The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SUSTAIN: A Network Model of Category Learning.
Abstract
SUSTAIN (Supervised and Unsupervised STratified Adaptive Incremental Network) is a model of how humans learn categories from examples. SUSTAIN initially assumes a simple category structure. If simple solutions prove inadequate and SUSTAIN is confronted with a surprising event (e.g., it is told that a bat is a mammal instead of a bird), SUSTAIN recruits an additional cluster to represent the surprising event. Newly recruited clusters are available to explain future events and can themselves evolve into prototypes-attractors-rules. SUSTAIN's discovery of category substructure is affected not only by the structure of the world but by the nature of the learning task and the learner's goals. SUSTAIN successfully extends category learning models to studies of inference learning, unsupervised learning, category construction, and contexts in which identification learning is faster than classification learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
WIDROW, B., & HOFF, M. E. (1960) · doi:10.21236/ad0241531 · Cited by 4,009
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578 · cited 2×
“Geman, Bienenstock, and Doursat (1992) termed this tradeoff between data fitting and generalization as the bias–variance dilemma.In brief, when a model is too simple, it is overly biased and cannot learn the correct boundaries.”
BackgroundToward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
Context theory of classification learning
Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207 · Cited by 3,061
Self-citationA massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine
Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1987) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80014-2 · Cited by 2,525
Cited by
Evaluating amazon’s mechanical turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research
Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 · Cited by 1,617
Representation in Cognitive Science
Shea, N. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198812883.001.0001 · Cited by 676
Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: an integrative framework
Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033625 · Cited by 446
A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning
Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1080/03640210701802071 · Cited by 469
Cognitive control over learning: Creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure.
Collins, A. G. E., & Frank, M. J. (2013) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0030852 · Cited by 426
Learning task-state representations
Niv, Y. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0470-8 · Cited by 356
Reinforcement Learning in Multidimensional Environments Relies on Attention Mechanisms
Niv, Y., Daniel, R., Geana, A., Gershman, S. J., Leong, Y. C., Radulescu, A., & Wilson, R. C. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2978-14.2015 · Cited by 362
On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends
Barsalou, L. W. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3 · Cited by 331
Dynamic updating of hippocampal object representations reflects new conceptual knowledge
Mack, M. L., Love, B. C., & Preston, A. R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614048113 · Cited by 223
Self-citationCarvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0371-0 · Cited by 175
Measuring neural representations with fMRI: practices and pitfalls
Davis, T., & Poldrack, R. A. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12156 · Cited by 132
Statistical computations underlying the dynamics of memory updating
Gershman, S. J., Radulescu, A., Norman, K. A., & Niv, Y. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003939 · Cited by 101
The Algorithmic Level Is the Bridge Between Computation and Brain
Love, B. C. (2015) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12131 · Cited by 82
Self-citationCategories, Concepts, and Conceptual Development
Sloutsky, V. M., & Deng, W. (. (2019) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1391398 · Cited by 77
Radulescu, A., Shin, Y. S., & Niv, Y. (2021) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-092920-120559 · Cited by 63
Toward a dual-learning systems model of speech category learning.
Chandrasekaran, B., Koslov, S. R., & Maddox, W. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00825 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-332
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2170014483
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 34.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
