Perceiving persons and groups.

David L. Hamilton, Steven J. Sherman·1996·Psychological Review

Abstract

This article analyzes the similarities and differences in forming impressions of individuals and in developing conceptions of groups. In both cases, the perceiver develops a mental conception of the target (individual or group) on the basis of available information and uses that information to make judgments about that person or group. However, a review of existing evidence reveals differences in the outcomes of impressions formed of individual and group targets, even when those impressions are based on the very same behavioral information. A model is proposed to account for these differences. The model emphasizes the role of differing expectancies of unity and coherence in individual and group targets, which in turn engage different mechanisms for processing information and making judgments. Implications of the model are discussed.

Cites (8)

  1. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
    Tajfel, Henri, Turner, John C. · 2004 · Political Psychology
  2. From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
    Jones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  3. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.
    Morris, Michael W., Peng, Kaiping · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping.
    Taylor, Shelley E., Fiske, Susan T., Etcoff, Nancy L., Ruderman, Audrey J. · 1978 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification.
    Swann, William B., Pelham, Brett W., Krull, Douglas S. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  6. Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups.
    Ostrom, Thomas M., Sedikides, Constantine · 1992 · Psychological Bulletin
  7. Savings in the relearning of trait information as evidence for spontaneous inference generation
    Carlston, Donal E., Skowronski, John J. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  8. Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments.
    Lingle, John H., Ostrom, Thomas M. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (41)

  1. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.
    Dirks, Kurt T., Ferrin, Donald L. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis
    Palmatier, Robert W., Dant, Rajiv P., Grewal, Dhruv, Evans, Kenneth R. · 2006 · Journal of Marketing
  3. Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
    Pavlou, Paul A., Gefen, David · 2004 · Information Systems Research
  4. A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
    Hogg, Michael A. · 2001 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  5. Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
    Hogg, Michael A., Reid, Scott A. · 2006 · Communication Theory

See all 959

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceiving persons and groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.103.2.336
The paper
Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.103.2.336

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.