence of Online Social Group Discussion
Purohit, H., Ruan, Y., Fuhry, D., Parthasarathy, S., & Sheth, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14557 · Cited by 27
Ethnicity, Modern Prejudice and the Quality of Life
Zumbo, B. D. (2003) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0389-5_18 · Cited by 27
The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimovíc, S., Großmann, G., Ladjal, D., & Pardo, A. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5 · Cited by 26
Exploring the Antecedents to Learning Continuance in Virtual Worlds
Liu, N., Yang, X., & Chan, H. C. (2013) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2013040101 · Cited by 26
The impact of team and work characteristics on team functioning
Molleman, E., & Slomp, J. (2005) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20041 · Cited by 26
Thomas, W. E., Brown, R. J., Easterbrook, M. J., Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., D’Angelo, C., & Holt, J. J. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12277 · Cited by 29
Manata, B. (2019) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051819842792 · Cited by 29
Temporary Work and Deviant Behavior the Role of Workplace Cohesion
Akkerman, A., Sluiter, R., & Jansen, G. (2020) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2019.1711267 · Cited by 26
Peer-Assessing Peers' Contribution to EFL Group Presentations
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2009) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688209105868 · Cited by 26
The Effect of Process Training on Process and Outcomes in Virtual Groups
Tullar, W. L., & Kaiser, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194360003700404 · Cited by 26
Increases in Network Ties Are Associated With Increased Cohesion Among Intervention Participants
Gesell, S. B., Barkin, S. L., Sommer, E. C., Thompson, J. R., & Valente, T. W. (2015) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198115599397 · Cited by 26
Segal, M. W., Smith, D. G., Segal, D. R., & Canuso, A. A. (2016) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-15-00342 · Cited by 26
Whiting, S. W., & Maynes, T. D. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000067 · Cited by 27
Psychological diversity and team interaction processes
Afolabi, O. A., & Ehigie, B. O. (2005) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/13527590510635161 · Cited by 26
Methods for the measurement of consensual beliefs within groups.
Gideon, I. C. L., & Schaller, M. (1998) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.2.4.241 · Cited by 31
Täuber, S., & Sassenberg, K. (2012) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0028377 · Cited by 24
Assessing Group Performance from Collective Behavior
Olguı́n, D. (2010) · Cited by 26
Leadership and Team Cohesiveness Across CulturesPreprint
Wendt, H., & Euwema, M. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.609306 · Cited by 26
Exploring the association between relationship conflict and group performance.
Manata, B. (2016) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000047 · Cited by 25
The impact of group cohesion on key success measures in higher education
Thornton, C., Miller, P. E., & Perry, K. (2019) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1594727 · Cited by 25
Forgas, J. P., & Fitness, J. (2008) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203888124-10 · Cited by 25
Bridges, S., Chan, L. K., Chen, J. Y., Tsang, J. P. Y., & Ganotice, F. A. (2020) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104569 · Cited by 26
Cohesion in human–autonomy teams: an approach for future research
Lakhmani, S. G., Neubauer, C. E., Krausman, A., Fitzhugh, S. M., Berg, S. K., Wright, J. L., Rovira, E. M., Blackman, J., & Schaefer, K. E. (2022) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2022.2033876 · Cited by 29
Chapter 11 The Social Consequences of Expressing Emotional Ambivalence in Groups and Teams
ROTHMAN, N., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2007) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(07)10011-6 · Cited by 25
Loving one's job: Construct development and implications for individual well-being
Kelloway, E., Inness, M., Barling, J., Francis, L., & Turner, N. (2010) · Research in occupational stress and well being · doi:10.1108/s1479-3555(2010)0000008006 · Cited by 22
The Teams Corpus and Entrainment in Multi-Party Spoken Dialogues
Litman, D. J., Paletz, S. B. F., Rahimi, Z., Allegretti, S., & Rice, C. A. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1149 · Cited by 25
The Shape up Challenge: A Community-Based Worksite Exercise Competition
Blake, S. M., Caspersen, C. J., Finnegan, J. R., Crow, R. A., Mittlemark, M. B., & Ringhofer, K. R. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.1.23 · Cited by 25
The multilevel nature of team‐based work research
Molleman, E. (2005) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/13527590510606316 · Cited by 25
Chen, C., Hong, Y.-C., & Chen, P.-C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2014.2305918 · Cited by 24
Alfano, H., & Collins, D. J. (2020) · Managing Sport and Leisure · doi:10.1080/23750472.2020.1727768 · Cited by 24
Jackson, J. W. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496408322761 · Cited by 24
Group norms, media preferences, and group meeting success: A longitudinal study
Guo, Z., Tan, F. B., Turner, T., & Xu, H. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.001 · Cited by 24
Cohesion and Outcome in Short-Term Psychodynamic Groups for Complicated Grief
Kipnes, D. R., Piper, W. E., & Joyce, A. S. (2002) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1521/ijgp.52.4.483.45525 · Cited by 24
Neil, R., Wagstaff, C. R. D., Weller, E., & Lewis, R. (2016) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/14697017.2015.1134624 · Cited by 24
Firo-B: The Power of Love and the Love of Power
Fisher, S. G., Macrosson, W. D. K., & Walker, C. A. (1995) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.1.195 · Cited by 24
Leadership's Activation of Team Cohesion As A Strategic Asset: An Empirical Simulation
Michalisin, M. D., Karau, S. J., & Tangpong, C. (1970) · Journal of Business Strategies · doi:10.54155/jbs.24.1.1-26 · Cited by 24
Levine, J. M., Alexander, K., & Hansen, T. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391381.003.0024 · Cited by 23
Good and bad group performance: Same process—different outcomes
Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Dykema‐Engblade, A., & Kluwe, K. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212454928 · Cited by 23
Engendering cohesive software development teams: Should we focus on interdependence or autonomy?
