Cited by 37Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and Cortisol

Modeling signal features of escape response: Effects of cessation conditioning in "learned helplessness" paradigm.

Minor, Thomas R., Trauner, Michael A., Lee, Chi-yuarn, Dess, Nancy K.·1990·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Abstract

Six experiments examined the effects of signaling the termination of inescapable shock (cessation conditioning) or shock-free periods (backward conditioning) on later escape deficits in the learned helplessness paradigm, using rats (Sprague-Dawley and Bantin-Kingman). A cessation signal prevented later performance deficits when highly variable inescapable shock durations were used during pretreatment. The inclusion of short minimum intertrial intervals during pretreatment did not alter the benefits of cessation conditioning but eliminated the protection afforded by a safety signal. The beneficial effects of both cessation and backward signals were eliminated when a single stimulus signaled shock termination and a shock-free period. Finally, a combination of cessation and backward signals was found to be most effective in immunizing against the effects of subsequent unsignaled, inescapable shock on later escape performance. These data suggest that cessation conditioning may be crucial to the prophylactic action of an escape response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0097-7403.16.2.123

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minor, T. R., Trauner, M. A., Lee, C.-Y., & Dess, N. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Published
1990
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
123-136
ISSN
  • 0097-7403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2184
OpenAlex
W2005279992
Cited by
37
References
57
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh041170-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH41170-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
learned helplessness, backward conditioning, escape behavior, inescapable shock, safety signals, signal variability, intertrial interval, escape deficit, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Electroshock, Escape Reaction, Fear, Helplessness, Learned, Male, Memory, Rats, Inbred Strains, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review