Cited by 827Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY

Schacter, Daniel L., Norman, Kenneth A., Koutstaal, Wilma·1998·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

▪ Abstract Numerous empirical and theoretical observations point to the constructive nature of human memory. This paper reviews contemporary research pertaining to two major types of memory distortions that illustrate such constructive processes: (a) false recognition and (b) intrusions and confabulations. A general integrative framework that outlines the types of problems that the human memory system must solve in order to produce mainly accurate representations of past experience is first described. This constructive memory framework (CMF) emphasizes processes that operate at encoding (initially binding distributed features of an episode together as a coherent trace; ensuring sufficient pattern separation of similar episodes) and also at retrieval (formation of a sufficiently focused retrieval description with which to query memory; postretrieval monitoring and verification). The framework is applied to findings from four different areas of research: cognitive studies of young adults, neuropsychological investigations of brain-damaged patients, neuroimaging studies, and studies of cognitive aging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289

Cites

175 of 175 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction states that episodic recollection is usually treated as a reconstructive process rather than a perfect replay.

    “Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process”

    From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Schacter et al., 1998

  • Real memories are reconstructed along very similar lines to the way imagined events are constructed.

    “Given this, it would seem reasonable to propose that real memories are reconstructed along very similar lines to the way imagined events are constructed, dovetailing with the idea that memory is (re)constructive in nature (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007).”

    From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Schacter et al., 1998

  • The notion that scene construction is a key component of episodic memory recall lends further support to constructive theories of episodic memory and the constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system.

    “Moreover, the notion that scene construction is a key component of episodic memory recall lends further support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Barlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”

    From Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory (2007) · cites this paper as Schacter et al., 1998

  • Episodic retrieval involves synchronous reactivation of activation patterns in cortical areas that initially processed elements of the original experience, reconstructing the originally encoded representation.

    “Furthermore, neuroimaging has provided evidence that, for instance, episodic retrieval involves synchronous reactivation of activation patterns in the cortical areas that initially processed the elements of the original experience, thereby reconstructing the originally-encoded representation of the experience (Fuster, 1997;Schacter et al., 1998).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Schacter et al., 1998

  • Cognitive studies have shown that a memory may be missing elements or may contain new information, including schema-relevant or newly encountered information.

    “Since the seminal work of Bartlett (1932), numerous cognitive studies have demonstrated that a memory may be missing elements and/or may contain new information (information that is schema-relevant and/or was newly encountered since the original experience; Schacter, Norman, & Koutstaal, 1998).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Schacter, Norman, & Koutstaal, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
1998-02
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
289-318
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2166245738
Cited by
827
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 33
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 08441)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
constructive memory, memory distortion, false recognition, confabulation, intrusion errors, memory encoding, pattern separation, memory retrieval, episodic memory, brain-damaged patients, cognitive aging, neuroimaging of memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Association, Brain Injuries, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Illusions, Memory, Memory Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review