Cited by 117Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and careTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

Psychosocial factors in heart surgery: Presurgical vulnerability and postsurgical recovery.

Contrada, Richard J., Boulifard, David A., Hekler, Eric B., Idler, Ellen L., Spruill, Tanya M., Labouvie, Erich W., Krause, Tyrone J.·2008·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Distress and low perceived social support were examined as indicators of psychosocial vulnerability in patients about to undergo heart surgery. DESIGN: A total of 550 study patients underwent heart surgeries, including bypass grafting and valve procedures. Psychosocial interviews were conducted about five days before surgery, and biomedical data were obtained from hospital records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic, personality, religious, and biomedical factors were evaluated as predictors of psychosocial vulnerability, and all five sets of variables were evaluated as contributors to hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Patients scoring higher on one or more indicator of presurgical psychosocial vulnerability were younger, more likely to be female, less likely to be married, less well educated, lower in dispositional optimism, higher in trait anger, and lower in religiousness. Older age, depression, low support, and low trait anger each showed an independent, prospective association with greater LOS, and several other predictors had prospective relationships with LOS that were statistically mediated by depression or perceived support. CONCLUSION: Evidence that multiple psychosocial factors may influence adaptation to heart surgery has implications for understanding and ameliorating presurgical distress and for improving postsurgical recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.309

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contrada, R. J., Boulifard, D. A., Hekler, E. B., Idler, E. L., Spruill, T. M., Labouvie, E. W., & Krause, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2008-05
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
309-319
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2111002669
Cited by
117
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG15160; AG16750)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Keywords
psychosocial vulnerability, cardiac surgery, perceived social support, depression, length of hospital stay, dispositional optimism, trait anger, religiosity, heart valve surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Heart Valves, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Postoperative Care, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review