Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.

Asher Koriat, Morris Goldsmith·1996·Psychological Review

Abstract

When people are allowed freedom to volunteer or withhold information, they can enhance the accuracy of their memory reports substantially relative to forced-report performance. A theoretical framework addressing the strategic regulation of memory reporting is put forward that delineates the mediating role of metamemorial monitoring and control processes. Although the enhancement of memory accuracy is generally accompanied by a reduction in memory quantity, experimental and simulation results indicate that both of these effects depend critically on (a) accuracy incentive and (b) monitoring effectiveness. The results are discussed with regard to the contribution of meta-memory processes to memory performance, and a general methodology is proposed that incorporates these processes into the assessment of memory-accuracy and memory-quantity performance.

Cites (12)

  1. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
  2. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
    Tulving, Endel, Thomson, Donald M. · 1973 · Psychological Review
  3. Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1990 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  4. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory
    Loftus, Elizabeth F., Miller, David G., Burns, Helen J. · 1978 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
  5. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence
    Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hoffrage, Ulrich, Kleinbölting, Heinz · 1991 · Psychological Review
  6. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions
    Nelson, Thomas O. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
  7. Subjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
    Tulving, Endel · 1962 · Psychological Review
  8. Point of view in personal memories
    Nigro, Georgia, Neisser, Ulric · 1983 · Cognitive Psychology
  9. What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer.
    Reder, Lynne M., Ritter, Frank E. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
  10. Training for calibration
    Lichtenstein, Sarah, Fischhoff, Baruch · 1980 · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

Show all 12 references

Cited by (47)

  1. The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
    Pintrich, Paul R. · 2000 · Handbook of Self-Regulation
  2. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
    Metcalfe, Janet, Mischel, Walter · 1999 · Psychological Review
  3. Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
    Koriat, Asher · 1997 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  4. THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY
    Schacter, Daniel L., Norman, Kenneth A., Koutstaal, Wilma · 1998 · Annual Review of Psychology
  5. Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
    Cabeza, Roberto, St Jacques, Peggy · 2007 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences

See all 1,065

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.103.3.490
The paper
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.103.3.490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.