Cited by 274Psychology Research and BibliometricsMotor Control and AdaptationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Systematic effect of random error in the yoked control design.

Church, Russell M.·1964·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0042733

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some have criticized the yoked control design because individual differences in the effectiveness of the US or other factors may lead to systematic between-group differences.

    “Additionally, some have criticized the yoked control design (Church, 1964) because individual differences in the effectiveness of the US or other factors may lead to systematic between-group differences.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Church, R. M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Church, Russell M.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1964-08
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
122-131
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2005442637
Cited by
273
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
random error, measurement error, experimental design, error variance
MeSH terms
Conditioning, Classical, Eyelids, Humans, Reflex, Reinforcement, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review