The DOI matches its Crossref record; 246 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Abstract
Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done by individuals and emphasizes instead the importance of social and cultural influences. The model is an intuitionist model in that it states that moral judgment is generally the result of quick, automatic evaluations (intuitions). The model is more consistent that rationalist models with recent findings in social, cultural, evolutionary, and biological psychology, as well as in anthropology and primatology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, since moral values appear to be deeply-held, stable across time, and resistant to change 11 – 13 , a parallel literature on moral cognition makes a different prediction: insofar as punishment is a method of restoring justice following a moral violation, punitive preferences should be less susceptible to group influence.”
From Crowdsourcing punishment: Individuals reference group preferences to inform their own punitive decisions (2019) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The behaviour of individuals living in communities is regulated by moral norms and values 158-162 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [159]
In the citing paper
“Haidt [26], for example, has argued that quick, automatic processes drive moral judgment while reflective processes play a more ad hoc role.”
From Anthropomorphism in AI: hype and fallacy (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Research from social psychology suggests that when individuals encounter others who use fundamentally different moral philosophies to guide behavior, we tend to judge those others as immoral, rather than simply using a different moral perspective (Haidt, 2001(Haidt, , 2012)).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Haidt, 2001
In the citing paper
“Influential theories in psychology maintain that our moral sense is shaped by the social world (1)”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Most existing research takes a dyadic perspective to study the social transmission of morality; typically, one person (such as a child) is exposed to another's ideas (e.g., parent) through behavior or communication (1,2).”
From Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As noted, other research suggests that moral judgments are often based on moral intuitions or heuristics [1], leading to quick and simple judgments.”
From The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions (2012) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, disgust also affects our moral judgment [38,40,42].”
From Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition (2015) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“This caveat might have contributed to the similar results in the meta-analyses on moral cognition and on ToM (rather than on empathy), given that emotion processing is thought to play a paramount role in real-world moral cognition (Krebs 2008; Tangney et al. 2007; Haidt 2001).”
From Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy (2012) · cites this paper as Haidt 2001
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,850
Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things
Lakoff, G. P. (1987) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 · Cited by 13,358
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 7×
“To say that moral reasoning is a conscious process means that the process is intentional, effortful, and controllable and that the reasoner is aware that it is going on (Bargh, 1994).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Black, 1998, Neuronal plasticity and the developing brain., 31
- Chen, 1999, The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context., 73
- D'Andrade, 1984, Cultural meaning systems., 88
- Darwin, 1998, The descent of man.
- de Waal, 1982, Chimpanzee politics.
- Frijda, 1986, The emotions.
- Hare, 1993, Without conscience.
- Harrison, 1967, Ethical objectivism., Vols. 3-4, 71
- Huttenlocher, 1994, Synaptogenesis, synapse elimination, and neural plasticity in human cerebral cortex., Vol. 27, 35
- Kagan, 1984, The nature of the child.
- Kant, 1959, Foundation of the metaphysics of morals (L. W. Beck. Trans.).
- Kohlberg, 1969, Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization., 347
- Lapsley, 1996, Moral psychology.
- Margolis, 1987, Patterns, thinking, and cognition.
- Mednick, 1982, Biology and violence., 21
- Mischel, 1976, A cognitive social-learning approach to morality and self-regulation., 84
- Newcomb, 1943, Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community.
- Pavlov, 1927, Conditioned reflexes.
- Perkins, 1983, Difficulties in everyday reasoning., 177
- Premack, 1995, Origins of human social competence., 205
- Rozin, 2000, Disgust., 637
- Shweder, 1997, The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the "big three" explanations of suffering., 119
- Singer, 1994, Rethinking life and death.
