Cited by 155AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

The Effects of Operator Implementation Cost on Planfulness of Problem Solving and Learning

O'Hara, Kenton P., Payne, Stephen J.·1998·Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

This paper explores the idea that problem solving search strategies are chosen so as to optimize performance within the constraints of a particular situation. Four experiments are reported that examine the hypothesis that the cost of performing an operation affects "planfulness"--the level of planning during problem solving. The first experiment investigated problem solving with the 8-puzzle and compared strategies adopted when there was a high versus a low cost of making a move, manipulating cost in terms of command length. The second experiment used protocol analysis to provide more direct evidence for increased planning. The third and fourth experiments looked at the effects of these different strategies on learning: the third examined how problem solving performance on a direct manipulation interface is affected by prior problem solving experience in the same domain with either a high cost or low cost command-driven interface, demonstrating improved performance as a result of training on an interface with high cost operations; the fourth experiment, like the third, examined the effects of prior problem solving experience with either a high cost or low cost interface on subsequent problem solving performance in a different domain using a direct manipulation interface showing no effect to training interface on subsequent performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/cogp.1997.0676

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Problem solving was less successful in a transfer phase following an increasing amount of interactions with a technical tool relative to using internal mental processes.

    “For instance, O’Hara and Payne (1998) observed that problem solving was less successful in a transfer phase following an increasing amount of interactions with a technical tool relative to using internal mental processes.”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as O’Hara and Payne (1998)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Hara, K. P., & Payne, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Wales (GB)
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
34-70
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071244092
Cited by
155
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
operator cost, planfulness, problem solving, search strategies, 8-puzzle, direct manipulation interfaces, transfer of training, protocol analysis, planning
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Motivation, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Students, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review