Cited by 65Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Distributing working memory resources during problem solving.

Cary, Melanie, Carlson, Richard A.·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

This study examines how problem solvers distribute working memory demands over internal and external resources. Participants recorded notes while performing an arithmetic task. They recorded a majority of intermediate results and labeled many of those results (e.g., "C = 10"). When more effort was required to take notes, participants recorded fewer results. Participants with a consistent goal structure recorded fewer results and with practice labeled fewer recorded results than those with varied goal structures. When notes were displayed in a consistent spatial arrangement participants labeled fewer recorded results than when notes appeared in varied locations. These findings indicate that individuals use explicit and implicit strategies for indexing intermediate results. The data support the view that individuals flexibly distribute working memory over internal and external resources in response to situational cost-benefit considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.836

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raising the costs of externalisations increases the use of internal strategies such as memory-based processing, whereas lowering the costs of externalisations increases the use of technical tools.

    “Raising the costs of externalisations (e.g., by adding additional physical or temporal demands) increases the use of internal strategies such as memory-based processing, whereas lowering the costs of externalisations increases the use of technical tools (e.g., Cary & Carlson, 2001; Gray & Fu, 2004; Gray et al., 2006; Morgan & Patrick, 2013; O’Hara & Payne, 1998; Schönpflug, 1986).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Cary & Carlson, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cary, M., & Carlson, R. A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
2001
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
836-848
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2061791951
Cited by
65
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
working memory, problem solving, external memory aids, note-taking, intermediate outcomes, goal structure, spatial configuration, cost-benefit trade-off, arithmetic problem solving
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Memory, Short-Term, Practice, Psychological, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review