- Solomon, 1993, The philosophy of emotions., 3
- Solomon, 1991, A terror management theory of social behavior., 93
- Williams, 1967, Rationalism., Vols. 7-8, 69
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 8,601–8,700 of 8,792
Frisari, F. V., Kosić, A., & Vecchione, M. (2026) · Psychology Hub · doi:10.13133/2724-2943/19059
Bonicalzi, S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70581-6_289-1
Zhang, B., Jia, S., Jiang, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941261473834
The Rise of the Ethical Consumer
Stiefenhofer, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22336-4_2
Hiskes, B., Hicks, M., & Breithaupt, F. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7216700
Navigating codified, tacit and novel rules: Mapping the human-AI creativity frontier
Walkowiak, E. (2026) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103660
Ma, F. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107539
Sociological rational choice theory: retrospect and prospect
Kiser, E. V., Pfaff, S. J., & Robbins, B. G. (2026) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-026-01430-5
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0007
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0004
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0002
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0003
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0001
The Justification of Deduction
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0005
Smithies, D. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197849507.003.0006
The Limits of Rational Choice: Reimagining Homo Economicus
Fr Kuruvilla Pandikattu, S. J. (2026) · Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24727-8_3
Mattavelli, S., & Effron, D. A. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104990
Moral Judgment as an Intellectual Capability in AI SystemsPreprint
Wall, L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7207421
Kloostra, L., Beulen, M. A., Berkum, J. J. A. V., & Struiksma, M. E. (2026) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01464-8
Exploration of EEG activity corresponding to the functional expansion theory of disgust
Wang, D., & Iwaki, T. (2026) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2026.113451
Advancing AI , Virtue Enhancement, and the Need for Niebuhrian Virtues of Moral Vigilance
Peterson, G. R. (2026) · Journal of Religious Ethics · doi:10.1111/jore.70029
Nerantzaki, K., Metallidou, P., Efklides, A., Kiosseoglou, G., & Vaiopoulou, J. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-09872-2
Can arguments save armchair philosophy?
Wu, S. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05766-9
Developmental and Ethical Framework for the Responsible Use of Cognitive CapacityPreprint
Smith, K. A. L. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7249179
Ethical decision-making under stress: the role of the nonreactive facet of mindfulness
Hanson, S. K., Hollingworth, D., & Valentine, S. R. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1879880
The Care Disconnection Framework
Respess, S., & Counted, V. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29101-1_2
Teaching Sustainability Across Politically Diverse Classrooms: Patterns of Interpretive Convergence
Lunde, M. B., & Sepúlveda, C. A. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/02734753261464646
Qin, X., Yu, W., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-04-2026-0537
Together: Trusting Others and Conversation in Dark Times
Filho, W. J. S., & Dazzani, M. V. M. (2026) · Theory and history in the human and social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26797-9_3
Bezerra, E., & Freire, F. D. S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7293005
How naming shared values is an effective approach to leading through a crisis
Rutherford, M. D. (2026) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/aam.np64j49fm
Maria Ossowska and the Science of Morality: A Forgotten Giant of Experimental Moral Philosophy?
