Cited by 335Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionPsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups.

Ostrom, Thomas M., Sedikides, Constantine·1992·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Reviews literature relevant to the out-group homogeneity effect. The review assesses whether the effect emerges in both natural- and minimal-group contexts. Data relevant to the out-group homogeneity effects are examined for 3 types of dependent measures. Whereas strong support for the effect is obtained across all measures in natural-group settings, no consistent effect is observed in minimal-group settings. Some theories (need-based motives, salience of self, and generalized homogeneity beliefs) predict the occurrence of the effect in both natural and minimal groups, whereas others (group-specific homogeneity beliefs and information encoding and retrieval) predict the occurrence of the effect only for natural groups. The question of whether conditions exist under which the out-group homogeneity can be produced in the minimal-group setting is addressed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.536

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The misestimation of the extremism of rival groups via stereotypical generalization is accompanied by a tendency to hyperrepresent outgroup homogeneity.

    “The misestimation of the extremism of rival groups via stereotypical generalization is accompanied by a tendency to hyperrepresent outgroup homogeneity (Ostrom & Sedikides, 1992).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1992-11
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
536-552
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1998904405
Cited by
334
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
minimal groups, natural groups, intergroup perception, intergroup attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review