The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming
Abstract
A series of experiments assessed masked priming for letters and words that are visually similar (SIM) and dissimilar (DIS) in upper- and lowercase formats. For letters, robust DIS priming was obtained in a naming task, but this priming did not extend to a variety of non-naming tasks. For words, robust DIS priming was obtained in both naming and non-naming tasks. SIM letter and word priming extended to all tasks, but the effects were generally small for letters. The restricted set of conditions for DIS letter priming suggests that this priming is mediated by phonological-articulatory processes, and the generality of DIS word priming argues that abstract orthographic codes mediate these effects. Consistent with this conclusion, priming between homophones (for both letters and words) was found in a naming task, but little word homophone priming was obtained in a lexical decision task.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rather, the case invariance observed in several psychological experiments (e.g. Besner et al., 1984; Bowers et al., 1998) must arise from specialization resulting from a learning process.”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Bowers et al., 1998
Citations
Cites
(1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,532
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031564 · Cited by 2,974
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR
Francis, W. N., Kučera, H., & Mackie, A. W. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,310
Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.680 · Cited by 1,414
Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252
A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867
Integrating information across eye movements
Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90009-2 · Cited by 484
Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading.
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1197 · Cited by 391
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., & Rivière, D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/89551 · Cited by 1,305
Is vision continuous with cognition?: The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002022 · Cited by 1,274
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049 · Cited by 776
Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1705-1719
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2130614000
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- masked priming, word priming, orthographic code, phonological processing, visual similarity, homophones, naming task, lexical decision, visual word recognition
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Perceptual Masking, Phonetics, Reaction Time, Vocabulary, Writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