Ulatowski, J. W. (2026) · Studies in history and philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-34008-5_11
Bridges and barriers for insect-based food among young adult Italian consumers
Fratta, I. L., Padulo, C., Capotosto, P., Falasca, N. W., Puleo, S., Monaco, R. D., & Franciotti, R. (2026) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2026.101161
Life is a Pressure Cooker: How and Why Stress Directs Consumers to Act Unethically
Tran, H.-A., Golossenko, A., Johnson, S. G. B., Khamitov, M., & Huang, J. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06449-8
A recognition-based framework for human–robot relationships
Hoshino, J. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100382
Tang, Y., Xu, W., Chen, S., & Yang, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1902943
Losing sight of the threat: police, risk, and artificial intelligence
Heffren, C. D. J., Ferguson, L., & Huey, L. (2026) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2026.2716885
Typologies of academic ethical blindness among graduate students
Oğuz, E., Akpolat, T., Kara, S. B. K., & GÜNEŞ, D. Z. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02046-z
“Ban it!”: Moral foundations of preemptive objections to emerging warbot technology
Merritt, S. M., & Tenhundfeld, N. L. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100374
Chang, X. M. (2026) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Moral Rationality and the Formation of Ethical Action: A Study of Aristotle's Thought
Andrizal, Y. (2026) · Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner · doi:10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.1036
Zhou, Q., & Wu, Y. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10024468/v1
A Rhetorical History of Modern Money Theory
Saas, W. O., & Harvey, J. T. (2026) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.2026.2699653
Can bad guys count as happy? The graded moralization of happiness across general and episodic levels
Li, J., Qi, H., Long, J., & Luo, Y. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104996
Maurya, M. K. (2026) · Journal of Dharma Studies · doi:10.1007/s42240-026-00275-x
The Macro-Level Without Metaphysics: Coordination, Emergence, and Downward Causation
Zaynutdinov, B. (n.d.) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
From Medical to Social Exceptionality: Media, Disabled Masculinities, and Integrated Combat Sports
Deng, J., & Lin, Z. (2026) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/21674795261482062
Andrea, G. L. P. (2026) · Universidad Industrial de Santander
From code to conduct: An exploratory study of ethics in environmental consultancy
Abdelwahab, O. (2026) · UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol)
Gamage, D., Nanayakkara, I., & Sasahara, K. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7360004
Constantin, G.-D., Cucui-Cozma, A. S., Veja, I., Mazilescu, C.-A., & Oancea, R. (2026) · Dentistry Journal · doi:10.3390/dj14090537
Simpson, B., Eriksson, K., Vartanova, I., Strimling, P., Tamayo, J. P. M., Abdi, K. A., Ad, N., Aldashev, A., Ali, H. M., Alì, M., et al. (2026) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224261464586
Kim, R. S. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107689
Comparative Desire and Social Violence: Mimetic Structure, Inequity, and the Scapegoat Dynamic
Elden, Å. (2026) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537261481740
Arguments About Artificial Intelligence in Social Work: A Critical Perspective
Hodgson, D. (2026) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2026.2708105
A New Theory of Human Nature: An Eight-Factor Dynamic Model Beyond the Good-Evil DebatePreprint
Hua, G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7365398
Beauvais, N., & Neys, W. D. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107725
Oliveira, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_374-1
Baiocco, S., & Mazzoli, C. (2026) · European Journal of Finance · doi:10.1080/1351847x.2026.2726302
From Is to Ought: Embodied Value Salience, Ought-Feeling, and the Genesis of Normative MotivationPreprint
Hua, G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7380978
清浄プライミングおよび道徳的価値観が道徳的自己へのアクセシビリティに及ぼす影響
浅野, 龍., & 浦, 光. (2026) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.69274/403260303
Funnel framing of moral discussion in China’s Morality and Law classrooms
Wu, X. (2026) · Journal of Moral Education · doi:10.1080/03057240.2026.2713547
Poor, S. V., & Herman, B. C. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00779-9
Mamanazarov, U. (2024) · Research Focus International Scientific Journal · doi:10.66073/researchfocus.v3i9.1013
Jenni, S., & Hopwood, C. J. (2026) · Food and Humanity · doi:10.1016/j.foohum.2026.101591
Optimising feedback provision and literacy in medical training: linking theory to practice
Ng, I. K., Goh, W. G. W., Lin, N. H. Y., Gan, M. Y., Teo, D. B. S., Tan, L. F., Low, Y. L., Aw, M., & Kee, A. C.-L. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1883679
