The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attention gating in short-term visual memory.
Abstract
Subjects first detected a target embedded in a stream of letters presented at the left of fixation and then, as quickly as possible, shifted their attention to a stream of numerals at the right of fixation. They attempted to report, in order, the four earliest occurring numerals after the target. Numerals appeared at rates of 4.6,6.9,9.2, and 13.4/s. Scaling analyses were made of (a) item scores, P,(r), the probability of a numeral from stimulus position i appearing in response position r,r = (l,2,3, 4), and (b) order scores, PiBj, the probability that a numeral from stimulus position / ' appeared earlier in the response than one from stimulus position;'. For all subjects, targets, and numeral rates, the relative position of numerals in the response sequence showed clustering, disorder, and folding. Reported numerals tended to cluster around a stimulus position 400 ms after the target. The numerals were reported in an apparently haphazard order—at high numeral rates, inverted iBj pairs were as frequent as correct pairs. The actual order of report resulted from a mixture of correctly ordered numerals with numerals ordered in the direction opposite to their order of presentation (folding around the cluster center). These results are quantitatively described by a strength theory of order (precedence) and are efficiently predicted by a computational attention gating model (AGM). The AGM makes quantitatively correct predictions of over 500 values ofPt(r), PIBj in 12 conditions with two attention
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Iconic memory needs to be refreshed every 200 ms (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
From On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action (1994) · cites this paper as Reeves & Sperling, 1986
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 3×
“Using a cost-benefit paradigm (reviewed in Posner, 1980), Shulman, Remington, and McLean (1979) found that a valid cue presented 150 ms or more before a target speeded reaction time more than did an invalid cue and argued that attention could shift over the visual field without eye movements.”
MethodShiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Egeth, H. E., & Kahneman, D. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,976
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
A law of comparative judgment.
Thurstone, L. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0070288 · Cited by 5,077
Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears
Cherry, E. C. (1953) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907229 · Cited by 4,774
Lane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Self-citationAttention and the detection of signals.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160 · Cited by 3,778
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 424
Bachmann, T. (1988) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(88)90041-7 · Cited by 71
“…retouch theory seems compatible with the psychophysical proactive contrast enhancement effect as well as with some other similar forward facilitation effects found in the area of visual attention research (Sokolov, 1963; Eriksen and St James, 1986; Possamai, 1986; Reeves and Sperling, 1986).”
The speed of visual attention: What time is it?
Carlson, T. A., Hogendoorn, H., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2006) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/6.12.6 · Cited by 70
“Reeves and Sperling (1986), and later Weichselgartner and Sperling (1987) used the attentional gating paradigm to measure the speed of visual attention.”
BackgroundMethodStatistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources.
Umemoto, A., Scolari, M., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0019324 · Cited by 70
Astle, D. E., Nobre, A. C., & Scerif, G. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.492622 · Cited by 68
“Although this original experiment was not designed with spatial attentional orienting effects in mind, benefits suggested that information in iconic memory can be successfully selected on the bases of attentional cues and biased for efficient recall (Reeves & Sperling, 1986 ).”
Epistemological challenges for connectionism
McCarthy, J. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0005264x · Cited by 68
Luo, C. R., & Caramazza, A. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.22.1.95 · Cited by 68
“This is not merely a theoretical possibility but an empirically justified one because letter migration errors are common in RSVP (e.g., Reeves & Sperling, 1986) as well as BSVP (e.g., Mozer, 1983).”
BackgroundMeasuring and modeling the trajectory of visual spatial attention.
Shih, S.-I., & Sperling, G. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.2.260 · Cited by 65
“When the observer has to shift attention spatially from the target location to the location of the to-bereported stream, the most frequently reported item occurs about 300 to 400 ms after the target onset (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationIs conscious perception a series of discrete temporal frames?
