Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996).
Abstract
M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter's (1992) capacity theory of comprehension posits a linguistic working memory functionally separated from the representation of linguistic knowledge. G. S. Waters and D. Caplan's (1996) critique of this approach retained the notion of a separate working memory. In this article, the authors present an alternative account motivated by a connectionist approach to language comprehension. In their view, processing capacity emerges from network architecture and experience and is not a primitive that can vary independently. Individual differences in comprehension do not stem from variations in a separate working memory capacity; instead they emerge from an interaction of biological factors and language experience. This alternative is argued to provide a superior account of comprehension results previously attributed to a separate working memory capacity.
Cites (10)
- ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAXChomsky, Noam · 1964
- The Modularity of MindFodor, Jerry A. · 1983
- The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognitionSalthouse, Timothy A. · 1996 · Psychological Review
- A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memoryJust, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Long-term working memory.Ericsson, K. Anders, Kintsch, Walter · 1995 · Psychological Review
- The phonological loop as a language learning device.Baddeley, Alan, Gathercole, Susan, Papagno, Costanza · 1998 · Psychological Review
- A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and readingvan Orden, Guy C. · 1987 · Memory & Cognition
- INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPANCONRAD, R., HULL, A. J. · 1964 · British Journal of Psychology
- Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Engle, Randall W., Cantor, Judy, Carullo, Julie J. · 1992 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Age and working memory: the role of perceptual speed, the central executive, and the phonological loopFisk, John E., Warr, Peter · 1996 · Psychology and Aging
Cited by (19)
- The Generality of Working Memory Capacity: A Latent-Variable Approach to Verbal and Visuospatial Memory Span and Reasoning.Kane, Michael J., Hambrick, David Z., Tuholski, Stephen W., Wilhelm, Oliver, Payne, Tabitha W., Engle, Randall W. · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expertCastles, Anne, Rastle, Kathleen, Nation, Kate · 2018 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When: An Experience-Sampling Study of Working Memory and Executive Control in Daily LifeKane, Michael J., Brown, Leslie H., McVay, Jennifer C., Silvia, Paul J., Myin-Germeys, Inez, Kwapil, Thomas R. · 2007 · Psychological Science
- The concurrent validity of the N -back task as a working memory measureJaeggi, Susanne M., Buschkuehl, Martin, Perrig, Walter J., Meier, Beat · 2010 · Memory
- Becoming syntacticChang, Franklin, Dell, Gary S., Bock, Kathryn · 2006 · Psychological Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-295x.109.1.35
- The paper
- MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.109.1.35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.