Understanding Heroism: The Role of Social Influence in Shaping PerceptionsPreprint
Sürü, D., & Arslantürk, G. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10534087/v1
To Revise or to Rationalize: Cognitive Mechanisms of Moral Inconsistency ResolutionPreprint
Calcott, R., & Cushman, F. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7442634
Turnbull, L. M. M. (2026) · Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University)
Moral-reasoning profiles of Turkish undergraduates: a mixed-methods analysis of ethical vignettes
Göçen, A., Türkoğlu, M. E., Doğmuş, A., Oyebamiji, O. A., & Özkal, E. S. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-026-10036-5
Measuring structural value alignment in sixteen models: LLMs have human-like moral spaces
Tang, Y. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01368-w
Nwabuatu, E. N. (2026) · WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT STUDIES · doi:10.56201/wjeds.v11.no2.2026pg164.175
The Unintended Effects of Ethical Decision Aids in OrganizationsPreprint
Baader, M., Egorov, M., Renerte, B., Tanner, C., Wagner, A. F., & Witt, N. (2025) · doi:10.67929/ecgi-fin-1041-2025
Development and validation of the slander scale: an Islamic, cultural, and psychological framework
Ishaq, G., Adil, A., Adeeb, H., Rafique, R., & Batool, I. (2026) · Mental Health Religion & Culture · doi:10.1080/13674676.2026.2635732
Shahzad, S. R. (n.d.) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Si, W., Chen, P., Cao, J., Zhong, Y., & Lei, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1912571
Religious Authority and Political Compromise: Evidence from Religious Leaders in Israel
Freedman, M., & Bloom, P. B. (2019) · Politics and Religion · doi:10.1017/s1755048326100480
Liu, C.-J., Han, S., & Hao, F. (2026) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2026.2733007
Why Some Suffer More: Moral Distress in Adverse Work Environments
Kirejeva, O., & Perminas, A. (2026) · Ethics and Social Welfare · doi:10.1080/17496535.2026.2722389
Developing K-12 teachers’ ethical competencies through cognitive dissonance of gameplay
Ma, M., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. W. (2026) · Proceedings. · doi:10.22318/icls2026.687874
프로스포츠 불법도박 사건에서의 준사회적 관계, 비윤리성 지각, 지각된 심각성, 재관람의도의 구조적 관계
김, 희., 전, 다., & 한, 진. (2026) · 한국체육학회지 · doi:10.23949/kjpe.2026.7.65.4.38
Miranda-Rodríguez, R. A. (2026) · Persona · doi:10.26439/persona2026.n1.8765
Taufik, T., Sumaryati, S., & Hidayati, D. (2026) · Journal of Insan Mulia education · doi:10.59923/joinme.v4i1.961
Simulated Morality, Misplaced Trust: The Risks of Treating AI as a Moral Partner
Josifović, S. (2026) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-026-01180-8
Nicholls, J. Q., Jones, A., Maynard, O., Askew, R., Montgomery, C., Holland, A., & Sumnall, H. R. (2026) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/00914509261488595
The Irony of Free Will: the Cultural Evolution of a Confusing Concept
Blancke, S., & Sie, M. (2026) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-bja10002
Jones, E. (2026) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003590057
Rezaei, S. S., & Arianpoor, A. (2026) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-10-2025-0725
Heuristics and biases in charity and voting
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0007
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0006
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0012
General psychological biases as counter-norms
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0003
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0011
Self-interest vs. altruistic motivation
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0005
Moralism, paternalism, manipulation, freedom
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0010
Baron, J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197847404.003.0013
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidt, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Haidt, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Haidt, Jonathan
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 814-834
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2123791568
- Semantic Scholar
- b74e8da297574fd071d4b48b7aa94ea16861aea6
- Cited by
- 8,048
- References
- 254
- Citations by year
- 2026: 365 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 447 · 2022: 497 · 2021: 468 · 2020: 535 · 2019: 511 · 2018: 405 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 408 · 2015: 416 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 433 · 2012: 369
- FWCI
- 16.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03da012606-01)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (1-RO3-DA12606-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- moral judgment, moral reasoning, social intuitionism, moral intuitions, automated assessment, evolutionary psychology of morality
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Morals, Problem Solving, Social Perception, Social Values, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review