White, P. A. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.02.012 · Cited by 70
Zivony, A., & Lamy, D. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01973-2 · Cited by 72
“Accordingly, we consider perceptual processing as a process of evidence accumulation, during which activation of sensory representations is continuously strengthened (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
MethodVerleger, R., Sprenger, A., Gebauer, S., Fritzmannova, M., Friedrich, M., Kraft, S., & Jaśkowskí, P. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21038 · Cited by 63
“known to be a relatively slow process since the studies by Reeves and Sperling (1986) and Sperling and Reeves”
BackgroundDoes Attention Have Different Effects on Line Orientation and Line Arrangement Discrimination?
Cheal, M., Lyon, D. R., & Hubbard, D. C. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749108400959 · Cited by 62
Woolf, N. J. (1996) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(96)00163-7 · Cited by 62
“When visual information is scanned very quickly, subjects can later recall information limited to the 200–500 ms following stimulus presentation.(205) Subjects remember little, if any, of this information a short time later.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe attention cascade model and attentional blink
Shih, S.-I. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.06.001 · Cited by 60
“The attention cascade model uses an architecture similar to those seen in cognitive accounts of AB and employs computational details from theories of attention gating (Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Shih & Sperling, 2002; Sperling & Weichselgartner , 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTemporal Allocation of Visual Attention in Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Hollingsworth, D. E., McAuliffe, S. P., & Knowlton, B. J. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290151137359 · Cited by 61
A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain.
Botella, J., Barriopedro, M. I., & Suero, M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.6.1452 · Cited by 58
Olivers, C. N. L. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00466.x · Cited by 58
“For example, Reeves and Sperling (1986) used a task similar to the attentional blink task but with two simultaneous streams, one consisting of letters, the other consisting of digits.”
BackgroundMethodTuning of orientation detectors in human vision
Ringach, D. L. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00322-2 · Cited by 56
Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality
Krumbholz, K., Nobis, E. A., Weatheritt, R. J., & Fink, G. R. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20615 · Cited by 55
“…with spatial shifts of auditory or visual attention was measured using a modified version of the rapid serial presentation task devised by Yantis et al. [2002; see Reeves and Sperling 1986, for the original perceptual version of the task] and its auditory equivalent [Shomstein and Yantis, 2006].”
MethodA Functional and Cognitive Analysis of Infant Long-Term Retention
Rovee‐Collier, C., & Shyi, C.-W. G. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2868-4_1 · Cited by 55
Block, R. A. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.5.667 · Cited by 54
Shih, S.-I. (2000) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212137 · Cited by 54
Maddox, W. T., Filoteo, J. V., Delis, D. C., & Salmon, D. P. (1996) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.10.2.197 · Cited by 53
Shifts in spatial attention affect the perceived duration of events
Cicchini, G. M., & Morrone, M. C. (2009) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/9.1.9 · Cited by 52
Dissociations between reaction times and temporal order judgments: A diffusion model approach.
Miller, J. O., & Schwarz, W. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.394 · Cited by 56
A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation
Clifford, C. W. G., Arnold, D. H., & Pearson, J. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00120-2 · Cited by 52
“The luminance of the red grating modulated between 16.1 and 53.7 cd/m2 and the luminance of the green grating between 16.7 and 52.7 cd/m2.”
BackgroundInfluentialGetting beyond the serial/parallel debate in visual search: a hybrid approach
Moore, C. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198505150.003.0009 · Cited by 50
Attentional blink in adolescents with varying levels of impulsivity
Li, C.-S. R., Chen, S., Lin, W., & Yang, Y. (2004) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.06.003 · Cited by 50
“…to explore the temporal characteristics of information processing (Broadbent and Broadbent, 1987; Chun and Potter, 1995; Raymond et al., 1992; Reeves and Sperling, 1986; Shapiro et al., 1994; Ward and Duncan, 1996; Weichselgartner and Sperling, 1987; see also Shapiro et al., 1997 for a…”
BackgroundWoolf, N. J. (1997) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1006/ccog.1997.0319 · Cited by 50
“For example, studies of short-term memory show that stimuli presented 200–700 msec after a target stimulus have the best chance of being remembered (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundSmolensky, semantics, and the sensorimotor system
Lakoff, G. P. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00052596 · Cited by 50
Jimenez, A. M., Lee, J., Wynn, J. K., Cohen, M. S., Engel, S. A., Glahn, D. C., Nuechterlein, K. H., Reavis, E. A., & Green, M. F. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00323 · Cited by 48
“In an RSVP task, a series of similar items (e.g., letters) are displayed rapidly in the same spatial location (Reeves and Sperling, 1986; Shapiro, 1994; Chun and Potter, 1995).”