Kakar, A. K. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.11.001 · Cited by 24
A multiplex view of leadership structure in management teams
Song, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2020) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12388 · Cited by 25
Cole, C., O’Connell, A., Gong, Z., Jablokow, K., Mohammad, S., Ritter, S. C., Heininger, K., Marhefka, J., & Miller, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4055434 · Cited by 28
[A measure of team cohesion in sport. Spanish adaptation of Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ)].
Iturbide, L. M., Elosua, P., & Yanes, F. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 23
Hirunyawipada, T., Paswan, A. K., & Blankson, C. (2015) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-02-2014-0042 · Cited by 23
Agent‐Based Modeling of Collaborative Problem Solving
Bergner, Y., Andrews, J. J., Zhu, M., & Gonzales, J. E. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12113 · Cited by 23
What characterizes effective management teams? A research-based approach.
Bang, H., & Midelfart, T. N. (2017) · Consulting psychology journal · doi:10.1037/cpb0000098 · Cited by 39
Ferguson, A. J., Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2019) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601119840941 · Cited by 22
Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1738530 · Cited by 23
Cohesion and individual well-being of members in self-managed teams
Markova, G., & Perry, J. T. (2014) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-04-12-0058 · Cited by 29
Çomu, S., Iorio, J., Taylor, J. E., & Dossick, C. S. (2012) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000610 · Cited by 23
Towards high performance software teamwork
Weimar, E., Nugroho, A., Visser, J., & Plaat, A. (2013) · International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) · doi:10.1145/2460999.2461030 · Cited by 24
Selecting and Composing Cohesive Teams
Bell, S. T., & Brown, S. G. U. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017008 · Cited by 23
The Role of Latent Beliefs and Group Cohesion in Predicting Group Decision Support Systems Success
Schwarz, A., & Schwarz, C. (2007) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406296959 · Cited by 23
Bennett, J. B., & Lehman, W. E. K. (1996) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10215-004 · Cited by 23
The Influence of Teamwork Quality on Software Team PerformancePreprint
Weimar, E., Nugroho, A., Visser, J., Plaat, A., Goudbeek, M. B., & Schouten, A. P. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.06146 · Cited by 35
Predicting cooperative work satisfaction of autonomous groups using a wiki tool in higher education
García, C., & Privado, J. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1764590 · Cited by 24
Layaman, L., Harahap, P., Djastuti, I., Jaelani, A., & Djuwita, D. (2021) · Verslas teorija ir praktika · doi:10.3846/btp.2021.13365 · Cited by 38
Marcos, F. M. L., García‐Calvo, T., González, I. P., Miguel, P. A. S., & Sánchez‐Oliva, D. (2010) · Cited by 22
Towards a Cohesive Theory of Cohesion
McLeod, J. L., & von Treuer, K. M. (2013) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · doi:10.18533/ijbsr.v3i12.338 · Cited by 23
Different Ways to Introduce a Business Simulation: The Effect on Student Performance
Snow, S., Gehlen, F. L., & Green, J. C. (2002) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878102238617 · Cited by 22
Pearson, A. W., Bergiel, E. B., & Barnett, T. (2014) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2014.911174 · Cited by 27
Individuum und Handeln – Sportpsychologie
Conzelmann, A., Hänsel, F., & Höner, O. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37546-0_9 · Cited by 22
Team Learning in a Multinational Military Staff Exercise
Hedlund, E., Börjesson, M., & Österberg, J. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414568462 · Cited by 39
Repeatability in the contact calling system of Spix's disc-winged bat (Thyroptera tricolor)
Chaverri, G., & Gillam, E. H. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.140197 · Cited by 21
Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., Sommer, S. A., & Passos, A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1534-085620150000017005 · Cited by 25
Lee, J., Wang, G. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2018) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051818757692 · Cited by 29
Avgerinos, E., Fragkos, I., & Huang, Y. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726719857122 · Cited by 22
Case Study: A Team-Building Mental Skills Training Program with an Intercollegiate Equestrian Team
Bloom, G. A., & Stevens, D. E. (2002) · Cited by 22
Cultural diversity and learning teams: The impact on desired academic team processes
Watson, W. E., BarNir, A., & Pavur, R. (2005) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.001 · Cited by 22
A Multifaceted Concept of Group Maturity and Its Measurement and Relationship to Group Performance
Wekselberg, V., Goggin, W. C., & Collings, T. J. (1997) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496497281001 · Cited by 22
Academic and non-cognitive effects of small classes
Finn, J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.006 · Cited by 23
Team Situation Awareness, Cohesion, and Autonomic Synchrony
Guastello, S. J., Bednarczyk, C., Hagan, R., Johnson, C., Marscisek, L., McGuigan, L. M., & Peressini, A. F. (2022) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208221118301 · Cited by 23
A review of Butler and Hardy's (1992) performance profiling procedure within sport
Weston, N. J. V., Greenlees, I. A., & Thelwell, R. (2012) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2012.674543 · Cited by 21
Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations
Proserpio, L., & Magni, M. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.09.002 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullen, B., & Copper, C.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Mullen, Brian
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-227
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1980511580
- Cited by
- 1,398
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- group cohesion, group performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review