Cited by 205Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthReligion and Society Interactions

Psychosocial Factors in Outcomes of Heart Surgery: The Impact of Religious Involvement and Depressive Symptoms.

Contrada, Richard J., Goyal, Tanya M., Cather, Corinne, Rafalson, Luba, Idler, Ellen L., Krause, Tyrone J.·2004·Health Psychology

Abstract

This article reports a prospective study of religiousness and recovery from heart surgery. Religiousness and other psychosocial factors were assessed in 142 patients about a week prior to surgery. Those with stronger religious beliefs subsequently had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, the former effect mediating the latter. Attendance at religious services was unrelated to complications but predicted longer hospitalizations. Prayer was not related to recovery. Depressive symptoms were associated with longer hospital stays. Dispositional optimism, trait hostility, and social support were unrelated to outcomes. Effects of religious beliefs and attendance were stronger among women than men and were independent of biomedical and other psychosocial predictors. These findings encourage further examination of differential health effects of the various elements of religiousness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.227

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 13 most rigorous CHD studies, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD and one found a positive one.

    “Of the 13 studies with the most rigorous methodology, nine (69%) found inverse relationships with CHD [357–365] and one found a positive one [366].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Contrada, R. J., Goyal, T. M., Cather, C., Rafalson, L., Idler, E. L., & Krause, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
227-238
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2157997314
Cited by
205
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG016750, AG 16750, AG15160, R03AG015160)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious involvement, religious beliefs, religious service attendance, prayer, depressive symptoms, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, psychosocial factors, dispositional optimism, trait hostility, social support, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Artery Bypass, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review