BackgroundPerceptual identification of contextual attributes and infant memory retrieval.
Rovee‐Collier, C., Schechter, A., Shyi, G. C. ‐., & Shields, P. J. (1992) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037//0012-1649.28.2.307 · Cited by 49
Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade
Horowitz, T. S., Holcombe, A. O., Wolfe, J. M., Arsenio, H. C., & DiMase, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.7.6 · Cited by 49
“Hence, it is unsurprising that using shift cues which take longer to interpret results in longer estimates of shift times (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundMethodFour-dot masking produces the attentional blink
Dell’Acqua, R., Pascali, A., Jolicœur, P., & Sessa, P. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00308-0 · Cited by 49
Attentional release in the saccadic gap effect
Jin, Z., & Reeves, A. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.015 · Cited by 48
“This time-course is consistent with that of a covert shift of attention (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
Self-citationNeural dynamics of grouping and segmentation explain properties of visual crowding.
Francis, G., Manassi, M., & Herzog, M. H. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000070 · Cited by 50
“At a conceptual level, this selection process functions similar to the hypothesized attentional gate that is common to many theories of visual perception (e.g., Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundLong-lasting, long-range detection facilitation
Tanaka, Y., & Sagi, D. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00465-3 · Cited by 47
“Presumably a dynamic attention process, similar to the ‘shut-andlock’ mechanism in detection [35,36] takes place at around a 300 ms delay, establishing a persisting memory trace.”
Attention and the role of dual codes in phoneme monitoring
Eimas, P. D., Hornstein, S. B. M., & Payton, P. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90070-g · Cited by 47
Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention
White, A. L., Rolfs, M., & Carrasco, M. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.14.7 · Cited by 46
Horowitz, T. S., Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Cohen, M. A., & Kuzmova, Y. I. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210902732155 · Cited by 44
Jiang, Y. V., & Chun, M. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.3.664 · Cited by 45
“Yet it may take some time to switch attention to different locations (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundAttention et jugement temporel
Zakay, D. (2004) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2004.10.004 · Cited by 44
Filtering versus parallel processing in RSVP tasks
Botella, J., & Eriksen, C. W. (1992) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211627 · Cited by 42
Li, C. R., Lin, W., Chang, H., & Hung, Y.-W. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.2.228 · Cited by 43
“We used rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigms, which have been used extensively in the literature to explore the temporal characteristics of information processing (Broadbent & Broadbent, 1987; Chun & Potter, 1995; Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992; Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Shapiro, Raymond, & Arnell, 1994;…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCategorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal visual attention.
Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Potter, M. C. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0013903 · Cited by 45
“This is in contrast to earlier studies, (e.g., Weichselgartner & Sperling, 1987; Duncan, Ward, & Shapiro, 1994; and Reeves & Sperling, 1986 ) in which the subject encodes a first target before attention is diverted to another location, resulting in a prolonged attentional dwell time of up to several hundred millisecon…”
InfluentialUsing a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention
Palmer, J. C., & Moore, C. M. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.022 · Cited by 45
“Such gain models have been developed extensively in the work of Sperling and colleagues (e.g., Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Sperling & Weichselgartner, 1995) and have recently been extended using linear systems theory (Blaser, Sperling, & Lu, 1999; Gobell, Tseng, & Sperling, 2004) and the analysis of external noise (Doshe…”
MethodAutomatic Influences as Accessibility Bias in Memory and Stroop Tasks: Toward a Formal Model
Jacoby, L. L., Brian Mcelree, A., & Trainham, T. N. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1480.003.0024 · Cited by 41
Bradski, G. R., Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1991) · OpenBU (Boston University) · Cited by 41
Evidence for Distinct Attentional Bottlenecks in Attention Switching and Attentional Blink Tasks
Peterson, M. S., & Juola, J. F. (2000) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221300009598568 · Cited by 40
Object file continuity predicts attentional blink magnitude
Fj, K., & Shapiro, K. L. (2004) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194912 · Cited by 40
“... position of subsequent targets in relation to T1. With this paradigm, despite use of a diverse range of stimuli and response formats, the behavioral outcome is now well documented: Presenting T2 in close temporal proximity to T1 has a deleterious effect on participants’ ability to carry out the T2 task for targets…”
BackgroundOn the proper treatment of Smolensky
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00052511 · Cited by 40
Visual temporal attention from perception to computation
Denison, R. N. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00294-0 · Cited by 40
“An early model of reactive dynamic attention is the attention gating model 45,191,192 .”
