The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of the Presence of Others on Food Intake: A Normative Interpretation.
Abstract
The authors review the effect of the presence of others on food intake. In social facilitation studies, people tend to eat more in groups than when alone. In modeling studies, the presence of others may facilitate or inhibit intake, depending on how much these other people eat. Studies of impression management demonstrate that people tend to eat less in the presence of others than when alone. The authors attempt to reconcile these divergent literatures by reference to a model of inhibitory norms that govern eating. In the presence of palatable food, and in the absence of clear signals of satiety, people look outward to cues from the environment to determine when to stop eating. Socially derived inhibitory norms can account for either increased or decreased intake in the presence of others, depending on how much the others eat and the extent to which one is eager to impress them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046408 · Cited by 4,819
Impression management: A literature review and two-component model.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34 · Cited by 3,334
The psychology of social impact
Latané, B. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.4.343 · Cited by 2,864
Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women
Rolls, B. J., Morris, E. L., & Roe, L. S. (2002) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1207 · Cited by 793
The amount eaten in meals by humans is a power function of the number of people present
de Castro, J. M., & Brewer, E. M. (1992) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(92)90212-k · Cited by 335
Cited by
The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion
Henrich, J. (2009) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005 · Cited by 693
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Packer, D. J. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307309606 · Cited by 311
The effect of deprivation on food cravings and eating behavior in restrained and unrestrained eaters
Polivy, J., Coleman, J., & Herman, C. P. (2005) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20195 · Cited by 257
Self-citationTelevision watching increases motivated responding for food and energy intake in children
Temple, J. L., Giacomelli, A. M., Kent, K. M., Roemmich, J. N., & Epstein, L. H. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.2.355 · Cited by 259
A Review of Factors Influencing Athletes’ Food Choices
Birkenhead, K. L., & Slater, G. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0372-1 · Cited by 240
Stok, F. M., de Vet, E., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Wit, J. B. F. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1155161 · Cited by 177
Spence, C., Velasco, C., & Knoeferle, K. (2014) · Flavour · doi:10.1186/2044-7248-3-8 · Cited by 175
Recall of recent lunch and its effect on subsequent snack intake
Higgs, S., Williamson, A. C., & Attwood, A. S. (2008) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.02.011 · Cited by 101
The evolutionary psychology of climate change behaviors: Insights and applications
Palomo-Vélez, G., & van Vugt, M. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.006 · Cited by 39
Rousset, S., Schlich, P., Chatonnier, A., Barthomeuf, L., & Droit-Volet, S. (2008) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2007.06.005 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Herman, C. P., Roth, D. A., & Polivy, J.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 873-886
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2056731522
- Cited by
- 716
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
