The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Abstract
Abstract : This paper reports on a meta-analytic integration of the relation between group cohesiveness and performance. Overall, the cohesiveness-performance effect was highly significant and of small magnitude. Several theoretically informative determinants of the cohesiveness-performance effect were examined. This effect was significantly stronger when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of measurements of group members' perceptions of cohesiveness than when cohesiveness was operationalized in terms of experimental inductions of cohesiveness. The results of this analysis suggest that the more direct effect may be from performance to cohesiveness rather than from cohesiveness to performance. Discussion considers the implications of these results for future research on the relation between cohesiveness and performance.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, there is robust evidence that cohesion contributes to performance, productivity, and behavioral change15,20–23.”
From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Review of personality and social psychology
Wheeler, L. S., & Shaver, P. R. (1980) · UMI Books on Demand · Cited by 3,593
Attention and Self-Regulation : A Control-Theory Approach to Human Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,580
Informal social communication.
Festinger, L. (1950) · Research Center for Dynamics Institute for Social Research eBooks · doi:10.1037/10646-001 · Cited by 1,317
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration
Mullen, B. R., Brown, R. J., & Smith, C. (1992) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220202 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationDeviation, rejection and communication
Schachter, S. (1951) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0062326 · Cited by 1,165
Social Pressures in Informal Groups, a Study of Human Factors in Housing
Keller, M., Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1952) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348388 · Cited by 1,103
Mullen, B. R., & Goethals, G. R. (1987) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3 · Cited by 985
Self-citationProgress In Small Group Research
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.003101 · Cited by 946
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. L. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.698 · Cited by 914
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Structural interdependence in teams: An integrative framework and meta-analysis.
Courtright, S. H., Thurgood, G. R., Stewart, G. L., & Pierotti, A. J. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000027 · Cited by 254
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Pearce, C. L. (2003) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(03)00020-2 · Cited by 249
Measuring Team Cohesion: Observations from the Science
Salas, E., Grossman, R., Hughes, A. M., & Coultas, C. W. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815578267 · Cited by 236
Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies
Elenkov, D. S. (2002) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00174-0 · Cited by 237
Cumulative Meta-Analysis: A Consideration of Indicators of Sufficiency and Stability
Mullen, B. R., Muellerleile, P. A., & Bryant, B. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672012711006 · Cited by 254
Self-citationTeam member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects
Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.06.005 · Cited by 262
Determinants and Structural Relation of Personal Efficacy to Collective Efficacy
Ballesteros, R. F., Díez-Nicolás, J., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00081 · Cited by 232
“I Used to Think Women Were Weak”: Orthodox Masculinity, Gender Segregation, and Sport
Anderson, E. (2008) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00058.x · Cited by 227
The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences
Whitehouse, H., Jong, J., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, Á., Bastian, B. B., Kavanagh, C. M., Newson, M., Matthews, M., Lanman, J. A., McKay, R., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44292 · Cited by 224
The Evolutionary Significance of Affect in Groups: Communication and Group Bonding
Spoor, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (2004) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430204046145 · Cited by 225
Leadership and team cohesiveness across cultures
Wendt, H., Euwema, M., & van Emmerik, I. H. (2009) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.005 · Cited by 224
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002 · Cited by 248
Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion–performance literature
Casey‐Campbell, M., & Martens, M. L. (2008) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x · Cited by 249
Man, D. C., & Lam, S. S. K. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.227 · Cited by 215
Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation
Godemann, J. (2008) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620802469188 · Cited by 213
Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.008 · Cited by 213
THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCE
Porter, T. W., & Lilly, B. (1996) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022787 · Cited by 215
Leadership across levels: Levels of leaders and their levels of impact
DeChurch, L. A., Hiller, N. J., Murase, T., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.009 · Cited by 211
Networks That Alter Teaching: conceptualizations, exchanges and experiments
Huberman, M. (1995) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/1354060950010204 · Cited by 210
Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Barrick, M. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00334.x · Cited by 215
Heuzé, J.-P., Raimbault, N., & Fontayne, P. (2005) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410500127736 · Cited by 207
Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more?