Shifts of visual spatial attention modulate a steady-state visual evoked potential
Belmonte, M. K. (1998) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00007-x · Cited by 39
Caldwell‐Harris, C. L., & Morris, A. L. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.004 · Cited by 38
“Everyday observation leads us to expect that the order in which we perceive events is the order in which they occur (Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
Somers, D. C., & Sheremata, S. (2013) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1230 · Cited by 41
Zakay, D. (2000) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00086-3 · Cited by 37
The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: A signal detection model
Santhi, N., & Reeves, A. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.011 · Cited by 38
“, search for red among pink distractors is faster than for pink among red) appear to violate any distance metric, but Rosenholtz (2001b) showed that the appearance of asymmetry disappears when the background is taken into account.”
Self-citationM�sseler, J., & Neumann, O. (1992) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/bf01358263 · Cited by 38
Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time
Petersen, A., Kyllingsbæk, S., & Bundesen, C. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0286-y · Cited by 37
“Sperling and Weichselgartner (1995; see also Weichselgartner & Sperling, 1987) extended the AGM of Reeves and Sperling (1986) into an episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention (ETDSA), which describes the time course of visual attention as a sequence of discrete attentional episodes.”
BackgroundInfluentialLinares, D., & Holcombe, A. O. (2014) · i-Perception · doi:10.1068/i0675 · Cited by 46
“Indeed, it is possible that this bias is the major contribution to the prior entry effect (Matthews, Welch, Festa, & Clement, 2013; Reeves & Sperling 1986; Shore et al., 2001; Schneider & Bavelier, 2003; Spence & Parise, 2010).”
BackgroundSymbol-string sensitivity and adult performance in lexical decision
Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Cooper, C., Hansen, P., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2005) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.004 · Cited by 36
“If the two targets are displayed within a critical temporal interval, identification is nearly perfect for the first but is substantially reduced for the second (Broadbent & Broadbent, 1987; Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundA bottom–up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition
Wolfgang Einhäuser, A., Mundhenk, T. N., Baldi, P., Christof Koch, A., & Itti, L. (2007) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/7.10.6 · Cited by 36
Hochberg, J. E. (1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012301160-2/50011-3 · Cited by 38
The Temporal Organization of Perception
Holcombe, A. O. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686858.013.057 · Cited by 35
Prior entry explains order reversals in the attentional blink
Olivers, C. N. L., Hilkenmeier, F., & Scharlau, I. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0004-7 · Cited by 35
Spatial maps for time and motion
Morrone, M. C., Cicchini, G. M., & Burr, D. C. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2334-z · Cited by 34
“We have recently investigated this possibility measuring the apparent separation between two visual stimuli manipulating the subjects' attention with a dual task design (Reeves and Sperling 1986).”
The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial
Lunau, R., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.2.317 · Cited by 34
“The classic work by Sperling and colleagues (Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Sperling & Weichselgartner, 1995; Weich selgartner & Sperling, 1987), using a paradigm very similar to that of the AB, has shown that well-trained observers receiving a cue to switch streams need around 200–250 msec to reach…”
Akyürek, E. G., & Wolff, M. J. (2016) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.009 · Cited by 34
“Some prior evidence for this interaction was presented by Visser and Enns (2001). They assessed how the availability of attentional resources affects temporal integration, using a modified version of the missing element task (MET; e.”
MethodEyetracking in der Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft: Theorie, Methode und kritische Reflexion
Geise, S. (2011) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2011-2-149 · Cited by 34
New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique
Barriopedro, M. I., & Botella, J. (1998) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03208001 · Cited by 33
Prospective timing, attention and the switch
Lejeune, H. (2000) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00136-4 · Cited by 32
How fully should connectionism be activated? Two sources of excitation and one of inhibition
Shepard, R. N. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00052729 · Cited by 33
Split of attentional resources in human visual cortex
Morawetz, C., Holz, P., Baudewig, J., Treue, S., & Dechent, P. (2007) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523807070745 · Cited by 33
“…across locations is ruled out by our experimental design with stimulus durations of 164 ms as previous experiments have demonstrated minimum switching times in the range of 200 to 500 ms ~Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Weichselgartner & Sperling, 1987; Peterson & Juola, 2000; Duncan et al., 1994!.”
MethodStructure and controlling subsymbolic processing
Schneider, W. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00052717 · Cited by 31
Bullet trains and steam engines: Exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along
Chakravarthi, R., & Rufin Vanrullen, A. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.4.12 · Cited by 30
Egner, S., Reimann, S., Höger, R., & Zangemeister, W. H. (2018) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.11.6.4 · Cited by 30
“Selective attention denotes the allocation of limited processing resources to some stimuli or tasks at the expense of others (Dosher, Sperling, & Wurst, 1986; Kowler, Anderson, Dosher, & Blaser, 1995; Norman & Bobrow, 1975; Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Shaw, 1982, 1984).”
BackgroundLateralization of Frequency-Specific Networks for Covert Spatial Attention to Auditory Stimuli
Thorpe, S., D’Zmura, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2011) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-011-0186-x · Cited by 29
“Similar experiments performed using the rapid visual serial presentation (RSVP) paradigm have estimated the time shift for top-down goal-directed attention to lie between 300 and 500 ms (Reeves and Sperling 1986).”
MethodEffects of a Controlled Auditory–Verbal Distraction Task on Older Driver Vehicle Control
Rizzo, M., Stierman, L., Skaar, N. R., Dawson, J. D., Anderson, S. W., & Vecera, S. P. (2004) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/1865-01 · Cited by 30
Information processing abstractions: The message still counts more than the medium
Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A. K., & Allemang, D. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0005247x · Cited by 30
Cued detection with compound integration-interruption masks reveals multiple attentional mechanisms
Smith, P. L., Ellis, R., Sewell, D. K., & Wolfgang, B. J. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.5.3 · Cited by 29
“The orienting model is an elaboration of an earlier model described by Smith, Ratcliff, et al. (2004), which was inspired by the model of Reeves and Sperling (1986).”
MethodModulatory Interactions of Resting-State Brain Functional Connectivity
Di, X., & Biswal, B. B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071163 · Cited by 29
“Taken together, these results may suggest an important role of nonlinear modulation to support attentional gating which selectively processes information from lower to higher visual areas [45].”
BackgroundDelay of selective attention during the attentional blink
Vul, E., Hanus, D., & Kanwisher, N. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.009 · Cited by 29
“…stream, suggesting that selection is rendered systematically inaccurate, ‘‘delayed” (see also Chun, 1997; Popple & Levi, 2007) note that this delay is different than the general latency of the attentional gate (Reeves & Sperling, 1986) as it is caused by the interaction of two selection episodes.”