Hoegl, M., Gibbert, M., & Mazursky, D. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.018 · Cited by 213
Hernandez, S. A. (2002) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/0273475302241009 · Cited by 203
The Pre-Deal Phase of Mergers and Acquisitions: A Review and Research Agenda
Guerra, X. W., Pavićević, S., Keil, T. J., & Laamanen, T. M. M. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319886908 · Cited by 226
Social Categorization, Depersonalization, and Group Behavior
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch3 · Cited by 208
Collaborative Creativity—Group Creativity and Team Innovation
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., & Kohn, N. W. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374714-3.00014-8 · Cited by 218
Williams, E. A., Duray, R., & Reddy, V. K. (2006) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562905276740 · Cited by 216
The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.156 · Cited by 202
Molleman, E. (2005) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7 · Cited by 198
Distributed coordination space: Toward a theory of distributed team process and performance
Fiore, S. M., Eduardo Salas, A., Cuevas, H. M., & Bowers, C. A. (2003) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922021000049971 · Cited by 196
A Document Analysis Method for Characterizing Design Team Performance
Dong, A., Hill, A. W., & Agogino, A. M. (2003) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.1711818 · Cited by 188
Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Bertani, M., Bissoli, S., Cristofalo, D., Marrella, G., Ceccato, E., Cremonese, C., De Rossi, M., Lazzarotto, L., et al. (2009) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060871 · Cited by 187
Impact of Team Integration and Group Cohesion on Project Delivery Performance
Franz, B. W., Leicht, R., Molenaar, K. R., & Messner, J. (2016) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001219 · Cited by 186
Antecedents and Performance Consequences of Helping Behavior in Work Groups
Ng, K., & Dyne, L. V. (2005) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601104269107 · Cited by 193
The Social and Interactive Dimensions of Collaborative Learning
Miyake, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519526.026 · Cited by 192
Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining.
Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Brodt, S. E. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.66 · Cited by 207
Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Virtual and Physical Environments
Hoyt, C. L., & Blascovich, J. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403257527 · Cited by 181
Estimating Cohesion in Small Groups Using Audio-Visual Nonverbal Behavior
Hung, H., & Gática-Pérez, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2010.2055233 · Cited by 193
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
Performance and Perceptions of Brainstormers in an Organizational Setting
Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Ortega, A. H. (1995) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.1995.9646143 · Cited by 180
Nakata, C. C., & Im, S. (2010) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00735.x · Cited by 188
A Quantitative Integration of the Military Cohesion Literature
Oliver, L. W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S. M., & Pandhi, N. A. (1999) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1101_4 · Cited by 177
Wang, E., Chou, H.-W., & Jiang, J. J. (2004) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.09.003 · Cited by 176
Social identity, self-categorization, and leadership: A field study of small interactive groups.
Fielding, K. S., & Hogg, M. A. (1997) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.1.39 · Cited by 175
TEAM MEMBER PROXIMITY AND TEAMWORK IN INNOVATIVE PROJECTS.
Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2004.13857778 · Cited by 176
Training People to Work in Groups
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47144-2_3 · Cited by 177
Watson, W. E., Stewart, W. H., & BarNir, A. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(01)00082-9 · Cited by 170
Testing Three Team Training Strategies in Intact Teams
Eduardo Salas, A., Nichols, D. R., & Driskell, J. E. (2007) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407304332 · Cited by 169
THE IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON WORK TEAM COHESIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE
Rapisarda, B. (2002) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028958 · Cited by 166
Impact of Nursing Unit Turnover on Patient Outcomes in Hospitals
Bae, S., Mark, B. A., & Fried, B. J. (2009) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01319.x · Cited by 181
The Maintenance of Masculinity Among the Stakeholders of Sport
Anderson, E. (2009) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2008.09.003 · Cited by 164
Errors in the Heat of Battle: Taking a Closer Look at Shared Cognition Breakdowns Through Teamwork
Wilson, K. A., Salas, E., Priest, H. A., & Andrews, D. H. (2007) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872007x312478 · Cited by 163
Watson, W. E., Johnson, L., & Zgourides, G. D. (2002) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/s0147-1767(01)00032-3 · Cited by 162
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.185 · Cited by 161
Serban, A., & Roberts, A. J. B. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.009 · Cited by 173
Unit-Level OCB and Unit Effectiveness: Examining the Incremental Effect of Helping Behavior
Ehrhart, M. G., Bliese, P. D., & Thomas, J. L. (2006) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1902_4 · Cited by 156
Does Social Cohesion Determine Motivation in Combat?