InfluentialSupplementation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) affects temporal, but not spatial visual attention
Leonte, A., Colzato, L. S., Steenbergen, L., Hommel, B., & Akyürek, E. G. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.11.004 · Cited by 28
“One mechanism that has been proposed to cause order errors at Lag 1 is precedence or prior entry (Olivers, Hilkenmeier, & Scharlau, 2011; Reeves & Sperling, 1986; see also Shore, Spence, & Klein, 2001; Titchener, 1908; Vibell, Klinge, Zampini, Spence, & Nobre, 2007), by which a stimulus that is…”
BackgroundA presentation of Attentional Semantics
Marchetti, G. (2006) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0144-9 · Cited by 30
“James 1986), a spotlight that moves (Tsal 1983), a gate (Reeves and Sperling 1986), or a selective, amplifying channel (La Berge 1995), imply all that it is seen as a privileged route for events to enter our mind or consciousness, that is, as a kind of mechanism which, letting information come in and be processed by s…”
BackgroundTemporal attention causes systematic biases in visual confidence
Recht, S., Mamassian, P., & de Gardelle, V. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48063-x · Cited by 27
Kohly, R. P., & Regan, D. M. (2000) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00090-0 · Cited by 28
The Impact of World Knowledge on the Processing of Mandarin Possessive Reflexive zijide
Li, R., Zhang, Z., & Ni, C. (2016) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-016-9456-9 · Cited by 27
“Pseudoextinction”: Asymmetries in simultaneous attentional selection.
Goodbourn, P. T., & Holcombe, A. O. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0038734 · Cited by 27
“…position in the RSVP stream of a reported item relative to the cued target—can reveal properties of the attentional processes underlying temporal selection (Chun, 1997; Martini, 2013; Popple & Levi, 2007; Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Vul, Hanus, & Kanwisher, 2008; Vul, Nieuwenstein, & Kanwisher, 2008).”
BackgroundThe diachronic account of attentional selectivity
Zivony, A., & Eimer, M. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02023-7 · Cited by 32
“In this paper, we built upon the insights of “diachronic” computational models (e.g., Reeves & Sperling, 1986; Wyble et al., 2009) and presented the case for an alternative unified diachronic account of attentional selectivity (UDAS).”
InfluentialArtificial Intelligence for Human Computer Interaction: A Modern Approach
Huang, F., Schoop, E., Ha, D., Nichols, J. W., & Canny, J. (2021) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82681-9 · Cited by 31
How preferential is the preferential encoding of threatening stimuli?
Reinecke, A., Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.06.004 · Cited by 30
“For a wide variety of emotionally neutral materials, observers showed reduced report accuracy for the second target when it was preceded by another attended target within a temporal distance of 100–400 ms (e.g., Broadbent & Broadbent, 1987; Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992; Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
A transient processing deficit following selection of an auditory target
Mondor, T. A. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03212956 · Cited by 27
Illusory reversal of temporal order: the bias to report a dimmer stimulus as the first
Bachmann, T., Põder, E., & Luiga, I. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.012 · Cited by 30
Diverting Attention Suppresses Human Amygdala Responses to Faces
Morawetz, C., Baudewig, J., Treue, S., & Dechent, P. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00226 · Cited by 27
What do eye movements reveal about the role of memory in visual search?
Geyer, T., von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H. J. (2006) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210600831119 · Cited by 26
The perception of spatial order at a glance
Popple, A. V., & Levi, D. M. (2004) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.008 · Cited by 26
“Additionally, we found no evidence for the capacity limitation of visual attention or short-term memory suggested by Verghese and Pelli (1994) and others (Alvarez & Cavanagh , 2004; Reeves & Sperling, 1986).”
BackgroundThe Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component
Grubert, A., & Martin Eimer, A. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00898 · Cited by 25
“This discrepancy could be due to the fact that the type of attentional control employed in typical visual search tasks differs from the top-down control processes that were investigated by Reeves & Sperling (1986) and in the commanded search task of Horowitz et al. (2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDistractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: Direct evidence for distractor inhibition.
Kihara, K., Yagi, Y., Takeda, Y., & Kawahara, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0019948 · Cited by 25
Prior entry and temporal attention: Cueing affects order errors in RSVP.
Hilkenmeier, F., Olivers, C. N. L., & Scharlau, I. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0025978 · Cited by 25
Shifting Attention in a Rapid Visual Search Paradigm
Hsieh, S., & Allport, A. (1994) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.315 · Cited by 26
Common sense and conceptual halos
Hofstadter, D. R. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00052560 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Reeves, A., & Sperling, G.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-206
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2119524737
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 15.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- attentional gating, visual short-term memory, attentional blink, target detection, precedence, stimulus presentation rate
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Form Perception, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Visual Fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review