MacCoun, R. J., Kier, E., & Belkin, A. (2006) · Armed Forces & Society · doi:10.1177/0095327x05279181 · Cited by 153
Chang, Y.-H., & Mosleh, A. (2006) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.010 · Cited by 153
Nielsen, T. M., Bachrach, D. G., Sundstrom, E. D., & Halfhill, T. R. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309356326 · Cited by 170
Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance
Gordon, I., Gilboa, A., Cohen, S., Milstein, N., Haimovich, N., Pinhasi, S., & Siegman, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65670-1 · Cited by 146
A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis
Groth, K. M., & Mosleh, A. (2012) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2012.08.006 · Cited by 151
Performance Implications of Peer Monitoring
Loughry, M. L., & Tosi, H. L. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0356 · Cited by 149
The effect of law enforcement stress on organizational commitment
Jaramillo, F., Nixon, R., & Sams, D. (2005) · Policing An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13639510510597933 · Cited by 148
Relational factors in owner–contractor collaboration: The mediating role of teamworking
Suprapto, M., Bakker, H. L. M., & Mooi, H. G. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.015 · Cited by 157
Dumas, T., Phillips, K., & Rothbard, N. (2013) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0808 · Cited by 135
Griffith, J. E. (2002) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1403_3 · Cited by 156
Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making
Mullen, B. D., Anthony, T., Eduardo Salas, A., & Driskell, J. E. (1994) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496494252003 · Cited by 146
Self-citationRole Ambiguity, Task Cohesion, and Task Self-Efficacy
Eys, M., & Carron, A. V. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200305 · Cited by 143
Dalal, S. R., Khodyakov, D., Srinivasan, R., Straus, S. G., & Adams, J. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.021 · Cited by 138
Factors Influencing Small-Unit Cohesion in Norwegian Navy Officer Cadets
Bartone, P. T., Johnsen, B. H., Eid, J., Brun, W., & Laberg, J. C. (2002) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1401_01 · Cited by 141
Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, P. (2006) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20092 · Cited by 141
The Structure of Group Cohesion
Cota, A. A., Evans, C. R., Dion, K. L., Kilik, L. A., & Longman, R. S. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295216003 · Cited by 140
The role of leaders in shaping formal team norms
Taggar, S., & Ellis, R. J. (2007) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.002 · Cited by 140
Mutonyi, B. R., Slåtten, T., & Lien, G. (2020) · International Journal of Public Leadership · doi:10.1108/ijpl-07-2019-0045 · Cited by 164
Post, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2031 · Cited by 163
Nazir, O., & Islam, J. U. (2017) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-04-2016-0036 · Cited by 230
Reid, C. L., Stewart, E., & Thorne, G. (2004) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.18.2.204 · Cited by 134
Grossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211041157 · Cited by 133
Can a team have too much cohesion? The dark side to network density
Wise, S. E. (2014) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.005 · Cited by 133
The role of team behavioral integration and cohesion in shaping individual improvisation
Magni, M., Proserpio, L., Hoegl, M., & Provera, B. (2009) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.03.004 · Cited by 134
Benefits of immersive collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality
de Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., Nguyen, P., & Louwerse, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00228-9 · Cited by 133
Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches.
Johnson, B. T., Mullen, B. R., & Eduardo Salas, A. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.94 · Cited by 133
Self-citationvan Woerkom, M., & Sanders, K. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9136-y · Cited by 139
Crisis Decisionmaking : A Cognitive-Institutional Approach
STERN, E. K. (1999) · Cited by 131
Group identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kafati, G. (2004) · Advances in Group Processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(00)17002-x · Cited by 130
Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2003) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.08.001 · Cited by 138
Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14451 · Cited by 130
Gardner, D. E., Shields, D. L., Bredemeier, B. J., & Bostrom, A. (1996) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.10.4.367 · Cited by 129
Uddin, M. A., Mahmood, M., & Fan, L. (2019) · Team Performance Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/tpm-12-2017-0078 · Cited by 129
Emergent States in Virtual Teams: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective
Curșeu, P. L. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000077 · Cited by 130
Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment?
Wech, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Steel, R. P., & Bennett, N. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498294004 · Cited by 144
Teams in extreme environments: Alterations in team development and teamwork
Driskell, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.002 · Cited by 144
Van‐Yperen, N. W., & Duda, J. L. (1999) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1999.tb00257.x · Cited by 126
Transformational Leadership, Cohesion Perceptions, and Employee Cynicism About Organizational Change
Wu, C., Neubert, M. J., & Yi, X. (2007) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886307302097 · Cited by 126
Exploring and mitigating social loafing in online communities
Shiue, Y., Chiu, C., & Chang, C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.014 · Cited by 135
Extending Construal-Level Theory to Distributed Groups: Understanding the Effects of Virtuality
Wilson, J. M., Crisp, C. B., & Mortensen, M. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0750 · Cited by 127
Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Motivational Climate Observation System
Smith, N., Tessier, D. P., Tzioumakis, Y. S., Quested, E., Appleton, P. R., Sarrazin, P. G., Papaioannou, A. G., & Duda, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2014-0059 · Cited by 153
The Big Five Personality Traits and Individual Satisfaction With the Team
Peeters, M. A. G., Rutte, C. G., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., & Reymen, I. M. M. J. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405285458 · Cited by 124
Is Group Cohesiveness a Double-Edged Sword?
Langfred, C. W. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498291005 · Cited by 124
Baumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E., & Vohs, K. D. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000618 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullen, B., & Copper, C.
- Affiliations
- Syracuse University (US)
- ORCID
- Mullen, Brian
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-227
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1980511580
- Cited by
- 1,398
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 30.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Keywords
- group cohesion, group performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review